Krystyna Czerni, Kraków Polska Międzynarodowy Instytut Badań nad Sztuką Irsa
{"title":"Malarska „dwujęzyczność” Jerzego Nowosielskiego. Związki między abstrakcją a ikoną w monumentalnych projektach sakralnych","authors":"Krystyna Czerni, Kraków Polska Międzynarodowy Instytut Badań nad Sztuką Irsa","doi":"10.15584/setde.2020.13.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The sacred art of Jerzy Nowosielski, an outstanding Polish painter of the second half of the 20th century, is an example of the creative continuation of the Byzantine tradition in Poland, but also an embodiment of the debate with the painting tradition of the East and with the experience of the Church. Both in theory and in painting practice, the artist redefined the concept of the icon, attempting to expand its formula so that it not only spoke of the Kingdom, but also included the image of the earthly, imperfect reality of the pilgrim Church. In his designs of sacred interiors for churches of various Christian denominations, Nowosielski wanted to combine three theological disciplines and their respective ways of representation: Christology, sophiology and angelology. Beside a classical icon, called by the painter a “Christological- Chalcedonian” icon, Nowosielski demanded a “sophiological” icon, bringing into the space of a church an earthly, painful reality, traces of inner struggle and doubt – hence the presence of doloristic motifs in his icons. The “inspired geometry” also became a complement to the holy images; the artist noticed a huge spiritual potential in abstract painting, to which he eventually assigned the role of icon painting. The poetic concept of “subtle bodies” – abstract angels testifying to the reality of the spiritual world – drew from the early Christian theological thought, which argued about the corporeality of spiritual entities, from Byzantine angelology, the tradition of theosophy and occultism, but also from the art of the first avant-garde, especially that from Eastern Europe, which inherited the Orthodox cult of the image. Nowosielski’s bilingualism as a painter – practicing abstraction and figuration in tandem, including within the church – paralleled the liturgical practice of many religious communities using different languages to express different levels of reality: human affairs and divine affairs. The tradition of apophatic theology, proclaiming the truth about the “unrepresentability” of God, was also important in shaping Nowosielski’s ideas. For Nowosielski’s monumental art, the problem of the mutual relationship between painting and architecture proved crucial. The artist based his concept on the decisive domination of painting over architecture and the independence of monumental painting. His goal was the principle of creating a sacred interior as a holistic, comprehensive vision of space which leads the participants of liturgy “out of everyday life” and into a different, transcendent dimension, in which the painter saw the main purpose of sacred art. From his first projects from the 1950s till the end of his artistic practice Nowosielski tried to realize his own dream version of the “ideal church”. In many of his projects he introduced abstraction into the temple, covering the walls, vaults, presbyteries, sometimes even the floors with a network of triangular “subtle bodies”. Forced to compromise, he introduced sacred abstraction into murals, as accompanying geometries, or into stained glass windows. The interiors, comprehensively and meticulously planned, were supposed to create the effect of “passing through”, “rending the veil” – from behind which a new, heavenly reality dawned. In practice, it was not always possible to achieve this intention, but the artist’s aim was to create an impression of visual unity, a sense of “entering the painting”, of being immersed in the element of painting. Painting in space was supposed to unite a broken world, to combine physical and spiritual reality into an integral whole. When designing sacred interiors, Nowosielski used the sanctity of the icon, but also the pure qualities of painting which were to cause a “mystical feeling of God’s reality”. The aim of sacred art understood in such a way turned out to be initiation rather than teaching. In this shift of emphasis Nowosielski saw the only chance for the revival of sacred art, postulating even a shift of the burden of evangelization from verbal teaching to the work of charismatic art.","PeriodicalId":385479,"journal":{"name":"Sacrum et Decorum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sacrum et Decorum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15584/setde.2020.13.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

