辅助重度耳鸣诊断和治疗的概念框架

M. Meikle
{"title":"辅助重度耳鸣诊断和治疗的概念框架","authors":"M. Meikle","doi":"10.1375/AUDI.24.2.59.31107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Diagnostic and treatment efforts for severe tinnitus are currently impeded by the lack of standardised methods for measuring the negative impacts of tinnitus upon the affected individuals. Such efforts could benefit from application of the World Health Organization (WHO) method for categorising the negative effects caused by chronic conditions. The WHO method starts by defining the relevant impairment (physical or mental), which leads to disability, and finally to handicap. Evaluating each patient's status using the WHO categories of impairment, disability, and handicap can facilitate diagnostic and treatment efforts by clarifying relationships between specific problems and corresponding treatment needs. Systematic classification of patients' tinnitus-related problems in this way can serve as a basis for comparing the content domains of different tinnitus questionnaires, and also can contribute unifying themes to aid in developing standardised methods for evaluating the severity of tinnitus. Such standardised measures are needed in order to provide a rational basis for stratifying patients for assignment to different treatment groups, and they will greatly facilitate meta-analyses and other types of comparison and evaluation of treatment results obtained at different centers.","PeriodicalId":114768,"journal":{"name":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Audiology","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Conceptual Framework to Aid the Diagnosis and Treatment of Severe Tinnitus\",\"authors\":\"M. Meikle\",\"doi\":\"10.1375/AUDI.24.2.59.31107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Diagnostic and treatment efforts for severe tinnitus are currently impeded by the lack of standardised methods for measuring the negative impacts of tinnitus upon the affected individuals. Such efforts could benefit from application of the World Health Organization (WHO) method for categorising the negative effects caused by chronic conditions. The WHO method starts by defining the relevant impairment (physical or mental), which leads to disability, and finally to handicap. Evaluating each patient's status using the WHO categories of impairment, disability, and handicap can facilitate diagnostic and treatment efforts by clarifying relationships between specific problems and corresponding treatment needs. Systematic classification of patients' tinnitus-related problems in this way can serve as a basis for comparing the content domains of different tinnitus questionnaires, and also can contribute unifying themes to aid in developing standardised methods for evaluating the severity of tinnitus. Such standardised measures are needed in order to provide a rational basis for stratifying patients for assignment to different treatment groups, and they will greatly facilitate meta-analyses and other types of comparison and evaluation of treatment results obtained at different centers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":114768,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Audiology\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Audiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1375/AUDI.24.2.59.31107\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1375/AUDI.24.2.59.31107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

摘要

目前,由于缺乏衡量耳鸣对患者的负面影响的标准化方法,严重耳鸣的诊断和治疗工作受到阻碍。如果采用世界卫生组织(卫生组织)对慢性病造成的负面影响进行分类的方法,这些努力将会受益。世卫组织的方法首先界定导致残疾的相关缺陷(身体或精神上的),最后界定残疾。使用世卫组织的损伤、残疾和残疾类别评估每位患者的状况,可以通过澄清具体问题与相应治疗需求之间的关系,促进诊断和治疗工作。以这种方式对患者耳鸣相关问题进行系统分类,可以作为比较不同耳鸣问卷内容域的基础,也可以为制定耳鸣严重程度评估的标准化方法提供统一的主题。这些标准化的措施是必要的,以便为患者分层分配到不同的治疗组提供合理的依据,并将极大地促进对不同中心获得的治疗结果进行meta分析和其他类型的比较和评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Conceptual Framework to Aid the Diagnosis and Treatment of Severe Tinnitus
Diagnostic and treatment efforts for severe tinnitus are currently impeded by the lack of standardised methods for measuring the negative impacts of tinnitus upon the affected individuals. Such efforts could benefit from application of the World Health Organization (WHO) method for categorising the negative effects caused by chronic conditions. The WHO method starts by defining the relevant impairment (physical or mental), which leads to disability, and finally to handicap. Evaluating each patient's status using the WHO categories of impairment, disability, and handicap can facilitate diagnostic and treatment efforts by clarifying relationships between specific problems and corresponding treatment needs. Systematic classification of patients' tinnitus-related problems in this way can serve as a basis for comparing the content domains of different tinnitus questionnaires, and also can contribute unifying themes to aid in developing standardised methods for evaluating the severity of tinnitus. Such standardised measures are needed in order to provide a rational basis for stratifying patients for assignment to different treatment groups, and they will greatly facilitate meta-analyses and other types of comparison and evaluation of treatment results obtained at different centers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信