{"title":"学习风格、跨文化敏感性与国际态度:以日本大学为例","authors":"M. Toyama, Y. Yamazaki","doi":"10.36315/2020inpact044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We explored how learning style relates to intercultural sensitivity and how these two variables are associated with international attitudes in the context of a Japanese university. Since the Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology articulated the magnitude of shifting towards globalization of Japanese higher education, many universities have continued to advance initiatives to prepare their students for globalized contexts. Little is known about how learning style relates to psychological variables of cross-cultural communication. Thus, the present empirical study attempted to fill this gap. Participants of the study were 109 Japanese students enrolled at a Japanese university. We applied three measures: Kolb’s Learning Style Inventory, Chen and Starosta’s Intercultural Sensitivity Scale, and Yashima’s International Posture measure. Because factor structure with constituent items of the Intercultural Sensitivity Scale was unresolved, we initially examined how its latent constructs are configured and then identified four underlying components: Affirmative & Enjoyment Interaction, Negative Perceptions, Anxious Interaction, and Respect of Cultural Differences. The International Posture consists of four themes to measure Intercultural Approach Tendency, Interest in International Vocation, Interest in Foreign Affairs, and Willingness to Communicate to the World. Results of regression analysis illustrated that a learning style variable of more acting over reflecting significantly related to the sensitivity variable of Anxious Interaction (β = -0.26, p < 0.01). Subsequently, results of regression analysis indicated that a learning style variable of more thinking over feeling was significantly associated with Intercultural Approach Tendency (β = -0.19, p < 0.01), while that of more acting over reflecting was significantly associated with Intercultural Approach Tendency (β = 0.16, p < 0.05) and Interest in International Vocation (β = 0.30, p < 0.01). As to relationships between intercultural sensitivity and international attitudes, the results showed that Affirmative & Enjoyment Interaction was significantly associated with all four international attitudes (βs ranged from 0.24 to 0.57); Anxious Interaction significantly related to only Willingness to Communicate to the World (β = -0.33, p < 0.01); and Respect of Cultural Differences was significantly linked with Intercultural Approach Tendency (β = 0.20, p < 0.01) and Interest in Foreign Affairs (β = 0.28, p < 0.01). The results suggest that learning style relates to intercultural sensitivity and international attitudes, but the relationship depends on the type of learning style variable and the specific factor in intercultural sensitivity and international attitudes.","PeriodicalId":179933,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Applications and Trends 2020","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"LEARNING STYLE, INTERCULTURAL SENSITIVITY, AND INTERNATIONAL ATTITUDES: A CASE OF A JAPANESE UNIVERSITY\",\"authors\":\"M. Toyama, Y. Yamazaki\",\"doi\":\"10.36315/2020inpact044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We explored how learning style relates to intercultural sensitivity and how these two variables are associated with international attitudes in the context of a Japanese university. Since the Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology articulated the magnitude of shifting towards globalization of Japanese higher education, many universities have continued to advance initiatives to prepare their students for globalized contexts. Little is known about how learning style relates to psychological variables of cross-cultural communication. Thus, the present empirical study attempted to fill this gap. Participants of the study were 109 Japanese students enrolled at a Japanese university. We applied three measures: Kolb’s Learning Style Inventory, Chen and Starosta’s Intercultural Sensitivity Scale, and Yashima’s International Posture measure. Because factor structure with constituent items of the Intercultural Sensitivity Scale was unresolved, we initially examined how its latent constructs are configured and then identified four underlying components: Affirmative & Enjoyment Interaction, Negative Perceptions, Anxious Interaction, and Respect of Cultural Differences. The International Posture consists of four themes to measure Intercultural Approach Tendency, Interest in International Vocation, Interest in Foreign Affairs, and Willingness to Communicate to the World. Results of regression analysis illustrated that a learning style variable of more acting over reflecting significantly related to the sensitivity variable of Anxious Interaction (β = -0.26, p < 0.01). Subsequently, results of regression analysis indicated that a learning style variable of more thinking over feeling was significantly associated with Intercultural Approach Tendency (β = -0.19, p < 0.01), while that of more acting over