顺势疗法:机构信誉的丧失

J. Valverde
{"title":"顺势疗法:机构信誉的丧失","authors":"J. Valverde","doi":"10.3233/PPL-2011-0315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The conclusions of The House of Commons Science and Technology Committee report examining the policy on homeopathy, it is a careful and thoughtful analysis. It is the best example of the responsibility of the Parliaments for protects the health right of the patients. His proposals will be valid for all the countries and will be global principle for regulation. It is unacceptable for the National Health Authorities to license placebo products conferring upon them some of the status of medicines. Even if medical claims on labels are prohibited, the official licensing itself lends direct credibility to a product. Licensing paves the way for retail in pharmacies and consequently the patient’s view of the credibility of homeopathy may be further enhanced. The Governments runs the risk of endorsing homeopathy as an efficacious system of medicine. It is time to break this chain. Homeopathy should not be funded and the Agencies of Medicaments should stop licensing homeopathic products. Not changes the actual situation will lose the credibility of the Health Institutions. It is one more political inconsistency.","PeriodicalId":348240,"journal":{"name":"Pharmaceuticals, policy and law","volume":"137 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Homeopathy: The lost of credibility of the Institutions\",\"authors\":\"J. Valverde\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/PPL-2011-0315\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The conclusions of The House of Commons Science and Technology Committee report examining the policy on homeopathy, it is a careful and thoughtful analysis. It is the best example of the responsibility of the Parliaments for protects the health right of the patients. His proposals will be valid for all the countries and will be global principle for regulation. It is unacceptable for the National Health Authorities to license placebo products conferring upon them some of the status of medicines. Even if medical claims on labels are prohibited, the official licensing itself lends direct credibility to a product. Licensing paves the way for retail in pharmacies and consequently the patient’s view of the credibility of homeopathy may be further enhanced. The Governments runs the risk of endorsing homeopathy as an efficacious system of medicine. It is time to break this chain. Homeopathy should not be funded and the Agencies of Medicaments should stop licensing homeopathic products. Not changes the actual situation will lose the credibility of the Health Institutions. It is one more political inconsistency.\",\"PeriodicalId\":348240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmaceuticals, policy and law\",\"volume\":\"137 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmaceuticals, policy and law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/PPL-2011-0315\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmaceuticals, policy and law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/PPL-2011-0315","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

下议院科学和技术委员会的结论报告审查顺势疗法的政策,这是一个仔细和深思熟虑的分析。这是议会有责任保护病人健康权的最好例子。他的建议将适用于所有国家,并将成为全球监管的原则。国家卫生当局给安慰剂产品颁发许可证,赋予它们某种药物地位,这是不可接受的。即使标签上的医疗声明是被禁止的,官方许可本身也为产品提供了直接的可信度。发牌为药店零售铺平了道路,因此病人对顺势疗法的可信度的看法可能会进一步提高。政府冒着赞同顺势疗法作为一种有效的医学体系的风险。是时候打破这个链条了。顺势疗法不应该被资助,药物机构应该停止许可顺势疗法产品。不改变实际情况就会失去卫生机构的信誉。这是又一个政治矛盾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Homeopathy: The lost of credibility of the Institutions
The conclusions of The House of Commons Science and Technology Committee report examining the policy on homeopathy, it is a careful and thoughtful analysis. It is the best example of the responsibility of the Parliaments for protects the health right of the patients. His proposals will be valid for all the countries and will be global principle for regulation. It is unacceptable for the National Health Authorities to license placebo products conferring upon them some of the status of medicines. Even if medical claims on labels are prohibited, the official licensing itself lends direct credibility to a product. Licensing paves the way for retail in pharmacies and consequently the patient’s view of the credibility of homeopathy may be further enhanced. The Governments runs the risk of endorsing homeopathy as an efficacious system of medicine. It is time to break this chain. Homeopathy should not be funded and the Agencies of Medicaments should stop licensing homeopathic products. Not changes the actual situation will lose the credibility of the Health Institutions. It is one more political inconsistency.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信