胫骨干骨折延迟愈合钉动力化有用吗?系统回顾和荟萃分析

G. Garabano, Leonel Perez Alamino, Daniel Veloz Serrano, S. Iglesias, J. Mariani, C. Pesciallo
{"title":"胫骨干骨折延迟愈合钉动力化有用吗?系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"G. Garabano, Leonel Perez Alamino, Daniel Veloz Serrano, S. Iglesias, J. Mariani, C. Pesciallo","doi":"10.46889/josr.2021.2303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Nail dynamization is a controversial strategy used to treat delayed union in tibial shaft fractures. Reported union rates of nail dynamization varies within a wide range that goes from 19% to 100%. The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review and a metaanalysis of the literature to explore post-dynamization union rates in cases of delayed union of tibial fractures following locked intramedullary nailing. Methods and Findings: This systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA (Preferred Reported Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. We searched the Cochrane Database, PubMed, and the first 100 references of Google Scholar to June 2020. Inclusion criteria were as follows: English-language original research articles that included patients over 14 years of age with tibial shaft fractures treated with locked intramedullary nailing and posterior dynamization of static screws. Methodology quality was assessed using a modified version of Coleman’s score. We identified 14 studies that included 1198 fractures for full analysis. The mean age was 35.8 (range; 14-82 years) and the average follow-up period was 27 months (range; 3-100). Statically locked intramedullary nails were found in 922 (76.9%) fractures. Dynamization was reported","PeriodicalId":382112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Science and Research","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is Nail Dynamization Useful In Delayed Union of Tibial Shaft Fractures? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis\",\"authors\":\"G. Garabano, Leonel Perez Alamino, Daniel Veloz Serrano, S. Iglesias, J. Mariani, C. Pesciallo\",\"doi\":\"10.46889/josr.2021.2303\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Nail dynamization is a controversial strategy used to treat delayed union in tibial shaft fractures. Reported union rates of nail dynamization varies within a wide range that goes from 19% to 100%. The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review and a metaanalysis of the literature to explore post-dynamization union rates in cases of delayed union of tibial fractures following locked intramedullary nailing. Methods and Findings: This systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA (Preferred Reported Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. We searched the Cochrane Database, PubMed, and the first 100 references of Google Scholar to June 2020. Inclusion criteria were as follows: English-language original research articles that included patients over 14 years of age with tibial shaft fractures treated with locked intramedullary nailing and posterior dynamization of static screws. Methodology quality was assessed using a modified version of Coleman’s score. We identified 14 studies that included 1198 fractures for full analysis. The mean age was 35.8 (range; 14-82 years) and the average follow-up period was 27 months (range; 3-100). Statically locked intramedullary nails were found in 922 (76.9%) fractures. Dynamization was reported\",\"PeriodicalId\":382112,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Science and Research\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Science and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46889/josr.2021.2303\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Science and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46889/josr.2021.2303","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:髓内钉动力化是治疗胫骨干骨折延迟愈合的一种有争议的策略。报道的指甲动力愈合率在19%到100%的范围内变化很大。本研究的目的是对文献进行系统回顾和荟萃分析,以探讨锁定髓内钉后胫骨骨折延迟愈合的动力后愈合率。方法和发现:本系统评价遵循PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目)指南进行。我们检索了Cochrane数据库、PubMed和Google Scholar到2020年6月的前100篇参考文献。纳入标准如下:英文原创研究文章,包括14岁以上的胫骨干骨折患者,采用锁定髓内钉和静力螺钉后路动力化治疗。采用改良版的Coleman评分评估方法学质量。我们确定了14项研究,包括1198例骨折进行全面分析。平均年龄35.8岁(范围;14-82岁),平均随访时间为27个月(范围;3 - 100)。922例(76.9%)骨折采用静锁髓内钉。报道了动力化
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is Nail Dynamization Useful In Delayed Union of Tibial Shaft Fractures? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Background: Nail dynamization is a controversial strategy used to treat delayed union in tibial shaft fractures. Reported union rates of nail dynamization varies within a wide range that goes from 19% to 100%. The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review and a metaanalysis of the literature to explore post-dynamization union rates in cases of delayed union of tibial fractures following locked intramedullary nailing. Methods and Findings: This systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA (Preferred Reported Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. We searched the Cochrane Database, PubMed, and the first 100 references of Google Scholar to June 2020. Inclusion criteria were as follows: English-language original research articles that included patients over 14 years of age with tibial shaft fractures treated with locked intramedullary nailing and posterior dynamization of static screws. Methodology quality was assessed using a modified version of Coleman’s score. We identified 14 studies that included 1198 fractures for full analysis. The mean age was 35.8 (range; 14-82 years) and the average follow-up period was 27 months (range; 3-100). Statically locked intramedullary nails were found in 922 (76.9%) fractures. Dynamization was reported
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信