诚实的假设检验:一个寓言

M. Stutzer
{"title":"诚实的假设检验:一个寓言","authors":"M. Stutzer","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2779214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Typical empirical methods training for finance Ph.D students emphasizes theory and application of statistical tools, augmented by study of empirical applications published in the academic journals. But newly minted faculty/authors will also have to cope with opinions of their administrative and academic journal evaluators, something not as heavily stressed in the heavily methods-oriented curriculum. We put a humorous slant on this by providing a parable in which a seemingly simple, standard hypothesis test is subject to the crucible of peer opinion both within and outside the professor's domicile. The parable is used to teach that the interpretation of seemingly simple test statistics is not so simple, and is intended to help instructors augment traditional statistics pedagogy.","PeriodicalId":373500,"journal":{"name":"EduRN: Financial Economics Education (FEN) (Topic)","volume":"1944 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Honest Hypothesis Testing: A Parable\",\"authors\":\"M. Stutzer\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2779214\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Typical empirical methods training for finance Ph.D students emphasizes theory and application of statistical tools, augmented by study of empirical applications published in the academic journals. But newly minted faculty/authors will also have to cope with opinions of their administrative and academic journal evaluators, something not as heavily stressed in the heavily methods-oriented curriculum. We put a humorous slant on this by providing a parable in which a seemingly simple, standard hypothesis test is subject to the crucible of peer opinion both within and outside the professor's domicile. The parable is used to teach that the interpretation of seemingly simple test statistics is not so simple, and is intended to help instructors augment traditional statistics pedagogy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":373500,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EduRN: Financial Economics Education (FEN) (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"1944 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EduRN: Financial Economics Education (FEN) (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2779214\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EduRN: Financial Economics Education (FEN) (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2779214","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

典型的实证方法金融学博士生培训强调统计工具的理论和应用,并辅以学术期刊上发表的实证应用研究。但是,新上任的教师/作者还必须应对行政和学术期刊评估人员的意见,这在以方法为导向的课程中并没有那么重要。我们幽默地讲了一个寓言,在这个寓言中,一个看似简单、标准的假设检验受到了教授住所内外同行意见的考验。这个寓言是用来告诉人们,对看似简单的测试统计的解释并不那么简单,旨在帮助教师增强传统的统计教学法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Honest Hypothesis Testing: A Parable
Typical empirical methods training for finance Ph.D students emphasizes theory and application of statistical tools, augmented by study of empirical applications published in the academic journals. But newly minted faculty/authors will also have to cope with opinions of their administrative and academic journal evaluators, something not as heavily stressed in the heavily methods-oriented curriculum. We put a humorous slant on this by providing a parable in which a seemingly simple, standard hypothesis test is subject to the crucible of peer opinion both within and outside the professor's domicile. The parable is used to teach that the interpretation of seemingly simple test statistics is not so simple, and is intended to help instructors augment traditional statistics pedagogy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信