{"title":"情绪是行动研究中反身性的灵感来源","authors":"A. Cunliffe, M. Gorli, Silvia Ivaldi, G. Scaratti","doi":"10.4324/9780429289408-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this chapter we explore an aspect of action research that is rarely addressed – the role of emotion. Much of the action research (AR) literature is based around the premise of engagement in a reflective process, often characterized as a cyclical, iterative process, which is problem-based (Lewin, 1946; Reason and Bradbury, 2015). In reflexively-oriented action research, tension-filled encounters can emerge as “multiple voices and sources of knowledge are incorporated into the inquiry process and different logics of action, and different professional or organizational cultures and visions meet each other” (Ripamonti, Galuppo, Gorli, Scaratti, and Cunliffe, 2016, p. 57) and previously co- constructed meanings are challenged (Vinther and Willert, 2017). This can cause challenges for facilitators (Mughal, Gattrell, and Stead, 2018) in terms of dealing with the tensions arising from this process. This is the issue we address.","PeriodicalId":421050,"journal":{"name":"Action Research in a Relational Perspective","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Emotions as inspiration for reflexivity in action research\",\"authors\":\"A. Cunliffe, M. Gorli, Silvia Ivaldi, G. Scaratti\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9780429289408-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this chapter we explore an aspect of action research that is rarely addressed – the role of emotion. Much of the action research (AR) literature is based around the premise of engagement in a reflective process, often characterized as a cyclical, iterative process, which is problem-based (Lewin, 1946; Reason and Bradbury, 2015). In reflexively-oriented action research, tension-filled encounters can emerge as “multiple voices and sources of knowledge are incorporated into the inquiry process and different logics of action, and different professional or organizational cultures and visions meet each other” (Ripamonti, Galuppo, Gorli, Scaratti, and Cunliffe, 2016, p. 57) and previously co- constructed meanings are challenged (Vinther and Willert, 2017). This can cause challenges for facilitators (Mughal, Gattrell, and Stead, 2018) in terms of dealing with the tensions arising from this process. This is the issue we address.\",\"PeriodicalId\":421050,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Action Research in a Relational Perspective\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Action Research in a Relational Perspective\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429289408-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Action Research in a Relational Perspective","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429289408-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
在本章中,我们将探讨行动研究中很少涉及的一个方面——情感的作用。许多行动研究(AR)文献都是以参与反思过程为前提的,反思过程通常是一个周期性的、迭代的过程,这是基于问题的(Lewin, 1946;Reason and Bradbury, 2015)。在反思性导向的行动研究中,充满张力的遭遇可以出现为“多种声音和知识来源被纳入调查过程和不同的行动逻辑,不同的专业或组织文化和愿景相遇”(里帕蒙蒂,Galuppo, Gorli, Scaratti和Cunliffe, 2016,第57页),之前共同构建的意义受到挑战(Vinther和Willert, 2017)。这可能会给引导者(Mughal, Gattrell, and Stead, 2018)在处理这一过程中产生的紧张关系方面带来挑战。这是我们要解决的问题。
Emotions as inspiration for reflexivity in action research
In this chapter we explore an aspect of action research that is rarely addressed – the role of emotion. Much of the action research (AR) literature is based around the premise of engagement in a reflective process, often characterized as a cyclical, iterative process, which is problem-based (Lewin, 1946; Reason and Bradbury, 2015). In reflexively-oriented action research, tension-filled encounters can emerge as “multiple voices and sources of knowledge are incorporated into the inquiry process and different logics of action, and different professional or organizational cultures and visions meet each other” (Ripamonti, Galuppo, Gorli, Scaratti, and Cunliffe, 2016, p. 57) and previously co- constructed meanings are challenged (Vinther and Willert, 2017). This can cause challenges for facilitators (Mughal, Gattrell, and Stead, 2018) in terms of dealing with the tensions arising from this process. This is the issue we address.