20世纪下半叶杰出的波兰画家耶日·诺沃瑟尔斯基(Jerzy Nowosielski)的神圣艺术是波兰拜占庭传统创造性延续的一个例子,也是与东方绘画传统和教会经验辩论的体现。无论是在理论还是在绘画实践中,艺术家都重新定义了圣像的概念,试图扩展它的公式,使它不仅谈论王国,而且还包括世俗的、不完美的现实朝圣者教堂的形象。在他为各种基督教教派的教堂设计神圣室内时,Nowosielski想要结合三种神学学科及其各自的表现方式:基督论、诡辩论和天使论。除了一个古典的圣像,被画家称为“基督-迦克顿”的圣像,诺沃瑟尔斯基要求一个“诡辩”的圣像,把世俗的、痛苦的现实、内心挣扎和怀疑的痕迹带入教堂的空间——因此,在他的圣像中出现了悲观的主题。“灵感几何”也成为神圣形象的补充;艺术家注意到抽象绘画具有巨大的精神潜能,并最终赋予其象征绘画的角色。“微妙的身体”的诗意概念——抽象的天使证明了精神世界的现实——来自早期基督教神学思想,它争论了精神实体的肉体性,来自拜占庭天使学,神智学和神秘主义的传统,也来自第一个先锋派艺术,特别是来自东欧的艺术,它继承了东正教对图像的崇拜。作为一名画家,诺沃瑟尔斯基的双语能力——同时运用抽象和具象,包括在教堂里——与许多宗教团体使用不同的语言来表达不同层次的现实——人类事务和神圣事务——的礼仪实践相平行。阿帕法神学的传统,宣称上帝的“不可表征性”的真理,在形成诺沃瑟尔斯基的思想方面也很重要。对于Nowosielski的不朽艺术来说,绘画和建筑之间的相互关系问题被证明是至关重要的。这位艺术家的理念基于绘画对建筑的决定性统治和纪念性绘画的独立性。他的目标是创造一个神圣的内部,作为一个整体的,全面的空间视野,引导礼仪的参与者“走出日常生活”,进入一个不同的,超越的维度,在这里画家看到了神圣艺术的主要目的。从20世纪50年代他的第一个项目到他的艺术实践结束,诺沃瑟尔斯基试图实现他自己的梦想版本的“理想教堂”。在他的许多项目中,他将抽象引入寺庙,覆盖墙壁、拱顶、长老会,有时甚至用三角形的“微妙体”网络覆盖地板。被迫妥协,他将神圣的抽象引入壁画,作为伴随的几何图形,或引入彩色玻璃窗。内部经过全面而细致的规划,应该创造出“穿过”、“撕开面纱”的效果——从后面出现了一个新的、天堂般的现实。在实践中,并不总是能够实现这一意图,但艺术家的目的是创造一种视觉统一的印象,一种“进入绘画”的感觉,沉浸在绘画元素中。空间绘画被认为是将一个破碎的世界统一起来,将物质和精神的现实结合成一个整体。在设计神圣的室内装饰时,Nowosielski使用了圣像的神圣性,也使用了绘画的纯粹品质,这是为了引起“上帝现实的神秘感觉”。以这种方式理解的神圣艺术的目的原来是启蒙而不是教学。在这种重点的转移中,诺沃瑟尔斯基看到了神圣艺术复兴的唯一机会,甚至假设了福音传播的负担从口头教学转移到魅力艺术的工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Malarska „dwujęzyczność” Jerzego Nowosielskiego. Związki między abstrakcją a ikoną w monumentalnych projektach sakralnych
The sacred art of Jerzy Nowosielski, an outstanding Polish painter of the second half of the 20th century, is an example of the creative continuation of the Byzantine tradition in Poland, but also an embodiment of the debate with the painting tradition of the East and with the experience of the Church. Both in theory and in painting practice, the artist redefined the concept of the icon, attempting to expand its formula so that it not only spoke of the Kingdom, but also included the image of the earthly, imperfect reality of the pilgrim Church. In his designs of sacred interiors for churches of various Christian denominations, Nowosielski wanted to combine three theological disciplines and their respective ways of representation: Christology, sophiology and angelology. Beside a classical icon, called by the painter a “Christological- Chalcedonian” icon, Nowosielski demanded a “sophiological” icon, bringing into the space of a church an earthly, painful reality, traces of inner struggle and doubt – hence the presence of doloristic motifs in his icons. The “inspired geometry” also became a complement to the holy images; the artist noticed a huge spiritual potential in abstract painting, to which he eventually assigned the role of icon painting. The poetic concept of “subtle bodies” – abstract angels testifying to the reality of the spiritual world – drew from the early Christian theological thought, which argued about the corporeality of spiritual entities, from Byzantine angelology, the tradition of theosophy and occultism, but also from the art of the first avant-garde, especially that from Eastern Europe, which inherited the Orthodox cult of the image. Nowosielski’s bilingualism as a painter – practicing abstraction and figuration in tandem, including within the church – paralleled the liturgical practice of many religious communities using different languages to express different levels of reality: human affairs and divine affairs. The tradition of apophatic theology, proclaiming the truth about the “unrepresentability” of God, was also important in shaping Nowosielski’s ideas. For Nowosielski’s monumental art, the problem of the mutual relationship between painting and architecture proved crucial. The artist based his concept on the decisive domination of painting over architecture and the independence of monumental painting. His goal was the principle of creating a sacred interior as a holistic, comprehensive vision of space which leads the participants of liturgy “out of everyday life” and into a different, transcendent dimension, in which the painter saw the main purpose of sacred art. From his first projects from the 1950s till the end of his artistic practice Nowosielski tried to realize his own dream version of the “ideal church”. In many of his projects he introduced abstraction into the temple, covering the walls, vaults, presbyteries, sometimes even the floors with a network of triangular “subtle bodies”. Forced to compromise, he introduced sacred abstraction into murals, as accompanying geometries, or into stained glass windows. The interiors, comprehensively and meticulously planned, were supposed to create the effect of “passing through”, “rending the veil” – from behind which a new, heavenly reality dawned. In practice, it was not always possible to achieve this intention, but the artist’s aim was to create an impression of visual unity, a sense of “entering the painting”, of being immersed in the element of painting. Painting in space was supposed to unite a broken world, to combine physical and spiritual reality into an integral whole. When designing sacred interiors, Nowosielski used the sanctity of the icon, but also the pure qualities of painting which were to cause a “mystical feeling of God’s reality”. The aim of sacred art understood in such a way turned out to be initiation rather than teaching. In this shift of emphasis Nowosielski saw the only chance for the revival of sacred art, postulating even a shift of the burden of evangelization from verbal teaching to the work of charismatic art.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信