Arndt Heilmann, J. Freiwald, Stella Neumann, Z. Miljanović
{"title":"分析固有语法结构对翻译的影响","authors":"Arndt Heilmann, J. Freiwald, Stella Neumann, Z. Miljanović","doi":"10.1075/tcb.00062.hei","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This study analyzes translation behaviour with respect to the salience of two grammatical constructions that\n differ in frequency. We assumed that a more frequent construction is also more entrenched in the translator’s mind and that as a\n result different translation solutions are more readily available. For this reason, we expected that a more frequent construction\n is translated more quickly than a less frequent construction, resulting in lower reading and typing-related measures of cognitive\n effort during the translation process. A translation experiment was designed to test this assumption. We triangulated keystroke\n logging and eye tracking data from 11 professional translators and tested the results using linear mixed regression modelling,\n controlling for, among others, lexically-based effects of salience. While we did not find statistically significant evidence of a\n facilitation effect regarding the entrenchment of (partially) abstract grammatical structures (of-NPs), we did find salience\n effects from lexical sources such as cross-linguistic structural priming and words with typical translation solutions. Lexical\n effects of salience on the translation process were shown to be more reliable indicators of facilitation in translation than the\n salience of more abstract linguistic structures – at least if the effect is a result of salience that stems from entrenchment.\n Since one limitation of our study is its necessarily small sample size, we draw methodological conclusions for improving\n experimental designs that will be useful for researchers in empirical translation studies.","PeriodicalId":313749,"journal":{"name":"Translation, Cognition & Behavior","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analyzing the effects of entrenched grammatical constructions on translation\",\"authors\":\"Arndt Heilmann, J. Freiwald, Stella Neumann, Z. Miljanović\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/tcb.00062.hei\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This study analyzes translation behaviour with respect to the salience of two grammatical constructions that\\n differ in frequency. We assumed that a more frequent construction is also more entrenched in the translator’s mind and that as a\\n result different translation solutions are more readily available. For this reason, we expected that a more frequent construction\\n is translated more quickly than a less frequent construction, resulting in lower reading and typing-related measures of cognitive\\n effort during the translation process. A translation experiment was designed to test this assumption. We triangulated keystroke\\n logging and eye tracking data from 11 professional translators and tested the results using linear mixed regression modelling,\\n controlling for, among others, lexically-based effects of salience. While we did not find statistically significant evidence of a\\n facilitation effect regarding the entrenchment of (partially) abstract grammatical structures (of-NPs), we did find salience\\n effects from lexical sources such as cross-linguistic structural priming and words with typical translation solutions. Lexical\\n effects of salience on the translation process were shown to be more reliable indicators of facilitation in translation than the\\n salience of more abstract linguistic structures – at least if the effect is a result of salience that stems from entrenchment.\\n Since one limitation of our study is its necessarily small sample size, we draw methodological conclusions for improving\\n experimental designs that will be useful for researchers in empirical translation studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":313749,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Translation, Cognition & Behavior\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Translation, Cognition & Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/tcb.00062.hei\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translation, Cognition & Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/tcb.00062.hei","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Analyzing the effects of entrenched grammatical constructions on translation
This study analyzes translation behaviour with respect to the salience of two grammatical constructions that
differ in frequency. We assumed that a more frequent construction is also more entrenched in the translator’s mind and that as a
result different translation solutions are more readily available. For this reason, we expected that a more frequent construction
is translated more quickly than a less frequent construction, resulting in lower reading and typing-related measures of cognitive
effort during the translation process. A translation experiment was designed to test this assumption. We triangulated keystroke
logging and eye tracking data from 11 professional translators and tested the results using linear mixed regression modelling,
controlling for, among others, lexically-based effects of salience. While we did not find statistically significant evidence of a
facilitation effect regarding the entrenchment of (partially) abstract grammatical structures (of-NPs), we did find salience
effects from lexical sources such as cross-linguistic structural priming and words with typical translation solutions. Lexical
effects of salience on the translation process were shown to be more reliable indicators of facilitation in translation than the
salience of more abstract linguistic structures – at least if the effect is a result of salience that stems from entrenchment.
Since one limitation of our study is its necessarily small sample size, we draw methodological conclusions for improving
experimental designs that will be useful for researchers in empirical translation studies.