{"title":"运动补偿视频中残余压缩方法的比较","authors":"Weekiong Poh, D. Monro","doi":"10.1109/MMSP.2002.1203260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we compare the objective performance of several algorithms for coding motion compensated residuals, including the wavelet transform, matching pursuits and an improved embedded DCT-based coding method. A motion-compensated prediction-based approach with overlapped block matching compensation (OBMC) is used in all systems in the evaluation. The results show that matching pursuits outperforms transform-based methods by 0.1-1.0 dB in PSNR. The embedded DCT coder usually outperforms the wavelet-based SPIHT-AC in the examples considered, and SPIHT is usually better than JPEG 2000.","PeriodicalId":398813,"journal":{"name":"2002 IEEE Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing.","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of residual compression methods in motion compensated video\",\"authors\":\"Weekiong Poh, D. Monro\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MMSP.2002.1203260\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we compare the objective performance of several algorithms for coding motion compensated residuals, including the wavelet transform, matching pursuits and an improved embedded DCT-based coding method. A motion-compensated prediction-based approach with overlapped block matching compensation (OBMC) is used in all systems in the evaluation. The results show that matching pursuits outperforms transform-based methods by 0.1-1.0 dB in PSNR. The embedded DCT coder usually outperforms the wavelet-based SPIHT-AC in the examples considered, and SPIHT is usually better than JPEG 2000.\",\"PeriodicalId\":398813,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2002 IEEE Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing.\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2002 IEEE Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/MMSP.2002.1203260\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2002 IEEE Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MMSP.2002.1203260","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of residual compression methods in motion compensated video
In this paper, we compare the objective performance of several algorithms for coding motion compensated residuals, including the wavelet transform, matching pursuits and an improved embedded DCT-based coding method. A motion-compensated prediction-based approach with overlapped block matching compensation (OBMC) is used in all systems in the evaluation. The results show that matching pursuits outperforms transform-based methods by 0.1-1.0 dB in PSNR. The embedded DCT coder usually outperforms the wavelet-based SPIHT-AC in the examples considered, and SPIHT is usually better than JPEG 2000.