媒介重要吗?协作对视觉销售会议影响的实验

R. Pfister
{"title":"媒介重要吗?协作对视觉销售会议影响的实验","authors":"R. Pfister","doi":"10.1109/IV.2012.64","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we report on the results of an experiment simulating financial sales meetings between prospective customers and a banking advisor. The study involves 112 subjects and examines effects of interactive visual sales communication on the quality of a sales encounter. We have simulated informative sales meetings where a financial sales expert explains the functioning of a mutual fund to a potential client. We have used a 2 by 2 experiment design varying the degree of interaction (with our without customer involvement) and the medium (paper versus computer) used in the meeting. The results show that the use of customer involvement elements, that is to say joint drawing, has a significant positive effect on perceived client orientation and loyalty towards the salesperson, but not on the salesperson's (perceived) expertise and trust. It also has a positive effect on perceived empathy of the sales advisor. We also found that the use of paper sketching leads to significant increased loyalty towards the salesperson when it comes to questions as \"would you recommend this consultant?\" Computer presentations in lieu of paper sketching do not lead to significant differences in terms of the salesperson's impact on a prospect -- except if the subject has a preference for affective information processing; in this case sketching outperforms visualization software. This article has relevance for visualization scholars and practitioners, as it provides evidence that the visualization medium and its involvement level affect communication effectiveness depending on the cognitive style of the participants.","PeriodicalId":264951,"journal":{"name":"2012 16th International Conference on Information Visualisation","volume":"143 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does the Medium Matter? An Experiment on the Impact of Collaboration on Visual Sales Sessions\",\"authors\":\"R. Pfister\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IV.2012.64\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper we report on the results of an experiment simulating financial sales meetings between prospective customers and a banking advisor. The study involves 112 subjects and examines effects of interactive visual sales communication on the quality of a sales encounter. We have simulated informative sales meetings where a financial sales expert explains the functioning of a mutual fund to a potential client. We have used a 2 by 2 experiment design varying the degree of interaction (with our without customer involvement) and the medium (paper versus computer) used in the meeting. The results show that the use of customer involvement elements, that is to say joint drawing, has a significant positive effect on perceived client orientation and loyalty towards the salesperson, but not on the salesperson's (perceived) expertise and trust. It also has a positive effect on perceived empathy of the sales advisor. We also found that the use of paper sketching leads to significant increased loyalty towards the salesperson when it comes to questions as \\\"would you recommend this consultant?\\\" Computer presentations in lieu of paper sketching do not lead to significant differences in terms of the salesperson's impact on a prospect -- except if the subject has a preference for affective information processing; in this case sketching outperforms visualization software. This article has relevance for visualization scholars and practitioners, as it provides evidence that the visualization medium and its involvement level affect communication effectiveness depending on the cognitive style of the participants.\",\"PeriodicalId\":264951,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2012 16th International Conference on Information Visualisation\",\"volume\":\"143 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2012 16th International Conference on Information Visualisation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IV.2012.64\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 16th International Conference on Information Visualisation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IV.2012.64","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在本文中,我们报告了模拟潜在客户和银行顾问之间的金融销售会议的实验结果。这项研究涉及112名受试者,并考察了互动视觉销售沟通对销售质量的影响。我们模拟了信息丰富的销售会议,金融销售专家向潜在客户解释共同基金的运作。我们使用了2对2的实验设计,改变了会议中交互的程度(没有客户参与)和媒介(纸张还是计算机)。结果表明,使用客户参与要素,即联合绘图,对感知的客户导向和对销售人员的忠诚有显著的正向影响,但对销售人员的(感知)专业知识和信任没有显著的正向影响。对销售顾问的共情感也有正向影响。我们还发现,当遇到“你会推荐这位顾问吗?”这样的问题时,使用纸上草图会显著提高销售人员的忠诚度。在销售人员对潜在客户的影响方面,电脑演示代替纸上草图并不会产生显著差异——除非销售人员偏爱情感信息处理;在这种情况下,草图优于可视化软件。本文对可视化学者和实践者具有重要意义,因为它提供了可视化媒介及其参与程度影响沟通有效性的证据,这取决于参与者的认知风格。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does the Medium Matter? An Experiment on the Impact of Collaboration on Visual Sales Sessions
In this paper we report on the results of an experiment simulating financial sales meetings between prospective customers and a banking advisor. The study involves 112 subjects and examines effects of interactive visual sales communication on the quality of a sales encounter. We have simulated informative sales meetings where a financial sales expert explains the functioning of a mutual fund to a potential client. We have used a 2 by 2 experiment design varying the degree of interaction (with our without customer involvement) and the medium (paper versus computer) used in the meeting. The results show that the use of customer involvement elements, that is to say joint drawing, has a significant positive effect on perceived client orientation and loyalty towards the salesperson, but not on the salesperson's (perceived) expertise and trust. It also has a positive effect on perceived empathy of the sales advisor. We also found that the use of paper sketching leads to significant increased loyalty towards the salesperson when it comes to questions as "would you recommend this consultant?" Computer presentations in lieu of paper sketching do not lead to significant differences in terms of the salesperson's impact on a prospect -- except if the subject has a preference for affective information processing; in this case sketching outperforms visualization software. This article has relevance for visualization scholars and practitioners, as it provides evidence that the visualization medium and its involvement level affect communication effectiveness depending on the cognitive style of the participants.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信