Brice A. Elono Ongbwa, A. Kora, Walter L. Ngouamo Tateu
{"title":"3G/4G移动网络室内射频覆盖评估的改进","authors":"Brice A. Elono Ongbwa, A. Kora, Walter L. Ngouamo Tateu","doi":"10.1109/icfsp48124.2019.8938041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most of mobile communications are done inside buildings and telecom operators pay close attention on indoor Radio Frequency (RF) coverage in order to provide suitable Quality of Service (QoS) and Quality of Experience (QoE). Due to buildings openings, huge signal attenuation can be observed depending on the height at which the Mobile Equipment (ME) is located from the ground. Unfortunately, RF engineers pay less attention to this height selection, and this can greatly impact the reliability of results. In addition, Special Drive Test Route (SDTR) provides good results for indoor RF coverage assessment as compared to random methods, but the impact of itineraries direction was not covered. Thus, the impacts of mobile equipment height position from ground and SDTR itineraries direction have been deeply studied. As a result, worst signal power is always observed when the ME is located at ground level and we recommend this position as reference while performing indoor RF coverage assessment. Also, by carefully choosing itinerary path direction, results reliability can be improved by 67.5%.","PeriodicalId":162584,"journal":{"name":"2019 5th International Conference on Frontiers of Signal Processing (ICFSP)","volume":"332 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improvement of Indoor RF Coverage Assessment in 3G/4G Mobile Networks\",\"authors\":\"Brice A. Elono Ongbwa, A. Kora, Walter L. Ngouamo Tateu\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/icfsp48124.2019.8938041\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Most of mobile communications are done inside buildings and telecom operators pay close attention on indoor Radio Frequency (RF) coverage in order to provide suitable Quality of Service (QoS) and Quality of Experience (QoE). Due to buildings openings, huge signal attenuation can be observed depending on the height at which the Mobile Equipment (ME) is located from the ground. Unfortunately, RF engineers pay less attention to this height selection, and this can greatly impact the reliability of results. In addition, Special Drive Test Route (SDTR) provides good results for indoor RF coverage assessment as compared to random methods, but the impact of itineraries direction was not covered. Thus, the impacts of mobile equipment height position from ground and SDTR itineraries direction have been deeply studied. As a result, worst signal power is always observed when the ME is located at ground level and we recommend this position as reference while performing indoor RF coverage assessment. Also, by carefully choosing itinerary path direction, results reliability can be improved by 67.5%.\",\"PeriodicalId\":162584,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 5th International Conference on Frontiers of Signal Processing (ICFSP)\",\"volume\":\"332 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 5th International Conference on Frontiers of Signal Processing (ICFSP)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/icfsp48124.2019.8938041\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 5th International Conference on Frontiers of Signal Processing (ICFSP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/icfsp48124.2019.8938041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
大多数移动通信是在建筑物内进行的,电信运营商密切关注室内射频(RF)覆盖,以提供适当的服务质量(QoS)和体验质量(QoE)。由于建筑物开口,可观察到巨大的信号衰减,这取决于移动设备(ME)距离地面的高度。不幸的是,射频工程师很少关注这种高度选择,这可能会极大地影响结果的可靠性。此外,与随机方法相比,特殊驾驶测试路线(Special Drive Test Route, SDTR)提供了较好的室内射频覆盖评估结果,但未考虑路线方向的影响。因此,深入研究了移动设备高度、离地位置和SDTR行程方向的影响。因此,当ME位于地面水平时,总是观察到最差的信号功率,我们建议在进行室内射频覆盖评估时将此位置作为参考。通过对行程路径方向的合理选择,结果的可靠性可提高67.5%。
Improvement of Indoor RF Coverage Assessment in 3G/4G Mobile Networks
Most of mobile communications are done inside buildings and telecom operators pay close attention on indoor Radio Frequency (RF) coverage in order to provide suitable Quality of Service (QoS) and Quality of Experience (QoE). Due to buildings openings, huge signal attenuation can be observed depending on the height at which the Mobile Equipment (ME) is located from the ground. Unfortunately, RF engineers pay less attention to this height selection, and this can greatly impact the reliability of results. In addition, Special Drive Test Route (SDTR) provides good results for indoor RF coverage assessment as compared to random methods, but the impact of itineraries direction was not covered. Thus, the impacts of mobile equipment height position from ground and SDTR itineraries direction have been deeply studied. As a result, worst signal power is always observed when the ME is located at ground level and we recommend this position as reference while performing indoor RF coverage assessment. Also, by carefully choosing itinerary path direction, results reliability can be improved by 67.5%.