萨拉戈萨(西班牙)公共社区管理的新形式

Fernando Díaz Orueta, María Luisa Lourés Seoane, Ion Martínez Lorea
{"title":"萨拉戈萨(西班牙)公共社区管理的新形式","authors":"Fernando Díaz Orueta, María Luisa Lourés Seoane, Ion Martínez Lorea","doi":"10.29265/gypp.v30i2.879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Analysis of urban governance models becomes evident the different attitude among cities in light of the possibility of meeting new ways of local public management. Most notably since the crisis of 2008 this was made clear in different European cities when several social actors began to claim the so-called “public-communitarian management”. One of the fields where the implementation of this type of management has been raised most frequently is that of the social centres. The article proposes the term “citizen management public spaces” in referring to these experiences. The research focuses in the city of Zaragoza (Spain) analysing two particularly relevant cases and based in a qualitative methodology including the conduct of 30 in-depth interviews with members of the local government team, councillors of the opposition parties, municipal technicians and advisers as well as the different social actors involved in the centres management. Conclusions highlight that while the opening to this management typology raises tensions and problems of varied nature, it does mean an opportunity to bring in the reform of the state agenda the citizen demand of greater participation and local institutions democratization.","PeriodicalId":106365,"journal":{"name":"Gestión y Política Pública","volume":"170 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Los espacios públicos de gestión ciudadana Nuevas formas de gestión público-comunitaria en Zaragoza (España)\",\"authors\":\"Fernando Díaz Orueta, María Luisa Lourés Seoane, Ion Martínez Lorea\",\"doi\":\"10.29265/gypp.v30i2.879\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Analysis of urban governance models becomes evident the different attitude among cities in light of the possibility of meeting new ways of local public management. Most notably since the crisis of 2008 this was made clear in different European cities when several social actors began to claim the so-called “public-communitarian management”. One of the fields where the implementation of this type of management has been raised most frequently is that of the social centres. The article proposes the term “citizen management public spaces” in referring to these experiences. The research focuses in the city of Zaragoza (Spain) analysing two particularly relevant cases and based in a qualitative methodology including the conduct of 30 in-depth interviews with members of the local government team, councillors of the opposition parties, municipal technicians and advisers as well as the different social actors involved in the centres management. Conclusions highlight that while the opening to this management typology raises tensions and problems of varied nature, it does mean an opportunity to bring in the reform of the state agenda the citizen demand of greater participation and local institutions democratization.\",\"PeriodicalId\":106365,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gestión y Política Pública\",\"volume\":\"170 2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gestión y Política Pública\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29265/gypp.v30i2.879\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gestión y Política Pública","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29265/gypp.v30i2.879","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

通过对城市治理模式的分析,可以看出不同城市在适应地方公共管理新方式方面的不同态度。最值得注意的是,自2008年危机以来,这一点在不同的欧洲城市得到了明确体现,当时一些社会行动者开始主张所谓的“公共-社区主义管理”。最经常提出实施这类管理的领域之一是社会中心。本文在借鉴这些经验的基础上,提出了“市民管理公共空间”的概念。研究集中在萨拉戈萨市(西班牙),分析了两个特别相关的案例,并采用定性方法,包括对当地政府团队成员、反对党议员、市政技术人员和顾问以及参与中心管理的不同社会行动者进行30次深入访谈。结论强调,虽然对这种管理类型学的开放引起了紧张和各种性质的问题,但它确实意味着有机会引入国家议程改革,公民要求更多的参与和地方机构民主化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Los espacios públicos de gestión ciudadana Nuevas formas de gestión público-comunitaria en Zaragoza (España)
Analysis of urban governance models becomes evident the different attitude among cities in light of the possibility of meeting new ways of local public management. Most notably since the crisis of 2008 this was made clear in different European cities when several social actors began to claim the so-called “public-communitarian management”. One of the fields where the implementation of this type of management has been raised most frequently is that of the social centres. The article proposes the term “citizen management public spaces” in referring to these experiences. The research focuses in the city of Zaragoza (Spain) analysing two particularly relevant cases and based in a qualitative methodology including the conduct of 30 in-depth interviews with members of the local government team, councillors of the opposition parties, municipal technicians and advisers as well as the different social actors involved in the centres management. Conclusions highlight that while the opening to this management typology raises tensions and problems of varied nature, it does mean an opportunity to bring in the reform of the state agenda the citizen demand of greater participation and local institutions democratization.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信