话语在多学科中的作用

Y. Julliard, A. Schwab
{"title":"话语在多学科中的作用","authors":"Y. Julliard, A. Schwab","doi":"10.1109/ISTAS.2001.937716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper deals with the role of discourses and dialogues in multidisciplinary processes and their relation to engineering education. Discourses are an effective method in shaping multidisciplinary dialogues. Awareness of multidisciplinary reflection is growing due to two effects: Increasing specialization of the engineering disciplines and increasing impact of technology on daily life. Many engineering and technological problems are no longer solvable within a single discipline. Moreover, boundary conditions from the societal and ethical context become more and more important. Transdisciplinar reflection is needed to achieve the appropriate solution, satisfying both, the technological and social constraints. Multidisciplinary practice requires knowledge about the different ways of intradisciplinar hermeneutics and knowledge management. Technological hermeneutics is one of the keys in understanding value-management, reasoning and reflection in engineering sciences and practice. Further, basic knowledge about ethical reasoning and reflection techniques of human sciences will be helpful in understanding of contextual problems and their normative treatments. Two levels of multidisciplinarity are examined: Interdisciplinarity between experts coming from different scientific disciplines working on the same issue, and secondly, communication between experts and non-experts belonging to stakeholder groups, e.g. in technology assessment.","PeriodicalId":394055,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings International Symposium on Technology and Society","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of discourses in multidisciplinarity\",\"authors\":\"Y. Julliard, A. Schwab\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISTAS.2001.937716\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper deals with the role of discourses and dialogues in multidisciplinary processes and their relation to engineering education. Discourses are an effective method in shaping multidisciplinary dialogues. Awareness of multidisciplinary reflection is growing due to two effects: Increasing specialization of the engineering disciplines and increasing impact of technology on daily life. Many engineering and technological problems are no longer solvable within a single discipline. Moreover, boundary conditions from the societal and ethical context become more and more important. Transdisciplinar reflection is needed to achieve the appropriate solution, satisfying both, the technological and social constraints. Multidisciplinary practice requires knowledge about the different ways of intradisciplinar hermeneutics and knowledge management. Technological hermeneutics is one of the keys in understanding value-management, reasoning and reflection in engineering sciences and practice. Further, basic knowledge about ethical reasoning and reflection techniques of human sciences will be helpful in understanding of contextual problems and their normative treatments. Two levels of multidisciplinarity are examined: Interdisciplinarity between experts coming from different scientific disciplines working on the same issue, and secondly, communication between experts and non-experts belonging to stakeholder groups, e.g. in technology assessment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":394055,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings International Symposium on Technology and Society\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-07-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings International Symposium on Technology and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISTAS.2001.937716\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings International Symposium on Technology and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISTAS.2001.937716","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本文讨论了多学科过程中话语和对话的作用及其与工程教育的关系。话语是形成多学科对话的有效方法。多学科反思意识的增长是由于两个影响:工程学科的日益专业化和技术对日常生活的影响越来越大。许多工程和技术问题不再能够在单一学科中解决。此外,来自社会和伦理背景的边界条件变得越来越重要。需要跨学科的反思来实现适当的解决方案,同时满足技术和社会的约束。多学科实践需要了解不同的学科内部解释学和知识管理方法。技术解释学是理解工程科学和实践中的价值管理、推理和反思的关键之一。此外,关于人文科学的伦理推理和反思技术的基本知识将有助于理解上下文问题及其规范处理。研究了两个层次的多学科性:来自不同科学学科的专家在同一问题上的跨学科性;其次,属于利益相关者群体的专家和非专家之间的沟通,例如在技术评估中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The role of discourses in multidisciplinarity
This paper deals with the role of discourses and dialogues in multidisciplinary processes and their relation to engineering education. Discourses are an effective method in shaping multidisciplinary dialogues. Awareness of multidisciplinary reflection is growing due to two effects: Increasing specialization of the engineering disciplines and increasing impact of technology on daily life. Many engineering and technological problems are no longer solvable within a single discipline. Moreover, boundary conditions from the societal and ethical context become more and more important. Transdisciplinar reflection is needed to achieve the appropriate solution, satisfying both, the technological and social constraints. Multidisciplinary practice requires knowledge about the different ways of intradisciplinar hermeneutics and knowledge management. Technological hermeneutics is one of the keys in understanding value-management, reasoning and reflection in engineering sciences and practice. Further, basic knowledge about ethical reasoning and reflection techniques of human sciences will be helpful in understanding of contextual problems and their normative treatments. Two levels of multidisciplinarity are examined: Interdisciplinarity between experts coming from different scientific disciplines working on the same issue, and secondly, communication between experts and non-experts belonging to stakeholder groups, e.g. in technology assessment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信