社论:用于人类健康的基于物质的医疗器械:有效性、安全性和可持续性的挑战

A. Mugelli, J. Tamargo
{"title":"社论:用于人类健康的基于物质的医疗器械:有效性、安全性和可持续性的挑战","authors":"A. Mugelli, J. Tamargo","doi":"10.3389/fdsfr.2023.1222790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Alessandro Mugelli and Juan Tamargo Treatments without scientific proof of efficacy and safety are offered to and often used by individuals for their medical needs. Substance-based medical devices (SBMDs) are medical devices composed of substances or by combinations of substances as defined in Annex VIII, Rule 21 of the European Medical Device Regulation (MDR) (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/ EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32017R0745). While SBMDs are similar to medicinal products (MPs) in their presentation and pharmaceutical form, they should achieve their therapeutic effect via a “non-pharmacological, immunological, or metabolic mechanism of action.” Independently of the mechanism of action to reach their therapeutic effect, what is of utmost importance is that the therapeutic claim must be demonstrated by well-designed clinical trials and that the benefit/risk ratio reported when SBMDs are marketed should be corroborated by active postmarketing surveillance. Manufacturers must verify the quality and safety of the substances that are in the SBMD according to the EU legislation for patient safety, but this field also represents an opportunity for innovation and research. The new MDR has been in force since May 2021. As clearly reported in the perspective articles by Giovagnoni, “the MDR’s inclusion of different types of product has created a significant opportunity for innovation.” In fact, “the Regulation allowed to repurpose the therapeutic properties of natural complex substances, which were unused, or even considered complementary and alternative medicine, within an evidence-based framework and as part of the healthcare sector.” The aim of this Research Topic is to give the clear message that the healthcare system, the scientific research community, and the industry should be prepared to accept the challenges of this profound regulatory change, transforming this change into opportunities for innovation and health improvement. Interestingly, in the EU, the regulatory changes on clinical research of MPs as well as the more general regulatory framework of medical devices, and in particular of SBMDs, have OPEN ACCESS","PeriodicalId":321587,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Drug Safety and Regulation","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Editorial: Substance-based medical devices for human health: a challenge of efficacy, safety, and sustainability\",\"authors\":\"A. Mugelli, J. Tamargo\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fdsfr.2023.1222790\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Alessandro Mugelli and Juan Tamargo Treatments without scientific proof of efficacy and safety are offered to and often used by individuals for their medical needs. Substance-based medical devices (SBMDs) are medical devices composed of substances or by combinations of substances as defined in Annex VIII, Rule 21 of the European Medical Device Regulation (MDR) (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/ EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32017R0745). While SBMDs are similar to medicinal products (MPs) in their presentation and pharmaceutical form, they should achieve their therapeutic effect via a “non-pharmacological, immunological, or metabolic mechanism of action.” Independently of the mechanism of action to reach their therapeutic effect, what is of utmost importance is that the therapeutic claim must be demonstrated by well-designed clinical trials and that the benefit/risk ratio reported when SBMDs are marketed should be corroborated by active postmarketing surveillance. Manufacturers must verify the quality and safety of the substances that are in the SBMD according to the EU legislation for patient safety, but this field also represents an opportunity for innovation and research. The new MDR has been in force since May 2021. As clearly reported in the perspective articles by Giovagnoni, “the MDR’s inclusion of different types of product has created a significant opportunity for innovation.” In fact, “the Regulation allowed to repurpose the therapeutic properties of natural complex substances, which were unused, or even considered complementary and alternative medicine, within an evidence-based framework and as part of the healthcare sector.” The aim of this Research Topic is to give the clear message that the healthcare system, the scientific research community, and the industry should be prepared to accept the challenges of this profound regulatory change, transforming this change into opportunities for innovation and health improvement. Interestingly, in the EU, the regulatory changes on clinical research of MPs as well as the more general regulatory framework of medical devices, and in particular of SBMDs, have OPEN ACCESS\",\"PeriodicalId\":321587,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Drug Safety and Regulation\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Drug Safety and Regulation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fdsfr.2023.1222790\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Drug Safety and Regulation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fdsfr.2023.1222790","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

没有科学证据证明有效性和安全性的治疗方法被提供给个人,并经常被个人用于他们的医疗需求。基于物质的医疗器械(sbmd)是由欧洲医疗器械法规(MDR) (https://eur-lex.europa)附件VIII规则21中定义的物质或物质组合组成的医疗器械。欧盟/合法内容/ EN / TXT / ? uri = CELEX % 3 a32017r0745)。虽然SBMDs在外观和药物形式上与药品(MPs)相似,但它们应该通过“非药理学、免疫学或代谢作用机制”达到治疗效果。不管达到治疗效果的作用机制如何,最重要的是治疗声明必须通过精心设计的临床试验来证明,并且sbmd上市时报告的获益/风险比应该通过积极的上市后监测来证实。制造商必须根据欧盟患者安全立法验证SBMD中物质的质量和安全性,但这一领域也代表了创新和研究的机会。新的MDR自2021年5月起生效。正如Giovagnoni的观点文章中明确指出的那样,“MDR包含了不同类型的产品,这为创新创造了一个重要的机会。”事实上,“该条例允许在基于证据的框架内,作为医疗保健部门的一部分,重新利用未使用的天然复杂物质的治疗特性,甚至被认为是补充和替代药物。”本研究课题的目的是给出一个明确的信息,即医疗保健系统、科学研究界和行业应该准备好接受这种深刻的监管变革的挑战,将这种变化转化为创新和健康改善的机会。有趣的是,在欧盟,国会议员临床研究的监管变化以及医疗器械的更一般的监管框架,特别是sbmd,都是开放获取的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Editorial: Substance-based medical devices for human health: a challenge of efficacy, safety, and sustainability
Alessandro Mugelli and Juan Tamargo Treatments without scientific proof of efficacy and safety are offered to and often used by individuals for their medical needs. Substance-based medical devices (SBMDs) are medical devices composed of substances or by combinations of substances as defined in Annex VIII, Rule 21 of the European Medical Device Regulation (MDR) (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/ EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32017R0745). While SBMDs are similar to medicinal products (MPs) in their presentation and pharmaceutical form, they should achieve their therapeutic effect via a “non-pharmacological, immunological, or metabolic mechanism of action.” Independently of the mechanism of action to reach their therapeutic effect, what is of utmost importance is that the therapeutic claim must be demonstrated by well-designed clinical trials and that the benefit/risk ratio reported when SBMDs are marketed should be corroborated by active postmarketing surveillance. Manufacturers must verify the quality and safety of the substances that are in the SBMD according to the EU legislation for patient safety, but this field also represents an opportunity for innovation and research. The new MDR has been in force since May 2021. As clearly reported in the perspective articles by Giovagnoni, “the MDR’s inclusion of different types of product has created a significant opportunity for innovation.” In fact, “the Regulation allowed to repurpose the therapeutic properties of natural complex substances, which were unused, or even considered complementary and alternative medicine, within an evidence-based framework and as part of the healthcare sector.” The aim of this Research Topic is to give the clear message that the healthcare system, the scientific research community, and the industry should be prepared to accept the challenges of this profound regulatory change, transforming this change into opportunities for innovation and health improvement. Interestingly, in the EU, the regulatory changes on clinical research of MPs as well as the more general regulatory framework of medical devices, and in particular of SBMDs, have OPEN ACCESS
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信