{"title":"污染气道气管插管和英国护理人员净化的有效性(Satiated2):一项随机对照人体研究","authors":"G. McClelland, R. Pilbery, S. Hepburn","doi":"10.33151/ajp.17.783","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Vomiting and regurgitation are commonly encountered in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, but traditional paramedic suctioning techniques may be insufficient to manage severely soiled airways. The Suction Assisted Laryngoscopy and Airway Decontamination (SALAD) technique was developed to help clinicians manage soiled airways. SATIATED2 reports the impact of SALAD training in North East Ambulance Service (NEAS) in the United Kingdom following the original SATIATED study in the Yorkshire Ambulance Service. The primary research question was: Among NEAS paramedics, does the addition of SALAD training, compared to standard training, improve the success rate of intubation for the soiled airway? Methods A randomised controlled trial of SALAD was conducted using a modified airway manikin capable of vomiting. The intervention comprised SALAD training and the introduction of the DuCanto catheter. Paramedic volunteers were block randomised into two groups: A01A02B01 who made two pre-training intubation attempts and one post-training attempt, and A11B11B12, who made one pre-training and two post-training attempts. The primary outcome was intubation success rate at the second attempt. The time taken to intubate was recorded as a secondary outcome. SATIATED2 was registered with ISRCTN (ISRCTN17329526) and funded internally with commercial support from SSCOR who supplied the DuCanto catheters. Results One-hundred and two paramedics (51 AAB, 51 ABB) were recruited between August and December 2019 with 99 participating (50 AAB, 49 ABB). The primary outcome was intubation success rate on the second attempt (A02 vs. B11) which were 86% without SALAD and 96% with SALAD; a non-significant improvement of 10% (95% CI: 1–21, p=0.09). The total intubation success rate pre-training (A01+A02+A11) was 75% (112/149) compared with 98% (145/148) post-training (B01+B11+B12). Conclusion NEAS paramedics demonstrated improved, but non-significant, intubation success rates in a simulated soiled airway following SALAD training.","PeriodicalId":340334,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Paramedicine","volume":"103 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Soiled Airway Tracheal Intubation and the Effectiveness of Decontamination by United Kingdom Paramedics (Satiated2): A Randomised Controlled Manikin Study\",\"authors\":\"G. McClelland, R. Pilbery, S. Hepburn\",\"doi\":\"10.33151/ajp.17.783\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction Vomiting and regurgitation are commonly encountered in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, but traditional paramedic suctioning techniques may be insufficient to manage severely soiled airways. The Suction Assisted Laryngoscopy and Airway Decontamination (SALAD) technique was developed to help clinicians manage soiled airways. SATIATED2 reports the impact of SALAD training in North East Ambulance Service (NEAS) in the United Kingdom following the original SATIATED study in the Yorkshire Ambulance Service. The primary research question was: Among NEAS paramedics, does the addition of SALAD training, compared to standard training, improve the success rate of intubation for the soiled airway? Methods A randomised controlled trial of SALAD was conducted using a modified airway manikin capable of vomiting. The intervention comprised SALAD training and the introduction of the DuCanto catheter. Paramedic volunteers were block randomised into two groups: A01A02B01 who made two pre-training intubation attempts and one post-training attempt, and A11B11B12, who made one pre-training and two post-training attempts. The primary outcome was intubation success rate at the second attempt. The time taken to intubate was recorded as a secondary outcome. SATIATED2 was registered with ISRCTN (ISRCTN17329526) and funded internally