基于模型的危险和可操作性分析测试中的安全关键系统建模

Chang Rao, Jin Guo, Nan Li, Yu Lei, Yadong Zhang, Yao Li
{"title":"基于模型的危险和可操作性分析测试中的安全关键系统建模","authors":"Chang Rao, Jin Guo, Nan Li, Yu Lei, Yadong Zhang, Yao Li","doi":"10.1109/QRS.2018.00053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Model-based testing (MBT) generates tests from behavioral models of systems. When applying MBT to safety-critical systems, one problem is that textual requirements from which the ehavior model is generated focus on commonly used scenarios while missing other scenarios that may lead to hazards. We propose to combine MBT with a hazard analysis technique, HAZard and OPerability analysis. We first derive guide phrases from original requirements, and use these phrases to extend original requirements by adding more alternative scenarios. Second, we create timed automata from the extended requirements. Third, we validate the automata with model checking. We report a case study where our approach was applied to train control system. We created two groups of automata from original and extended requirements, respectively. We found that the automata created from extended requirements are more likely to avoid problems such as deadlock. Furthermore, tests generated from such models cover more system behaviors.","PeriodicalId":114973,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security (QRS)","volume":"67 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety-Critical System Modeling in Model-Based Testing with Hazard and Operability Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Chang Rao, Jin Guo, Nan Li, Yu Lei, Yadong Zhang, Yao Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/QRS.2018.00053\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Model-based testing (MBT) generates tests from behavioral models of systems. When applying MBT to safety-critical systems, one problem is that textual requirements from which the ehavior model is generated focus on commonly used scenarios while missing other scenarios that may lead to hazards. We propose to combine MBT with a hazard analysis technique, HAZard and OPerability analysis. We first derive guide phrases from original requirements, and use these phrases to extend original requirements by adding more alternative scenarios. Second, we create timed automata from the extended requirements. Third, we validate the automata with model checking. We report a case study where our approach was applied to train control system. We created two groups of automata from original and extended requirements, respectively. We found that the automata created from extended requirements are more likely to avoid problems such as deadlock. Furthermore, tests generated from such models cover more system behaviors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":114973,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 IEEE International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security (QRS)\",\"volume\":\"67 1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 IEEE International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security (QRS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/QRS.2018.00053\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security (QRS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/QRS.2018.00053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

基于模型的测试(MBT)从系统的行为模型生成测试。当将MBT应用于安全关键型系统时,一个问题是生成行为模型的文本需求侧重于常用场景,而忽略了可能导致危险的其他场景。我们建议将MBT与危害分析技术,危害和可操作性分析相结合。我们首先从原始需求中获得指导短语,并使用这些短语通过添加更多可选场景来扩展原始需求。其次,我们根据扩展的需求创建时间自动机。第三,我们用模型检查来验证自动机。我们报告了一个将我们的方法应用于列车控制系统的案例研究。我们分别根据原始需求和扩展需求创建了两组自动机。我们发现,从扩展需求创建的自动机更有可能避免死锁等问题。此外,由这些模型生成的测试涵盖了更多的系统行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Safety-Critical System Modeling in Model-Based Testing with Hazard and Operability Analysis
Model-based testing (MBT) generates tests from behavioral models of systems. When applying MBT to safety-critical systems, one problem is that textual requirements from which the ehavior model is generated focus on commonly used scenarios while missing other scenarios that may lead to hazards. We propose to combine MBT with a hazard analysis technique, HAZard and OPerability analysis. We first derive guide phrases from original requirements, and use these phrases to extend original requirements by adding more alternative scenarios. Second, we create timed automata from the extended requirements. Third, we validate the automata with model checking. We report a case study where our approach was applied to train control system. We created two groups of automata from original and extended requirements, respectively. We found that the automata created from extended requirements are more likely to avoid problems such as deadlock. Furthermore, tests generated from such models cover more system behaviors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信