{"title":"面向对象的操作系统:一种新兴的设计方法","authors":"A. Pashtan","doi":"10.1145/800174.809777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Object oriented design of operating systems has evolved from pure protection considerations to a more general methodology of design as exemplified in Intel's iAPX-432 machine. This paper compares and contrasts, from an architectural point of view, eight major object oriented operating systems. Five different architectural aspects have been chosen as a basis for this analysis. These aspects include: uniformity of the object approach, object type extensibility, the process concept, the domain concept, and object implementation techniques.","PeriodicalId":321698,"journal":{"name":"ACM '82","volume":"2000 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Object oriented operating systems: An emerging design methodology\",\"authors\":\"A. Pashtan\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/800174.809777\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Object oriented design of operating systems has evolved from pure protection considerations to a more general methodology of design as exemplified in Intel's iAPX-432 machine. This paper compares and contrasts, from an architectural point of view, eight major object oriented operating systems. Five different architectural aspects have been chosen as a basis for this analysis. These aspects include: uniformity of the object approach, object type extensibility, the process concept, the domain concept, and object implementation techniques.\",\"PeriodicalId\":321698,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM '82\",\"volume\":\"2000 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM '82\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/800174.809777\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM '82","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/800174.809777","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Object oriented operating systems: An emerging design methodology
Object oriented design of operating systems has evolved from pure protection considerations to a more general methodology of design as exemplified in Intel's iAPX-432 machine. This paper compares and contrasts, from an architectural point of view, eight major object oriented operating systems. Five different architectural aspects have been chosen as a basis for this analysis. These aspects include: uniformity of the object approach, object type extensibility, the process concept, the domain concept, and object implementation techniques.