自动降水天气现象仪观测资料的对比分析

Huang Xiaolong, Du Bin, Wu Wei
{"title":"自动降水天气现象仪观测资料的对比分析","authors":"Huang Xiaolong, Du Bin, Wu Wei","doi":"10.1109/ICMO49322.2019.9026143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we analyzed the integrity, accuracy and consistency of automatic and manual observation data of precipitation weather phenomenon from January to December in 2018 from 156 national stations in Sichuan Province to compare the capture, loss, nothingness and error of different precipitation types and time consistency in different precipitation levels. The results showed that automatic precipitation weather phenomenon instrument had the highest ability to capture rain which is 82.2%, while the lowest was only 23.5% for sleet. The highest loss rate was 96.1% for sleet and the lowest was 55.0% for rain, which was consistent with the capture rate. Rainfall was the most frequent precipitation weather process with the highest air report rate. Hail had the highest error rate but best consistency, which may be related to its less frequency, short duration and generally occured together with other precipitation weather processes. With the increase of rain intensity, the capture rate of drizzle, rain and sleet increases gradually. The highest capture rates of snow (0.1-1.0 mm / h) and hail (more than 1.0 mm / h). With the increase of rainfall intensity, the missing rate decreases gradually. The missing rate of rain and hail is the highest in precipitation intensity (0.1-1.0 mm / h). The error rate of drizzle, rain, snow and hail is the highest when the precipitation intensity is (0.1-1.0 mm / h). The error rate of sleet is the highest (> 1.0 mm / h), which is only 0.3% higher than that of precipitation intensity (0.1-1.0 mm / h).","PeriodicalId":257532,"journal":{"name":"2019 International Conference on Meteorology Observations (ICMO)","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis of the Observation Data of Automatic Precipitation Weather Phenomenon Instrument\",\"authors\":\"Huang Xiaolong, Du Bin, Wu Wei\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICMO49322.2019.9026143\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we analyzed the integrity, accuracy and consistency of automatic and manual observation data of precipitation weather phenomenon from January to December in 2018 from 156 national stations in Sichuan Province to compare the capture, loss, nothingness and error of different precipitation types and time consistency in different precipitation levels. The results showed that automatic precipitation weather phenomenon instrument had the highest ability to capture rain which is 82.2%, while the lowest was only 23.5% for sleet. The highest loss rate was 96.1% for sleet and the lowest was 55.0% for rain, which was consistent with the capture rate. Rainfall was the most frequent precipitation weather process with the highest air report rate. Hail had the highest error rate but best consistency, which may be related to its less frequency, short duration and generally occured together with other precipitation weather processes. With the increase of rain intensity, the capture rate of drizzle, rain and sleet increases gradually. The highest capture rates of snow (0.1-1.0 mm / h) and hail (more than 1.0 mm / h). With the increase of rainfall intensity, the missing rate decreases gradually. The missing rate of rain and hail is the highest in precipitation intensity (0.1-1.0 mm / h). The error rate of drizzle, rain, snow and hail is the highest when the precipitation intensity is (0.1-1.0 mm / h). The error rate of sleet is the highest (> 1.0 mm / h), which is only 0.3% higher than that of precipitation intensity (0.1-1.0 mm / h).\",\"PeriodicalId\":257532,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 International Conference on Meteorology Observations (ICMO)\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 International Conference on Meteorology Observations (ICMO)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMO49322.2019.9026143\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 International Conference on Meteorology Observations (ICMO)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMO49322.2019.9026143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文对四川省156个国家级台站2018年1 - 12月降水天气现象自动和人工观测资料的完整性、准确性和一致性进行了分析,比较了不同降水类型和不同降水水平时间一致性的捕获、损失、虚无和误差。结果表明,自动降水天气现象仪对降雨的捕获率最高,为82.2%,对雨夹雪的捕获率最低,仅为23.5%。雨夹雪的损失率最高为96.1%,雨的损失率最低为55.0%,与捕获率基本一致。降雨是最频繁的降水天气过程,空气报告率最高。冰雹的错误率最高,但一致性最好,这可能与其频率少、持续时间短、一般与其他降水天气过程同时发生有关。随着降雨强度的增大,毛毛雨、雨夹雪的捕获率逐渐增大。积雪(0.1 ~ 1.0 mm / h)和冰雹(大于1.0 mm / h)的捕获率最高,随着降雨强度的增加,丢失率逐渐降低。降雨和冰雹在降水强度(0.1 ~ 1.0 mm / h)时的失误率最高,毛毛雨、雨、雪和冰雹在降水强度(0.1 ~ 1.0 mm / h)时的失误率最高,雨夹雪的失误率最高(> 1.0 mm / h),仅比降水强度(0.1 ~ 1.0 mm / h)高0.3%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Analysis of the Observation Data of Automatic Precipitation Weather Phenomenon Instrument
In this paper, we analyzed the integrity, accuracy and consistency of automatic and manual observation data of precipitation weather phenomenon from January to December in 2018 from 156 national stations in Sichuan Province to compare the capture, loss, nothingness and error of different precipitation types and time consistency in different precipitation levels. The results showed that automatic precipitation weather phenomenon instrument had the highest ability to capture rain which is 82.2%, while the lowest was only 23.5% for sleet. The highest loss rate was 96.1% for sleet and the lowest was 55.0% for rain, which was consistent with the capture rate. Rainfall was the most frequent precipitation weather process with the highest air report rate. Hail had the highest error rate but best consistency, which may be related to its less frequency, short duration and generally occured together with other precipitation weather processes. With the increase of rain intensity, the capture rate of drizzle, rain and sleet increases gradually. The highest capture rates of snow (0.1-1.0 mm / h) and hail (more than 1.0 mm / h). With the increase of rainfall intensity, the missing rate decreases gradually. The missing rate of rain and hail is the highest in precipitation intensity (0.1-1.0 mm / h). The error rate of drizzle, rain, snow and hail is the highest when the precipitation intensity is (0.1-1.0 mm / h). The error rate of sleet is the highest (> 1.0 mm / h), which is only 0.3% higher than that of precipitation intensity (0.1-1.0 mm / h).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信