综合实物期权框架下基于模型的灵活性和可选性估计

T. Mikaelian, Donna H. Rhodes, Deborah J. Nightingale, Daniel E. Hastings
{"title":"综合实物期权框架下基于模型的灵活性和可选性估计","authors":"T. Mikaelian, Donna H. Rhodes, Deborah J. Nightingale, Daniel E. Hastings","doi":"10.1109/SYSTEMS.2009.4815802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Uncertainties can be managed through real options that provide a decision maker the right, but not the obligation, to exercise actions at a later time. In previous work [1] we introduced an integrated real options framework (IRF) that distinguishes among option mechanism and type. The mechanism is the enabler of the option, while the type refers to the flexibility provided by the option. The idea behind IRF is to use models of a system or enterprise as a coupled dependency structure matrix (C-DSM) in order to identify and value enablers and types of flexibility. In this paper, we first show how the distinction among mechanisms and types of options leads to the identification of some new “ilities”, such as optionability, that are relevant to the options identification problem. Second, we show that the semantics of a traditional dependency model does not allow for the representation and estimation of flexibility and optionability. Therefore, we extend the C-DSM model to a logical C-DSM that is capable of representing logical relations among dependencies. Finally, we present metrics for estimating flexibility and optionability from the logical C-DSM model. We discuss the results of applying these metrics to identify mechanisms and options in purchasing a swarm of uninhabited air vehicles.","PeriodicalId":131616,"journal":{"name":"2009 3rd Annual IEEE Systems Conference","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Model-based estimation of flexibility and optionability in an integrated real options framework\",\"authors\":\"T. Mikaelian, Donna H. Rhodes, Deborah J. Nightingale, Daniel E. Hastings\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SYSTEMS.2009.4815802\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Uncertainties can be managed through real options that provide a decision maker the right, but not the obligation, to exercise actions at a later time. In previous work [1] we introduced an integrated real options framework (IRF) that distinguishes among option mechanism and type. The mechanism is the enabler of the option, while the type refers to the flexibility provided by the option. The idea behind IRF is to use models of a system or enterprise as a coupled dependency structure matrix (C-DSM) in order to identify and value enablers and types of flexibility. In this paper, we first show how the distinction among mechanisms and types of options leads to the identification of some new “ilities”, such as optionability, that are relevant to the options identification problem. Second, we show that the semantics of a traditional dependency model does not allow for the representation and estimation of flexibility and optionability. Therefore, we extend the C-DSM model to a logical C-DSM that is capable of representing logical relations among dependencies. Finally, we present metrics for estimating flexibility and optionability from the logical C-DSM model. We discuss the results of applying these metrics to identify mechanisms and options in purchasing a swarm of uninhabited air vehicles.\",\"PeriodicalId\":131616,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2009 3rd Annual IEEE Systems Conference\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-03-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2009 3rd Annual IEEE Systems Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SYSTEMS.2009.4815802\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 3rd Annual IEEE Systems Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SYSTEMS.2009.4815802","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

不确定性可以通过实物期权来管理,实物期权为决策者提供了在以后采取行动的权利,而不是义务。在之前的工作[1]中,我们引入了一个区分期权机制和类型的综合实物期权框架(IRF)。机制是该选项的启用器,而类型指的是该选项提供的灵活性。IRF背后的思想是使用系统或企业的模型作为耦合依赖结构矩阵(C-DSM),以便识别和评估灵活性的促成因素和类型。在本文中,我们首先展示了期权机制和类型之间的区别如何导致与期权识别问题相关的一些新的“能力”的识别,例如可选性。其次,我们表明传统依赖模型的语义不允许灵活性和可选性的表示和估计。因此,我们将C-DSM模型扩展为能够表示依赖项之间的逻辑关系的逻辑C-DSM。最后,我们提出了从逻辑C-DSM模型估计灵活性和可选性的指标。我们讨论了应用这些指标来确定购买一群无人飞行器的机制和选择的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Model-based estimation of flexibility and optionability in an integrated real options framework
Uncertainties can be managed through real options that provide a decision maker the right, but not the obligation, to exercise actions at a later time. In previous work [1] we introduced an integrated real options framework (IRF) that distinguishes among option mechanism and type. The mechanism is the enabler of the option, while the type refers to the flexibility provided by the option. The idea behind IRF is to use models of a system or enterprise as a coupled dependency structure matrix (C-DSM) in order to identify and value enablers and types of flexibility. In this paper, we first show how the distinction among mechanisms and types of options leads to the identification of some new “ilities”, such as optionability, that are relevant to the options identification problem. Second, we show that the semantics of a traditional dependency model does not allow for the representation and estimation of flexibility and optionability. Therefore, we extend the C-DSM model to a logical C-DSM that is capable of representing logical relations among dependencies. Finally, we present metrics for estimating flexibility and optionability from the logical C-DSM model. We discuss the results of applying these metrics to identify mechanisms and options in purchasing a swarm of uninhabited air vehicles.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信