{"title":"介绍形式语言学和计算语言学之间的相互作用","authors":"Timothée Bernard, G. Winterstein","doi":"10.15398/jlm.v10i1.325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While computational linguistics is historically rooted in formal linguistics, it might seem that the distance between these two fields has only grown larger as each field evolved. Still, whether this impression is correct or not, not all links have been cut, and new ones have appeared. Indeed, while we are currently witnessing a growing interest within formal linguistics in both explaining the remarkable successes of neural-based language models and uncovering their limitations, one should not forget the contribution to theoretical linguistics provided, for example, by the computational implementation of grammatical formalisms. And while neural-based methods have recently received the lion’s share of the public attention, interpretable models based on symbolic methods are still relevant and widely used in the natural language processing industry. The links that exist between formal and computational linguistics have been the subject of discussion for a long time. At the 2009 European Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, a workshop entitled “Interaction between Linguistics and Computational Linguistics: Virtuous, Vicious or Vacuous?” was organised. This workshop led to the publication a couple of years later of the sixth volume of Linguistic Issues in Language Technology (Baldwin and Kordoni 2011). At the centre of this publication were discussions about","PeriodicalId":403597,"journal":{"name":"J. Lang. Model.","volume":"102 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Introduction to the special section on the interaction between formal and computational linguistics\",\"authors\":\"Timothée Bernard, G. Winterstein\",\"doi\":\"10.15398/jlm.v10i1.325\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"While computational linguistics is historically rooted in formal linguistics, it might seem that the distance between these two fields has only grown larger as each field evolved. Still, whether this impression is correct or not, not all links have been cut, and new ones have appeared. Indeed, while we are currently witnessing a growing interest within formal linguistics in both explaining the remarkable successes of neural-based language models and uncovering their limitations, one should not forget the contribution to theoretical linguistics provided, for example, by the computational implementation of grammatical formalisms. And while neural-based methods have recently received the lion’s share of the public attention, interpretable models based on symbolic methods are still relevant and widely used in the natural language processing industry. The links that exist between formal and computational linguistics have been the subject of discussion for a long time. At the 2009 European Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, a workshop entitled “Interaction between Linguistics and Computational Linguistics: Virtuous, Vicious or Vacuous?” was organised. This workshop led to the publication a couple of years later of the sixth volume of Linguistic Issues in Language Technology (Baldwin and Kordoni 2011). At the centre of this publication were discussions about\",\"PeriodicalId\":403597,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"J. Lang. Model.\",\"volume\":\"102 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"J. Lang. Model.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15398/jlm.v10i1.325\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J. Lang. Model.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15398/jlm.v10i1.325","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
虽然计算语言学在历史上植根于形式语言学,但随着每个领域的发展,这两个领域之间的距离似乎只会越来越大。然而,不管这种印象是否正确,并不是所有的联系都被切断了,新的联系出现了。事实上,虽然我们目前看到形式语言学对解释基于神经的语言模型的显著成功和揭示其局限性的兴趣日益浓厚,但人们不应忘记对理论语言学的贡献,例如,语法形式主义的计算实现。虽然基于神经的方法最近受到了公众的极大关注,但基于符号方法的可解释模型仍然在自然语言处理行业中得到了广泛的应用。形式语言学和计算语言学之间存在的联系长期以来一直是讨论的主题。在2009年欧洲计算语言学协会会议上,一个名为“语言学与计算语言学的互动:良性、恶性还是空洞?”是有组织的。这次研讨会导致了几年后出版的第六卷语言技术语言学问题(Baldwin and Kordoni 2011)。本出版物的中心是关于
Introduction to the special section on the interaction between formal and computational linguistics
While computational linguistics is historically rooted in formal linguistics, it might seem that the distance between these two fields has only grown larger as each field evolved. Still, whether this impression is correct or not, not all links have been cut, and new ones have appeared. Indeed, while we are currently witnessing a growing interest within formal linguistics in both explaining the remarkable successes of neural-based language models and uncovering their limitations, one should not forget the contribution to theoretical linguistics provided, for example, by the computational implementation of grammatical formalisms. And while neural-based methods have recently received the lion’s share of the public attention, interpretable models based on symbolic methods are still relevant and widely used in the natural language processing industry. The links that exist between formal and computational linguistics have been the subject of discussion for a long time. At the 2009 European Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, a workshop entitled “Interaction between Linguistics and Computational Linguistics: Virtuous, Vicious or Vacuous?” was organised. This workshop led to the publication a couple of years later of the sixth volume of Linguistic Issues in Language Technology (Baldwin and Kordoni 2011). At the centre of this publication were discussions about