基于法经济学的中小学事故处理难点分析

Chen Zeng
{"title":"基于法经济学的中小学事故处理难点分析","authors":"Chen Zeng","doi":"10.2991/ICHSSD-19.2019.108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Primary and secondary school accidents involve many conflicting interests, complex relations and have a big social impact. While the whole society emphasizes the protection of the interests of minors, the interests of the school, as the main body of responsibility distribution, are often ignored. This paper intends to analyze the dilemma of school to undertake responsibility in primary and secondary school accidents from the perspective of law and economics, and holds that the ambiguity of legislation makes the judges have to refer to administrative norms in the practice of hearing school accidents. However, administrative norms with different leniency and strictness give rise to a large number of similar cases with different judgments. The Tort Law, based on civil law principles, confirms schools’ liability for accidents on campus in order to protect the interests of minors. Nevertheless, weak financial conditions of schools are likely to stimulate itself to transfer all the costs to the victims in school accidents. 基于法经济学的角度分析中小学校园事故中学校责任承担的困境","PeriodicalId":135635,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2019 4th International Conference on Humanities Science and Society Development (ICHSSD 2019)","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of the difficulties primary and secondary schools have in school accidents based on economics of law\",\"authors\":\"Chen Zeng\",\"doi\":\"10.2991/ICHSSD-19.2019.108\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Primary and secondary school accidents involve many conflicting interests, complex relations and have a big social impact. While the whole society emphasizes the protection of the interests of minors, the interests of the school, as the main body of responsibility distribution, are often ignored. This paper intends to analyze the dilemma of school to undertake responsibility in primary and secondary school accidents from the perspective of law and economics, and holds that the ambiguity of legislation makes the judges have to refer to administrative norms in the practice of hearing school accidents. However, administrative norms with different leniency and strictness give rise to a large number of similar cases with different judgments. The Tort Law, based on civil law principles, confirms schools’ liability for accidents on campus in order to protect the interests of minors. Nevertheless, weak financial conditions of schools are likely to stimulate itself to transfer all the costs to the victims in school accidents. 基于法经济学的角度分析中小学校园事故中学校责任承担的困境\",\"PeriodicalId\":135635,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2019 4th International Conference on Humanities Science and Society Development (ICHSSD 2019)\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2019 4th International Conference on Humanities Science and Society Development (ICHSSD 2019)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2991/ICHSSD-19.2019.108\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2019 4th International Conference on Humanities Science and Society Development (ICHSSD 2019)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/ICHSSD-19.2019.108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

中小学事故涉及的利益冲突多,关系复杂,社会影响大。在整个社会都在强调对未成年人利益的保护的同时,学校作为责任分配的主体,其利益往往被忽视。本文拟从法学和经济学的角度分析中小学事故中学校承担责任的困境,认为立法的模糊性使得法官在审理学校事故的实践中不得不参考行政规范。然而,宽严不同的行政规范导致了大量判决不同的同类案件。《侵权行为法》以民法原则为基础,明确了学校对校园事故的责任,以保护未成年人的利益。然而,学校薄弱的财政状况很可能会刺激自己将所有成本转移到学校事故的受害者身上。基于法经济学的角度分析中小学校园事故中学校责任承担的困境
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of the difficulties primary and secondary schools have in school accidents based on economics of law
Primary and secondary school accidents involve many conflicting interests, complex relations and have a big social impact. While the whole society emphasizes the protection of the interests of minors, the interests of the school, as the main body of responsibility distribution, are often ignored. This paper intends to analyze the dilemma of school to undertake responsibility in primary and secondary school accidents from the perspective of law and economics, and holds that the ambiguity of legislation makes the judges have to refer to administrative norms in the practice of hearing school accidents. However, administrative norms with different leniency and strictness give rise to a large number of similar cases with different judgments. The Tort Law, based on civil law principles, confirms schools’ liability for accidents on campus in order to protect the interests of minors. Nevertheless, weak financial conditions of schools are likely to stimulate itself to transfer all the costs to the victims in school accidents. 基于法经济学的角度分析中小学校园事故中学校责任承担的困境
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信