前言及致谢

S. Grewal
{"title":"前言及致谢","authors":"S. Grewal","doi":"10.7765/9781526142726.00004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This book is the first comprehensive study of Muslim migrant integration in rural Britain across the post1960s period. It stems from an interest in both migration policies and the everyday lives of ethnic minority communities at the local level, as well as a sense that there is a need to shift the focus on British Muslims away from urban conurbations of settlement towards more nonmetropolitan and peripheral settings. It uses Wiltshire as a case study, a county in the southwest of England whose local authority and Muslim migrant populations have long recognised the inherent rurality of their local surroundings. The book draws upon both a range of previously unexplored archival material and oral histories carried out with members of the Muslim communities, and reveals what is a clear, and often complex, relationship between rurality and integration. In doing so, it challenges the longheld presumption that local authorities in more rural areas have been inactive, and even disinterested, in devising and implementing migration, integration and diversity policies, and sheds light on small and dispersed Muslim communities that have traditionally been written out of Britain’s immigration history. The study of Muslim integration in Britain in historical perspective across the post1960s period is not without its challenges and difficulties. Indeed, much of the local authority documentation drawn upon throughout this book is framed within discussions on ethnicity and race, not religion, due to religious affiliation not being considered a significant marker of identity until more recently, and since the 1990s especially. Furthermore, whilst the inherent diversity of Wiltshire’s Muslim communities’ experiences and identities is central to the book’s arguments, its focus on Muslims undoubtedly leads to the prioritisation of religion over what are other equally important components of identity, such as class, ethnicity and gender. Some challenges emerged as a result of studying Muslim populations in a more rural setting at the county level. Wiltshire’s local authority did not have one specific committee or unit that monopolised issues of migration, integration and local Muslim populations’ needs and demands. To the contrary, debates, policies and strategies permeated numerous levels of local government and a wide","PeriodicalId":231329,"journal":{"name":"Habermas and European Integration (second edition)","volume":"35 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preface and acknowledgements\",\"authors\":\"S. Grewal\",\"doi\":\"10.7765/9781526142726.00004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This book is the first comprehensive study of Muslim migrant integration in rural Britain across the post1960s period. It stems from an interest in both migration policies and the everyday lives of ethnic minority communities at the local level, as well as a sense that there is a need to shift the focus on British Muslims away from urban conurbations of settlement towards more nonmetropolitan and peripheral settings. It uses Wiltshire as a case study, a county in the southwest of England whose local authority and Muslim migrant populations have long recognised the inherent rurality of their local surroundings. The book draws upon both a range of previously unexplored archival material and oral histories carried out with members of the Muslim communities, and reveals what is a clear, and often complex, relationship between rurality and integration. In doing so, it challenges the longheld presumption that local authorities in more rural areas have been inactive, and even disinterested, in devising and implementing migration, integration and diversity policies, and sheds light on small and dispersed Muslim communities that have traditionally been written out of Britain’s immigration history. The study of Muslim integration in Britain in historical perspective across the post1960s period is not without its challenges and difficulties. Indeed, much of the local authority documentation drawn upon throughout this book is framed within discussions on ethnicity and race, not religion, due to religious affiliation not being considered a significant marker of identity until more recently, and since the 1990s especially. Furthermore, whilst the inherent diversity of Wiltshire’s Muslim communities’ experiences and identities is central to the book’s arguments, its focus on Muslims undoubtedly leads to the prioritisation of religion over what are other equally important components of identity, such as class, ethnicity and gender. Some challenges emerged as a result of studying Muslim populations in a more rural setting at the county level. Wiltshire’s local authority did not have one specific committee or unit that monopolised issues of migration, integration and local Muslim populations’ needs and demands. To the contrary, debates, policies and strategies permeated numerous levels of local government and a wide\",\"PeriodicalId\":231329,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Habermas and European Integration (second edition)\",\"volume\":\"35 1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Habermas and European Integration (second edition)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7765/9781526142726.00004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Habermas and European Integration (second edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7765/9781526142726.00004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这本书是第一本全面研究20世纪60年代后英国农村穆斯林移民融合的书。它源于对移民政策和当地少数民族社区日常生活的兴趣,以及一种感觉,即有必要将对英国穆斯林的关注从城市聚居区转移到更多的非大都市和外围环境。它以威尔特郡为例进行研究,这是英格兰西南部的一个郡,其地方当局和穆斯林移民人口长期以来一直认识到当地环境固有的乡村性。这本书借鉴了一系列以前未被探索过的档案材料和穆斯林社区成员的口述历史,揭示了农村与融合之间清晰而复杂的关系。在这样做的过程中,它挑战了长期以来的假设,即更多农村地区的地方当局在制定和实施移民、融合和多样性政策方面不活跃,甚至不感兴趣,并揭示了传统上被写在英国移民史之外的小型和分散的穆斯林社区。从历史的角度研究20世纪60年代后英国的穆斯林融合并非没有挑战和困难。事实上,本书中引用的许多地方当局文件都是在讨论民族和种族的框架内,而不是在讨论宗教的框架内,因为直到最近,特别是自20世纪90年代以来,宗教信仰才被视为身份的重要标志。此外,虽然威尔特郡穆斯林社区的经历和身份的内在多样性是本书论点的核心,但它对穆斯林的关注无疑会导致宗教优先于其他同样重要的身份组成部分,如阶级、种族和性别。由于在县一级比较农村的环境中研究穆斯林人口,出现了一些挑战。威尔特郡地方当局没有一个专门的委员会或单位来垄断移民、融合和当地穆斯林人口的需求和要求等问题。相反,辩论、政策和战略渗透到各级地方政府和广泛的领域
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Preface and acknowledgements
This book is the first comprehensive study of Muslim migrant integration in rural Britain across the post1960s period. It stems from an interest in both migration policies and the everyday lives of ethnic minority communities at the local level, as well as a sense that there is a need to shift the focus on British Muslims away from urban conurbations of settlement towards more nonmetropolitan and peripheral settings. It uses Wiltshire as a case study, a county in the southwest of England whose local authority and Muslim migrant populations have long recognised the inherent rurality of their local surroundings. The book draws upon both a range of previously unexplored archival material and oral histories carried out with members of the Muslim communities, and reveals what is a clear, and often complex, relationship between rurality and integration. In doing so, it challenges the longheld presumption that local authorities in more rural areas have been inactive, and even disinterested, in devising and implementing migration, integration and diversity policies, and sheds light on small and dispersed Muslim communities that have traditionally been written out of Britain’s immigration history. The study of Muslim integration in Britain in historical perspective across the post1960s period is not without its challenges and difficulties. Indeed, much of the local authority documentation drawn upon throughout this book is framed within discussions on ethnicity and race, not religion, due to religious affiliation not being considered a significant marker of identity until more recently, and since the 1990s especially. Furthermore, whilst the inherent diversity of Wiltshire’s Muslim communities’ experiences and identities is central to the book’s arguments, its focus on Muslims undoubtedly leads to the prioritisation of religion over what are other equally important components of identity, such as class, ethnicity and gender. Some challenges emerged as a result of studying Muslim populations in a more rural setting at the county level. Wiltshire’s local authority did not have one specific committee or unit that monopolised issues of migration, integration and local Muslim populations’ needs and demands. To the contrary, debates, policies and strategies permeated numerous levels of local government and a wide
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信