市场存贷款失衡与银行并购结果

Leonid Pugachev
{"title":"市场存贷款失衡与银行并购结果","authors":"Leonid Pugachev","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3916274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Evidence on how bank merger and acquisition (M&A) affects bank customers is mixed. I reexamine deposit and loan volumes and prices around all 2,673 ownership-changing U.S. bank M&As between 1998 and 2016. M&A impacts target markets differently based on their deposit-loan imbalance. In markets where loans are scarce relative to deposits, acquirers lend more and gather fewer deposits; where deposits are scarce, the opposite holds. Incumbents counteract these changes but acquirer effects dominate. Thus, M&A equilibrates markets, reducing deposit-loan imbalances. Equilibration predicts better economic outcomes. Deposit and loan price analysis is inconclusive. Results support a welfare-enhancing view of bank M&A.","PeriodicalId":448854,"journal":{"name":"Fifth Singapore International Conference on Finance 2011 (Archive)","volume":"1971 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Market Deposit-Loan Imbalances and Bank M&A Outcomes\",\"authors\":\"Leonid Pugachev\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3916274\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Evidence on how bank merger and acquisition (M&A) affects bank customers is mixed. I reexamine deposit and loan volumes and prices around all 2,673 ownership-changing U.S. bank M&As between 1998 and 2016. M&A impacts target markets differently based on their deposit-loan imbalance. In markets where loans are scarce relative to deposits, acquirers lend more and gather fewer deposits; where deposits are scarce, the opposite holds. Incumbents counteract these changes but acquirer effects dominate. Thus, M&A equilibrates markets, reducing deposit-loan imbalances. Equilibration predicts better economic outcomes. Deposit and loan price analysis is inconclusive. Results support a welfare-enhancing view of bank M&A.\",\"PeriodicalId\":448854,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fifth Singapore International Conference on Finance 2011 (Archive)\",\"volume\":\"1971 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fifth Singapore International Conference on Finance 2011 (Archive)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3916274\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fifth Singapore International Conference on Finance 2011 (Archive)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3916274","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于银行并购如何影响银行客户的证据参差不齐。我重新研究了1998年至2016年期间所有2673起所有权变更的美国银行并购的存贷款数量和价格。并购对目标市场的影响取决于目标市场的存贷不平衡。在贷款相对于存款稀缺的市场中,收购方放贷更多,吸收的存款更少;在矿藏稀少的地方,情况正好相反。现有企业抵消了这些变化,但收购者效应占主导地位。因此,并购平衡了市场,减少了存贷款失衡。均衡预示着更好的经济结果。存贷款价格分析尚无定论。研究结果支持了银行并购的福利增强观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Market Deposit-Loan Imbalances and Bank M&A Outcomes
Evidence on how bank merger and acquisition (M&A) affects bank customers is mixed. I reexamine deposit and loan volumes and prices around all 2,673 ownership-changing U.S. bank M&As between 1998 and 2016. M&A impacts target markets differently based on their deposit-loan imbalance. In markets where loans are scarce relative to deposits, acquirers lend more and gather fewer deposits; where deposits are scarce, the opposite holds. Incumbents counteract these changes but acquirer effects dominate. Thus, M&A equilibrates markets, reducing deposit-loan imbalances. Equilibration predicts better economic outcomes. Deposit and loan price analysis is inconclusive. Results support a welfare-enhancing view of bank M&A.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信