三家跨国公司的生命周期设计实践

K. Shapiro, A. White
{"title":"三家跨国公司的生命周期设计实践","authors":"K. Shapiro, A. White","doi":"10.1109/ISEE.1999.765859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Life-cycle design (LCD), the application of life-cycle concepts to the design phase of product development, is emerging as a valuable tool for incorporating environmental impacts and trade-offs as a criterion in product/process design. Because LCD is used as an internal decision-support tool and customized to meet firm-specific needs, its strengths, successes, and limitations remain largely undocumented. An examination of LCD practices at three firms-IBM, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Armstrong World Industries-provides insights into how these methods evolve as well as a glimpse into the dynamics of organizational innovation in relation to corporate environmental management. Four ingredients are essential to initiating or sustaining a successful LCD program: (1) a pragmatic, flexible approach that avoids \"analysis paralysis;\" (2) program buy-in from multiple levels in the company; (3) supplier involvement to inform material and/or process decisions; and (4) including staff from various business functions to ensure that LCD is not merely another environmental initiative.","PeriodicalId":360946,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment (Cat. No.99CH36357)","volume":"136 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Life-cycle design practices at three multinational companies\",\"authors\":\"K. Shapiro, A. White\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISEE.1999.765859\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Life-cycle design (LCD), the application of life-cycle concepts to the design phase of product development, is emerging as a valuable tool for incorporating environmental impacts and trade-offs as a criterion in product/process design. Because LCD is used as an internal decision-support tool and customized to meet firm-specific needs, its strengths, successes, and limitations remain largely undocumented. An examination of LCD practices at three firms-IBM, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Armstrong World Industries-provides insights into how these methods evolve as well as a glimpse into the dynamics of organizational innovation in relation to corporate environmental management. Four ingredients are essential to initiating or sustaining a successful LCD program: (1) a pragmatic, flexible approach that avoids \\\"analysis paralysis;\\\" (2) program buy-in from multiple levels in the company; (3) supplier involvement to inform material and/or process decisions; and (4) including staff from various business functions to ensure that LCD is not merely another environmental initiative.\",\"PeriodicalId\":360946,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment (Cat. No.99CH36357)\",\"volume\":\"136 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-05-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment (Cat. No.99CH36357)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISEE.1999.765859\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment (Cat. No.99CH36357)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISEE.1999.765859","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

生命周期设计(LCD),将生命周期概念应用于产品开发的设计阶段,正在成为将环境影响和权衡作为产品/过程设计标准的有价值的工具。由于LCD被用作内部决策支持工具,并被定制以满足公司的特定需求,因此它的优势、成功和局限性在很大程度上仍未被记录。对三家公司(ibm、百时美施贵宝和阿姆斯壮世界工业公司)的LCD实践的考察,提供了对这些方法如何演变的见解,以及对与企业环境管理相关的组织创新动态的一瞥。启动或维持一个成功的LCD项目的四个要素是必不可少的:(1)务实、灵活的方法,避免“分析瘫痪”;(2)公司内部多层次的项目认同;(3)供应商参与,为材料和/或工艺决策提供信息;(4)召集不同业务部门的员工,确保LCD不单是另一项环保措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Life-cycle design practices at three multinational companies
Life-cycle design (LCD), the application of life-cycle concepts to the design phase of product development, is emerging as a valuable tool for incorporating environmental impacts and trade-offs as a criterion in product/process design. Because LCD is used as an internal decision-support tool and customized to meet firm-specific needs, its strengths, successes, and limitations remain largely undocumented. An examination of LCD practices at three firms-IBM, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Armstrong World Industries-provides insights into how these methods evolve as well as a glimpse into the dynamics of organizational innovation in relation to corporate environmental management. Four ingredients are essential to initiating or sustaining a successful LCD program: (1) a pragmatic, flexible approach that avoids "analysis paralysis;" (2) program buy-in from multiple levels in the company; (3) supplier involvement to inform material and/or process decisions; and (4) including staff from various business functions to ensure that LCD is not merely another environmental initiative.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信