{"title":"100个临床伦理咨询案例中的“五大","authors":"S. Reiter-Theil, J. Schürmann","doi":"10.24894/bf.2016.09013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract \nBackground: \n The study aims at shedding light into the practice of \nClinical Ethics Consultation (EC) thereby making a contribution to bet \n- \nter understanding its triggers, contents and outcomes. It was carried out \nin 2 (out of 3) local University Hospitals. \nMaterial and method: \n 100 full ECs (50 ECs conducted at the somatic/ \nUSB, 50 at the Psychiatric University Hospital/UPK) over 3 years were \nanalysed on the basis of its rich and highly standardised documentation. \nResults: \n Overall, the majority of all ECs (84%) feature ethical issues \nreferring to at least one of the following 5 topics: coercion (28%), care \nmanagement (24%), treatment-plan evaluation (17%), end-of-life care \n(16%), or pregnancy / assisted reproduction (12%). \nIn USB ECs, the top 3 main ethical issues concern end-of-life care (28%), \npregnancy / assisted reproduction (22%), and coercion (20%), followed \nby treatment limitation (8%), and care management (6%). The single \nmost significant main ethical issue in UPK ECs is coercion (34%), fol \n- \nlowed by care management and treatment-plan evaluation (both 20%). \nDiscussion: \n The prevalence of end-of-life issues in somatic health care \nis in line with previous research, while the evidence for coercion as a \nmajor topic in ECs in general is new. Comparable studies are hardly \navailable from other European centres, and the existing North American \npapers do not display a prevalence of this concern. \nConclusions: \n The thematic shift to a double focus on end-of-life deci \n- \nsions \nand \n coercion and the “big five” themes revealed altogether stim- \nulate the catalogue of clinical ethics education, both for ethics consul \n- \ntants and health care professions.","PeriodicalId":263926,"journal":{"name":"Bioethica Forum","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The “Big Five” in 100 Clinical Ethics Consultation Cases\",\"authors\":\"S. Reiter-Theil, J. Schürmann\",\"doi\":\"10.24894/bf.2016.09013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract \\nBackground: \\n The study aims at shedding light into the practice of \\nClinical Ethics Consultation (EC) thereby making a contribution to bet \\n- \\nter understanding its triggers, contents and outcomes. It was carried out \\nin 2 (out of 3) local University Hospitals. \\nMaterial and method: \\n 100 full ECs (50 ECs conducted at the somatic/ \\nUSB, 50 at the Psychiatric University Hospital/UPK) over 3 years were \\nanalysed on the basis of its rich and highly standardised documentation. \\nResults: \\n Overall, the majority of all ECs (84%) feature ethical issues \\nreferring to at least one of the following 5 topics: coercion (28%), care \\nmanagement (24%), treatment-plan evaluation (17%), end-of-life care \\n(16%), or pregnancy / assisted reproduction (12%). \\nIn USB ECs, the top 3 main ethical issues concern end-of-life care (28%), \\npregnancy / assisted reproduction (22%), and coercion (20%), followed \\nby treatment limitation (8%), and care management (6%). The single \\nmost significant main ethical issue in UPK ECs is coercion (34%), fol \\n- \\nlowed by care management and treatment-plan evaluation (both 20%). \\nDiscussion: \\n The prevalence of end-of-life issues in somatic health care \\nis in line with previous research, while the evidence for coercion as a \\nmajor topic in ECs in general is new. Comparable studies are hardly \\navailable from other European centres, and the existing North American \\npapers do not display a prevalence of this concern. \\nConclusions: \\n The thematic shift to a double focus on end-of-life deci \\n- \\nsions \\nand \\n coercion and the “big five” themes revealed altogether stim- \\nulate the catalogue of clinical ethics education, both for ethics consul \\n- \\ntants and health care professions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":263926,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bioethica Forum\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bioethica Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24894/bf.2016.09013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioethica Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24894/bf.2016.09013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The “Big Five” in 100 Clinical Ethics Consultation Cases
Abstract
Background:
The study aims at shedding light into the practice of
Clinical Ethics Consultation (EC) thereby making a contribution to bet
-
ter understanding its triggers, contents and outcomes. It was carried out
in 2 (out of 3) local University Hospitals.
Material and method:
100 full ECs (50 ECs conducted at the somatic/
USB, 50 at the Psychiatric University Hospital/UPK) over 3 years were
analysed on the basis of its rich and highly standardised documentation.
Results:
Overall, the majority of all ECs (84%) feature ethical issues
referring to at least one of the following 5 topics: coercion (28%), care
management (24%), treatment-plan evaluation (17%), end-of-life care
(16%), or pregnancy / assisted reproduction (12%).
In USB ECs, the top 3 main ethical issues concern end-of-life care (28%),
pregnancy / assisted reproduction (22%), and coercion (20%), followed
by treatment limitation (8%), and care management (6%). The single
most significant main ethical issue in UPK ECs is coercion (34%), fol
-
lowed by care management and treatment-plan evaluation (both 20%).
Discussion:
The prevalence of end-of-life issues in somatic health care
is in line with previous research, while the evidence for coercion as a
major topic in ECs in general is new. Comparable studies are hardly
available from other European centres, and the existing North American
papers do not display a prevalence of this concern.
Conclusions:
The thematic shift to a double focus on end-of-life deci
-
sions
and
coercion and the “big five” themes revealed altogether stim-
ulate the catalogue of clinical ethics education, both for ethics consul
-
tants and health care professions.