{"title":"基于衰落和间隔时间统计的罗利衰落信道ARQ协议的全程估计","authors":"L. Chang","doi":"10.1109/ICC.1990.117291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The throughput for a system using Go-Back-N or selective repeat protocols with Rayleigh fading in both directions of transmission is approximated by using fade- and interfade-duration statistics of a multipath channel. The retransmission for Go-Back-N is based on a time-out concept; for selective repeat it is based on either time-out or negative acknowledge. The estimated results on throughput agree well with simulation results. It is found that, for a slow fading channel (e.g. fading rate=1.34 Hz, encountered by a user at 1 mile/hr walking speed and 900-MHz carrier frequency), the throughput of Go-Back-N is only slightly inferior. This comparatively equal performance results from the burstiness of the channel bit errors. On the other hand, for a fast fading channel (e.g. fading rate=80 Hz), the throughput using selective repeat is significantly superior.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":126008,"journal":{"name":"IEEE International Conference on Communications, Including Supercomm Technical Sessions","volume":"103 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Throughout estimation of ARQ protocols for Raleigh fading channel using fade- and interfade-duration statistics\",\"authors\":\"L. Chang\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICC.1990.117291\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The throughput for a system using Go-Back-N or selective repeat protocols with Rayleigh fading in both directions of transmission is approximated by using fade- and interfade-duration statistics of a multipath channel. The retransmission for Go-Back-N is based on a time-out concept; for selective repeat it is based on either time-out or negative acknowledge. The estimated results on throughput agree well with simulation results. It is found that, for a slow fading channel (e.g. fading rate=1.34 Hz, encountered by a user at 1 mile/hr walking speed and 900-MHz carrier frequency), the throughput of Go-Back-N is only slightly inferior. This comparatively equal performance results from the burstiness of the channel bit errors. On the other hand, for a fast fading channel (e.g. fading rate=80 Hz), the throughput using selective repeat is significantly superior.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":126008,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE International Conference on Communications, Including Supercomm Technical Sessions\",\"volume\":\"103 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE International Conference on Communications, Including Supercomm Technical Sessions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICC.1990.117291\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE International Conference on Communications, Including Supercomm Technical Sessions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICC.1990.117291","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Throughout estimation of ARQ protocols for Raleigh fading channel using fade- and interfade-duration statistics
The throughput for a system using Go-Back-N or selective repeat protocols with Rayleigh fading in both directions of transmission is approximated by using fade- and interfade-duration statistics of a multipath channel. The retransmission for Go-Back-N is based on a time-out concept; for selective repeat it is based on either time-out or negative acknowledge. The estimated results on throughput agree well with simulation results. It is found that, for a slow fading channel (e.g. fading rate=1.34 Hz, encountered by a user at 1 mile/hr walking speed and 900-MHz carrier frequency), the throughput of Go-Back-N is only slightly inferior. This comparatively equal performance results from the burstiness of the channel bit errors. On the other hand, for a fast fading channel (e.g. fading rate=80 Hz), the throughput using selective repeat is significantly superior.<>