运动补偿视频中残余压缩方法的比较

Weekiong Poh, D. Monro
{"title":"运动补偿视频中残余压缩方法的比较","authors":"Weekiong Poh, D. Monro","doi":"10.1109/MMSP.2002.1203260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we compare the objective performance of several algorithms for coding motion compensated residuals, including the wavelet transform, matching pursuits and an improved embedded DCT-based coding method. A motion-compensated prediction-based approach with overlapped block matching compensation (OBMC) is used in all systems in the evaluation. The results show that matching pursuits outperforms transform-based methods by 0.1-1.0 dB in PSNR. The embedded DCT coder usually outperforms the wavelet-based SPIHT-AC in the examples considered, and SPIHT is usually better than JPEG 2000.","PeriodicalId":398813,"journal":{"name":"2002 IEEE Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing.","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of residual compression methods in motion compensated video\",\"authors\":\"Weekiong Poh, D. Monro\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MMSP.2002.1203260\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we compare the objective performance of several algorithms for coding motion compensated residuals, including the wavelet transform, matching pursuits and an improved embedded DCT-based coding method. A motion-compensated prediction-based approach with overlapped block matching compensation (OBMC) is used in all systems in the evaluation. The results show that matching pursuits outperforms transform-based methods by 0.1-1.0 dB in PSNR. The embedded DCT coder usually outperforms the wavelet-based SPIHT-AC in the examples considered, and SPIHT is usually better than JPEG 2000.\",\"PeriodicalId\":398813,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2002 IEEE Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing.\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2002 IEEE Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/MMSP.2002.1203260\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2002 IEEE Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MMSP.2002.1203260","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

在本文中,我们比较了几种运动补偿残差编码算法的客观性能,包括小波变换、匹配追踪和改进的嵌入式dct编码方法。在评估中,所有系统都采用了基于运动补偿预测的重叠块匹配补偿(OBMC)方法。结果表明,匹配追踪比基于变换的方法的PSNR提高了0.1 ~ 1.0 dB。在考虑的示例中,嵌入式DCT编码器通常优于基于小波的SPIHT- ac,并且SPIHT通常优于JPEG 2000。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of residual compression methods in motion compensated video
In this paper, we compare the objective performance of several algorithms for coding motion compensated residuals, including the wavelet transform, matching pursuits and an improved embedded DCT-based coding method. A motion-compensated prediction-based approach with overlapped block matching compensation (OBMC) is used in all systems in the evaluation. The results show that matching pursuits outperforms transform-based methods by 0.1-1.0 dB in PSNR. The embedded DCT coder usually outperforms the wavelet-based SPIHT-AC in the examples considered, and SPIHT is usually better than JPEG 2000.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信