{"title":"使用多个信息源自动检测元音发音错误","authors":"Joost van Doremalen, C. Cucchiarini, H. Strik","doi":"10.1109/asru.2009.5373335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Frequent pronunciation errors made by L2 learners of Dutch often concern vowel substitutions. To detect such pronunciation errors, ASR-based confidence measures (CMs) are generally used. In the current paper we compare and combine confidence measures with MFCCs and phonetic features. The results show that the best results are obtained by using MFCCs, then CMs, and finally phonetic features, and that substantial improvements can be obtained by combining different features.","PeriodicalId":292194,"journal":{"name":"2009 IEEE Workshop on Automatic Speech Recognition & Understanding","volume":"47 23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Automatic detection of vowel pronunciation errors using multiple information sources\",\"authors\":\"Joost van Doremalen, C. Cucchiarini, H. Strik\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/asru.2009.5373335\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Frequent pronunciation errors made by L2 learners of Dutch often concern vowel substitutions. To detect such pronunciation errors, ASR-based confidence measures (CMs) are generally used. In the current paper we compare and combine confidence measures with MFCCs and phonetic features. The results show that the best results are obtained by using MFCCs, then CMs, and finally phonetic features, and that substantial improvements can be obtained by combining different features.\",\"PeriodicalId\":292194,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2009 IEEE Workshop on Automatic Speech Recognition & Understanding\",\"volume\":\"47 23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"26\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2009 IEEE Workshop on Automatic Speech Recognition & Understanding\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/asru.2009.5373335\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 IEEE Workshop on Automatic Speech Recognition & Understanding","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/asru.2009.5373335","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Automatic detection of vowel pronunciation errors using multiple information sources
Frequent pronunciation errors made by L2 learners of Dutch often concern vowel substitutions. To detect such pronunciation errors, ASR-based confidence measures (CMs) are generally used. In the current paper we compare and combine confidence measures with MFCCs and phonetic features. The results show that the best results are obtained by using MFCCs, then CMs, and finally phonetic features, and that substantial improvements can be obtained by combining different features.