A. Rehman, Laiq Hassan, Nasir Ahmad, Kashif Ahmad, Shakirullah Shakirullah
{"title":"支持向量机与汉明距离用于虹膜识别的比较研究","authors":"A. Rehman, Laiq Hassan, Nasir Ahmad, Kashif Ahmad, Shakirullah Shakirullah","doi":"10.25211/jeas.v34i1.22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a comparative study of two well-known classification techniques of iris patterns, along with detailed description of some preprocessing steps. In preprocessing stage, Circular Hough Transform and Canny Edge Detector are employed for iris segmentation, while for iris normalization and feature extraction, the Rubber Sheet Model and one-dimensional (1-D) Log-Gabor Filter are used respectively. Finally for classification/matching of iris patterns, Hamming Distance and Support Vector Machine (SVM) are applied. The evaluation results on CASIA V.1 dataset show that Hamming distance algorithm is more suitable for the classification (with average accuracy of 93.85 %) of iris patterns.","PeriodicalId":167225,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences , University of Engineering and Technology, Peshawar","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE AND HAMMING DISTANCE USED FOR IRIS RECOGNITION\",\"authors\":\"A. Rehman, Laiq Hassan, Nasir Ahmad, Kashif Ahmad, Shakirullah Shakirullah\",\"doi\":\"10.25211/jeas.v34i1.22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents a comparative study of two well-known classification techniques of iris patterns, along with detailed description of some preprocessing steps. In preprocessing stage, Circular Hough Transform and Canny Edge Detector are employed for iris segmentation, while for iris normalization and feature extraction, the Rubber Sheet Model and one-dimensional (1-D) Log-Gabor Filter are used respectively. Finally for classification/matching of iris patterns, Hamming Distance and Support Vector Machine (SVM) are applied. The evaluation results on CASIA V.1 dataset show that Hamming distance algorithm is more suitable for the classification (with average accuracy of 93.85 %) of iris patterns.\",\"PeriodicalId\":167225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences , University of Engineering and Technology, Peshawar\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences , University of Engineering and Technology, Peshawar\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25211/jeas.v34i1.22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences , University of Engineering and Technology, Peshawar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25211/jeas.v34i1.22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE AND HAMMING DISTANCE USED FOR IRIS RECOGNITION
This paper presents a comparative study of two well-known classification techniques of iris patterns, along with detailed description of some preprocessing steps. In preprocessing stage, Circular Hough Transform and Canny Edge Detector are employed for iris segmentation, while for iris normalization and feature extraction, the Rubber Sheet Model and one-dimensional (1-D) Log-Gabor Filter are used respectively. Finally for classification/matching of iris patterns, Hamming Distance and Support Vector Machine (SVM) are applied. The evaluation results on CASIA V.1 dataset show that Hamming distance algorithm is more suitable for the classification (with average accuracy of 93.85 %) of iris patterns.