PyLocky勒索软件源代码分析

Adam Sorini, Gavin D. Scott
{"title":"PyLocky勒索软件源代码分析","authors":"Adam Sorini, Gavin D. Scott","doi":"10.1109/SPCE50045.2020.9296183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present an analysis of a recently developed ransomware called “PyLocky.” We first provide an overview of existing tools that may help companies or individuals recover from a “PyLocky.” attack. We also explain the limitations and operating principles of the recovery tools. We next analyze the PyLocky source code, which is now publicly available, and address numerous implementation flaws that may be exploited to speed up a brute force known-plaintext attack on the ransomware’s “two-key triple-DES” encryption scheme. The analysis illustrates general flaws in implementing cryptographic protocols that should be avoided by all software developers. Finally, we note a potentially useful cyber forensic attack on PyLocky that could be helpful for recovery efforts.","PeriodicalId":426226,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE Symposium on Product Compliance Engineering - (SPCE Portland)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PyLocky Ransomware Source Code Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Adam Sorini, Gavin D. Scott\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SPCE50045.2020.9296183\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We present an analysis of a recently developed ransomware called “PyLocky.” We first provide an overview of existing tools that may help companies or individuals recover from a “PyLocky.” attack. We also explain the limitations and operating principles of the recovery tools. We next analyze the PyLocky source code, which is now publicly available, and address numerous implementation flaws that may be exploited to speed up a brute force known-plaintext attack on the ransomware’s “two-key triple-DES” encryption scheme. The analysis illustrates general flaws in implementing cryptographic protocols that should be avoided by all software developers. Finally, we note a potentially useful cyber forensic attack on PyLocky that could be helpful for recovery efforts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":426226,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 IEEE Symposium on Product Compliance Engineering - (SPCE Portland)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 IEEE Symposium on Product Compliance Engineering - (SPCE Portland)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SPCE50045.2020.9296183\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE Symposium on Product Compliance Engineering - (SPCE Portland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SPCE50045.2020.9296183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们对最近开发的勒索软件“PyLocky”进行了分析。我们首先提供了现有工具的概述,这些工具可以帮助公司或个人从“PyLocky”中恢复过来。”攻击。我们还解释了恢复工具的局限性和操作原理。接下来,我们将分析PyLocky源代码,该源代码现已公开,并解决许多可能被利用的实现缺陷,以加速对勒索软件的“双密钥三des”加密方案的暴力破解已知明文攻击。分析说明了所有软件开发人员应该避免的实现加密协议的一般缺陷。最后,我们注意到对PyLocky的潜在有用的网络取证攻击可能有助于恢复工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PyLocky Ransomware Source Code Analysis
We present an analysis of a recently developed ransomware called “PyLocky.” We first provide an overview of existing tools that may help companies or individuals recover from a “PyLocky.” attack. We also explain the limitations and operating principles of the recovery tools. We next analyze the PyLocky source code, which is now publicly available, and address numerous implementation flaws that may be exploited to speed up a brute force known-plaintext attack on the ransomware’s “two-key triple-DES” encryption scheme. The analysis illustrates general flaws in implementing cryptographic protocols that should be avoided by all software developers. Finally, we note a potentially useful cyber forensic attack on PyLocky that could be helpful for recovery efforts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信