reflecting was significantly associated with Intercultural Approach Tendency (β = 0.16, p < 0.05) and Interest in International Vocation (β = 0.30, p < 0.01). As to relationships between intercultural sensitivity and international attitudes, the results showed that Affirmative & Enjoyment Interaction was significantly associated with all four international attitudes (βs ranged from 0.24 to 0.57); Anxious Interaction significantly related to only Willingness to Communicate to the World (β = -0.33, p < 0.01); and Respect of Cultural Differences was significantly linked with Intercultural Approach Tendency (β = 0.20, p < 0.01) and Interest in Foreign Affairs (β = 0.28, p < 0.01). The results suggest that learning style relates to intercultural sensitivity and international attitudes, but the relationship depends on the type of learning style variable and the specific factor in intercultural sensitivity and international attitudes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":179933,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychological Applications and Trends 2020\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychological Applications and Trends 2020\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36315/2020inpact044\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Applications and Trends 2020","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36315/2020inpact044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
我们以一所日本大学为例,探讨了学习风格与跨文化敏感性之间的关系,以及这两个变量与国际态度之间的关系。自从日本教育、文化、体育、科学和技术省阐明了日本高等教育向全球化转变的重要性以来,许多大学继续推进倡议,让学生为全球化背景做好准备。关于学习风格与跨文化交际的心理变量之间的关系,人们知之甚少。因此,本实证研究试图填补这一空白。这项研究的参与者是109名在日本一所大学就读的日本学生。我们采用了三种测量方法:Kolb的学习风格量表、Chen和Starosta的跨文化敏感性量表和Yashima的国际姿态量表。由于跨文化敏感性量表组成项目的因素结构尚未解决,我们首先研究了其潜在构念是如何配置的,然后确定了四个潜在成分:积极与享受互动、消极感知、焦虑互动和尊重文化差异。国际姿态包括四个主题来衡量跨文化倾向、对国际职业的兴趣、对外交事务的兴趣和与世界交流的意愿。回归分析结果显示,学习风格变量“行为过度反映”与焦虑互动敏感性变量显著相关(β = -0.26, p < 0.01)。回归分析结果显示,多思考多感受的学习风格变量与跨文化接近倾向显著相关(β = -0.19, p < 0.01),多行动多反思的学习风格变量与跨文化接近倾向显著相关(β = 0.16, p < 0.05),多行动多反思的学习风格变量与国际职业兴趣显著相关(β = 0.30, p < 0.01)。对于跨文化敏感性与国际态度的关系,结果表明,肯定与享受互动与所有四种国际态度均显著相关(βs范围为0.24 ~ 0.57);焦虑互动仅与沟通意愿显著相关(β = -0.33, p < 0.01);尊重文化差异与跨文化行为倾向(β = 0.20, p < 0.01)和对外交事务的兴趣(β = 0.28, p < 0.01)显著相关。研究结果表明,学习风格与跨文化敏感性和国际态度相关,但这种关系取决于学习风格变量的类型以及跨文化敏感性和国际态度的具体因素。
LEARNING STYLE, INTERCULTURAL SENSITIVITY, AND INTERNATIONAL ATTITUDES: A CASE OF A JAPANESE UNIVERSITY
We explored how learning style relates to intercultural sensitivity and how these two variables are associated with international attitudes in the context of a Japanese university. Since the Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology articulated the magnitude of shifting towards globalization of Japanese higher education, many universities have continued to advance initiatives to prepare their students for globalized contexts. Little is known about how learning style relates to psychological variables of cross-cultural communication. Thus, the present empirical study attempted to fill this gap. Participants of the study were 109 Japanese students enrolled at a Japanese university. We applied three measures: Kolb’s Learning Style Inventory, Chen and Starosta’s Intercultural Sensitivity Scale, and Yashima’s International Posture measure. Because factor structure with constituent items of the Intercultural Sensitivity Scale was unresolved, we initially examined how its latent constructs are configured and then identified four underlying components: Affirmative & Enjoyment Interaction, Negative Perceptions, Anxious Interaction, and Respect of Cultural Differences. The International Posture consists of four themes to measure Intercultural Approach Tendency, Interest in International Vocation, Interest in Foreign Affairs, and Willingness to Communicate to the World. Results of regression analysis illustrated that a learning style variable of more acting over reflecting significantly related to the sensitivity variable of Anxious Interaction (β = -0.26, p < 0.01). Subsequently, results of regression analysis indicated that a learning style variable of more thinking over feeling was significantly associated with Intercultural Approach Tendency (β = -0.19, p < 0.01), while that of more acting over reflecting was significantly associated with Intercultural Approach Tendency (β = 0.16, p < 0.05) and Interest in International Vocation (β = 0.30, p < 0.01). As to relationships between intercultural sensitivity and international attitudes, the results showed that Affirmative & Enjoyment Interaction was significantly associated with all four international attitudes (βs ranged from 0.24 to 0.57); Anxious Interaction significantly related to only Willingness to Communicate to the World (β = -0.33, p < 0.01); and Respect of Cultural Differences was significantly linked with Intercultural Approach Tendency (β = 0.20, p < 0.01) and Interest in Foreign Affairs (β = 0.28, p < 0.01). The results suggest that learning style relates to intercultural sensitivity and international attitudes, but the relationship depends on the type of learning style variable and the specific factor in intercultural sensitivity and international attitudes.