with commercial support from SSCOR who supplied the DuCanto catheters. Results One-hundred and two paramedics (51 AAB, 51 ABB) were recruited between August and December 2019 with 99 participating (50 AAB, 49 ABB). The primary outcome was intubation success rate on the second attempt (A02 vs. B11) which were 86% without SALAD and 96% with SALAD; a non-significant improvement of 10% (95% CI: 1–21, p=0.09). The total intubation success rate pre-training (A01+A02+A11) was 75% (112/149) compared with 98% (145/148) post-training (B01+B11+B12). Conclusion NEAS paramedics demonstrated improved, but non-significant, intubation success rates in a simulated soiled airway following SALAD training.\",\"PeriodicalId\":340334,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of Paramedicine\",\"volume\":\"103 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of Paramedicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33151/ajp.17.783\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Paramedicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33151/ajp.17.783","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
院外心脏骤停常见呕吐和反流,但传统的医护人员吸痰技术可能不足以处理严重污染的气道。吸气辅助喉镜和气道净化(沙拉)技术的发展,以帮助临床医生管理污染的气道。SATIATED2报告了沙拉培训在英国东北救护车服务(NEAS)的影响,随后在约克郡救护车服务进行了最初的SATIATED研究。主要研究问题是:在NEAS护理人员中,与标准培训相比,增加沙拉培训是否提高了污染气道插管的成功率?方法采用改良的可呕吐气道人体模型对沙拉进行随机对照试验。干预包括沙拉训练和DuCanto导管的引入。护理人员志愿者被随机分为两组:A01A02B01进行两次训练前插管尝试和一次训练后插管尝试,A11B11B12进行一次训练前插管尝试和两次训练后插管尝试。主要观察指标为第二次插管成功率。记录插管时间作为次要结果。SATIATED2已在ISRCTN注册(ISRCTN17329526),并在提供DuCanto导管的SSCOR的商业支持下获得内部资助。结果2019年8 - 12月共招募护理人员102名(普通护士51名,ABB护士51名),其中99名(普通护士50名,ABB护士49名)。主要结果为第二次插管成功率(A02 vs B11),其中不加沙拉的插管成功率为86%,加沙拉的插管成功率为96%;无显著性改善10% (95% CI: 1-21, p=0.09)。培训前(A01+A02+A11)总插管成功率为75%(112/149),培训后(B01+B11+B12)总插管成功率为98%(145/148)。结论经沙拉训练后,NEAS医护人员在模拟脏污气道插管成功率有所提高,但并不显著。
Soiled Airway Tracheal Intubation and the Effectiveness of Decontamination by United Kingdom Paramedics (Satiated2): A Randomised Controlled Manikin Study
Introduction Vomiting and regurgitation are commonly encountered in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, but traditional paramedic suctioning techniques may be insufficient to manage severely soiled airways. The Suction Assisted Laryngoscopy and Airway Decontamination (SALAD) technique was developed to help clinicians manage soiled airways. SATIATED2 reports the impact of SALAD training in North East Ambulance Service (NEAS) in the United Kingdom following the original SATIATED study in the Yorkshire Ambulance Service. The primary research question was: Among NEAS paramedics, does the addition of SALAD training, compared to standard training, improve the success rate of intubation for the soiled airway? Methods A randomised controlled trial of SALAD was conducted using a modified airway manikin capable of vomiting. The intervention comprised SALAD training and the introduction of the DuCanto catheter. Paramedic volunteers were block randomised into two groups: A01A02B01 who made two pre-training intubation attempts and one post-training attempt, and A11B11B12, who made one pre-training and two post-training attempts. The primary outcome was intubation success rate at the second attempt. The time taken to intubate was recorded as a secondary outcome. SATIATED2 was registered with ISRCTN (ISRCTN17329526) and funded internally with commercial support from SSCOR who supplied the DuCanto catheters. Results One-hundred and two paramedics (51 AAB, 51 ABB) were recruited between August and December 2019 with 99 participating (50 AAB, 49 ABB). The primary outcome was intubation success rate on the second attempt (A02 vs. B11) which were 86% without SALAD and 96% with SALAD; a non-significant improvement of 10% (95% CI: 1–21, p=0.09). The total intubation success rate pre-training (A01+A02+A11) was 75% (112/149) compared with 98% (145/148) post-training (B01+B11+B12). Conclusion NEAS paramedics demonstrated improved, but non-significant, intubation success rates in a simulated soiled airway following SALAD training.