动量策略是否有利可图?最近来自欧洲市场的证据

Anastasia Slabchenko
{"title":"动量策略是否有利可图?最近来自欧洲市场的证据","authors":"Anastasia Slabchenko","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3397011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the profitability of momentum strategies for a sample of Core and Peripheral European equity markets. More specifically, a large number of strategies with different combinations of ranking and holding periods are empirically evaluated for the period between December 1989 to January 2018 for the UK, Germany, French, Sweden, the Netherlands, Italy, Spain, Greece, and Portugal. The results indicate that both the profitability and the optimal combination of ranking and holding periods of momentum strategies vary across markets.","PeriodicalId":365642,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Behavioral Finance (Microeconomics) (Topic)","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are Momentum Strategies Profitable? Recent Evidence from European Markets\",\"authors\":\"Anastasia Slabchenko\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3397011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper examines the profitability of momentum strategies for a sample of Core and Peripheral European equity markets. More specifically, a large number of strategies with different combinations of ranking and holding periods are empirically evaluated for the period between December 1989 to January 2018 for the UK, Germany, French, Sweden, the Netherlands, Italy, Spain, Greece, and Portugal. The results indicate that both the profitability and the optimal combination of ranking and holding periods of momentum strategies vary across markets.\",\"PeriodicalId\":365642,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Behavioral Finance (Microeconomics) (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Behavioral Finance (Microeconomics) (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3397011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Behavioral Finance (Microeconomics) (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3397011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文以核心和外围欧洲股票市场为样本,考察了动量策略的盈利能力。更具体地说,在1989年12月至2018年1月期间,对英国、德国、法国、瑞典、荷兰、意大利、西班牙、希腊和葡萄牙的大量具有不同排名和持股期限组合的策略进行了实证评估。结果表明,动量策略的盈利能力、排名和持股时间的最优组合在不同市场有所不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Are Momentum Strategies Profitable? Recent Evidence from European Markets
This paper examines the profitability of momentum strategies for a sample of Core and Peripheral European equity markets. More specifically, a large number of strategies with different combinations of ranking and holding periods are empirically evaluated for the period between December 1989 to January 2018 for the UK, Germany, French, Sweden, the Netherlands, Italy, Spain, Greece, and Portugal. The results indicate that both the profitability and the optimal combination of ranking and holding periods of momentum strategies vary across markets.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信