自然实验是劳动经济学的最新工具

V. Blyzniuk
{"title":"自然实验是劳动经济学的最新工具","authors":"V. Blyzniuk","doi":"10.15407/etet2022.01.099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The works by three scientists: D. Card, J. Angrist and G. Imbens received the highest award of economic scientific heritage in memory of A. Nobel last year. The scientific community recognizes their empirical contribution to the labor economy and their original view of causation and justification of methodological approaches to their evaluation in real life. It is well known that most of the problematic issues in the social sciences are related to causation. There is a need to assess the effects of uncontrolled migration on wages and employment in the regions where migrants arrive. And how to assess the impact of the duration of education on future earnings? The lack of a comparative framework, such as information on the consequences of changes in migration or refusal to continue training, makes it very difficult to assess the consequences and causation. But the winners of 2021 proved the possibility of answering such questions by conducting natural experiments that are similar to clinical trials in medicine. The results of their research have allowed economists around the world to obtain and use the toolkit of natural experiment in the study of economic processes. Without violating ethical norms, the winners were able to assess the effects of various factors and the socio-economic effectiveness of causal relationships. A special advantage of their scientific results is the change of the research paradigm and the updating of tools in labor economics. Renouncing the traditional view of experimentation, the Nobel laureates in economics argued that they could consider a significant number of economic agents in roughly the same situation and, observing changes in their behavior and consequences, conclude and evaluate causal relationships. The author of the article, analyzing the scientific achievements of last year's winners, concludes that the latest toolkit for randomized experiments have allowed the winners to get original and very controversial answers to traditional tasks, thus carrying out a \"revolution of trust\" in economics.","PeriodicalId":209799,"journal":{"name":"Ekonomìčna teorìâ","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Natural experiments as the latest tools in labor economics\",\"authors\":\"V. Blyzniuk\",\"doi\":\"10.15407/etet2022.01.099\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The works by three scientists: D. Card, J. Angrist and G. Imbens received the highest award of economic scientific heritage in memory of A. Nobel last year. The scientific community recognizes their empirical contribution to the labor economy and their original view of causation and justification of methodological approaches to their evaluation in real life. It is well known that most of the problematic issues in the social sciences are related to causation. There is a need to assess the effects of uncontrolled migration on wages and employment in the regions where migrants arrive. And how to assess the impact of the duration of education on future earnings? The lack of a comparative framework, such as information on the consequences of changes in migration or refusal to continue training, makes it very difficult to assess the consequences and causation. But the winners of 2021 proved the possibility of answering such questions by conducting natural experiments that are similar to clinical trials in medicine. The results of their research have allowed economists around the world to obtain and use the toolkit of natural experiment in the study of economic processes. Without violating ethical norms, the winners were able to assess the effects of various factors and the socio-economic effectiveness of causal relationships. A special advantage of their scientific results is the change of the research paradigm and the updating of tools in labor economics. Renouncing the traditional view of experimentation, the Nobel laureates in economics argued that they could consider a significant number of economic agents in roughly the same situation and, observing changes in their behavior and consequences, conclude and evaluate causal relationships. The author of the article, analyzing the scientific achievements of last year's winners, concludes that the latest toolkit for randomized experiments have allowed the winners to get original and very controversial answers to traditional tasks, thus carrying out a \\\"revolution of trust\\\" in economics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":209799,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ekonomìčna teorìâ\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ekonomìčna teorìâ\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15407/etet2022.01.099\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ekonomìčna teorìâ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15407/etet2022.01.099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

卡德(D. Card)、安格里斯特(J. Angrist)、因本斯(G. Imbens)等3名科学家的研究成果在去年获得了纪念诺贝尔奖的最高经济科学遗产奖。科学界认识到他们对劳动经济的经验贡献,以及他们对因果关系的原创性观点,以及他们在现实生活中评估的方法论方法的正当性。众所周知,社会科学中的大多数问题都与因果关系有关。有必要评估不受控制的移徙对移徙者到达地区的工资和就业的影响。如何评估受教育时间对未来收入的影响?由于缺乏一个可比较的框架,例如关于移徙变化或拒绝继续培训的后果的资料,因此很难评估后果和原因。但2021年的获奖者通过进行类似于医学临床试验的自然实验,证明了回答这些问题的可能性。他们的研究结果使世界各地的经济学家能够在经济过程的研究中获得并使用自然实验的工具包。在不违反道德规范的情况下,获奖者能够评估各种因素的影响和因果关系的社会经济效益。其科研成果的一个特殊优势是劳动经济学研究范式的转变和工具的更新。两位诺贝尔经济学奖得主放弃了传统的实验观,认为他们可以在大致相同的情况下考虑大量的经济主体,观察他们的行为和后果的变化,得出结论并评估因果关系。这篇文章的作者分析了去年获奖者的科学成就,得出的结论是,最新的随机实验工具包使获奖者能够对传统任务获得原创的、非常有争议的答案,从而在经济学中进行了一场“信任革命”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Natural experiments as the latest tools in labor economics
The works by three scientists: D. Card, J. Angrist and G. Imbens received the highest award of economic scientific heritage in memory of A. Nobel last year. The scientific community recognizes their empirical contribution to the labor economy and their original view of causation and justification of methodological approaches to their evaluation in real life. It is well known that most of the problematic issues in the social sciences are related to causation. There is a need to assess the effects of uncontrolled migration on wages and employment in the regions where migrants arrive. And how to assess the impact of the duration of education on future earnings? The lack of a comparative framework, such as information on the consequences of changes in migration or refusal to continue training, makes it very difficult to assess the consequences and causation. But the winners of 2021 proved the possibility of answering such questions by conducting natural experiments that are similar to clinical trials in medicine. The results of their research have allowed economists around the world to obtain and use the toolkit of natural experiment in the study of economic processes. Without violating ethical norms, the winners were able to assess the effects of various factors and the socio-economic effectiveness of causal relationships. A special advantage of their scientific results is the change of the research paradigm and the updating of tools in labor economics. Renouncing the traditional view of experimentation, the Nobel laureates in economics argued that they could consider a significant number of economic agents in roughly the same situation and, observing changes in their behavior and consequences, conclude and evaluate causal relationships. The author of the article, analyzing the scientific achievements of last year's winners, concludes that the latest toolkit for randomized experiments have allowed the winners to get original and very controversial answers to traditional tasks, thus carrying out a "revolution of trust" in economics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信