100个临床伦理咨询案例中的“五大

S. Reiter-Theil, J. Schürmann
{"title":"100个临床伦理咨询案例中的“五大","authors":"S. Reiter-Theil, J. Schürmann","doi":"10.24894/bf.2016.09013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract \nBackground: \n The study aims at shedding light into the practice of \nClinical Ethics Consultation (EC) thereby making a contribution to bet \n- \nter understanding its triggers, contents and outcomes. It was carried out \nin 2 (out of 3) local University Hospitals. \nMaterial and method: \n 100 full ECs (50 ECs conducted at the somatic/ \nUSB, 50 at the Psychiatric University Hospital/UPK) over 3 years were \nanalysed on the basis of its rich and highly standardised documentation. \nResults: \n Overall, the majority of all ECs (84%) feature ethical issues \nreferring to at least one of the following 5 topics: coercion (28%), care \nmanagement (24%), treatment-plan evaluation (17%), end-of-life care \n(16%), or pregnancy / assisted reproduction (12%). \nIn USB ECs, the top 3 main ethical issues concern end-of-life care (28%), \npregnancy / assisted reproduction (22%), and coercion (20%), followed \nby treatment limitation (8%), and care management (6%). The single \nmost significant main ethical issue in UPK ECs is coercion (34%), fol \n- \nlowed by care management and treatment-plan evaluation (both 20%). \nDiscussion: \n The prevalence of end-of-life issues in somatic health care \nis in line with previous research, while the evidence for coercion as a \nmajor topic in ECs in general is new. Comparable studies are hardly \navailable from other European centres, and the existing North American \npapers do not display a prevalence of this concern. \nConclusions: \n The thematic shift to a double focus on end-of-life deci \n- \nsions \nand \n coercion and the “big five” themes revealed altogether stim- \nulate the catalogue of clinical ethics education, both for ethics consul \n- \ntants and health care professions.","PeriodicalId":263926,"journal":{"name":"Bioethica Forum","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The “Big Five” in 100 Clinical Ethics Consultation Cases\",\"authors\":\"S. Reiter-Theil, J. Schürmann\",\"doi\":\"10.24894/bf.2016.09013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract \\nBackground: \\n The study aims at shedding light into the practice of \\nClinical Ethics Consultation (EC) thereby making a contribution to bet \\n- \\nter understanding its triggers, contents and outcomes. It was carried out \\nin 2 (out of 3) local University Hospitals. \\nMaterial and method: \\n 100 full ECs (50 ECs conducted at the somatic/ \\nUSB, 50 at the Psychiatric University Hospital/UPK) over 3 years were \\nanalysed on the basis of its rich and highly standardised documentation. \\nResults: \\n Overall, the majority of all ECs (84%) feature ethical issues \\nreferring to at least one of the following 5 topics: coercion (28%), care \\nmanagement (24%), treatment-plan evaluation (17%), end-of-life care \\n(16%), or pregnancy / assisted reproduction (12%). \\nIn USB ECs, the top 3 main ethical issues concern end-of-life care (28%), \\npregnancy / assisted reproduction (22%), and coercion (20%), followed \\nby treatment limitation (8%), and care management (6%). The single \\nmost significant main ethical issue in UPK ECs is coercion (34%), fol \\n- \\nlowed by care management and treatment-plan evaluation (both 20%). \\nDiscussion: \\n The prevalence of end-of-life issues in somatic health care \\nis in line with previous research, while the evidence for coercion as a \\nmajor topic in ECs in general is new. Comparable studies are hardly \\navailable from other European centres, and the existing North American \\npapers do not display a prevalence of this concern. \\nConclusions: \\n The thematic shift to a double focus on end-of-life deci \\n- \\nsions \\nand \\n coercion and the “big five” themes revealed altogether stim- \\nulate the catalogue of clinical ethics education, both for ethics consul \\n- \\ntants and health care professions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":263926,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bioethica Forum\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bioethica Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24894/bf.2016.09013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioethica Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24894/bf.2016.09013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

摘要

摘要背景:本研究旨在揭示临床伦理咨询(EC)的实践,从而有助于更好地理解其触发因素、内容和结果。在3所地方大学医院中的2所进行了检查。材料和方法:根据其丰富和高度标准化的文件,分析了3年来100例完整的ECs(50例在躯体/ USB进行,50例在精神病学大学医院/UPK进行)。结果:总体而言,大多数ec(84%)的伦理问题涉及以下5个主题中的至少一个:强迫(28%),护理管理(24%),治疗计划评估(17%),临终关怀(16%)或怀孕/辅助生殖(12%)。在USB ec中,前三大主要伦理问题涉及临终关怀(28%)、怀孕/辅助生殖(22%)和强迫(20%),其次是治疗限制(8%)和护理管理(6%)。UPK ec中最重要的主要伦理问题是强迫(34%),其次是护理管理和治疗计划评估(均为20%)。讨论:躯体保健中临终问题的普遍存在与先前的研究一致,而强迫作为ec中一般主要主题的证据是新的。其他欧洲研究中心几乎没有可比的研究,现有的北美论文也没有显示出这种担忧的普遍性。结论:主题转移到双重关注临终决定和强迫和“五大”主题揭示了共同刺激目录临床伦理教育,无论是伦理顾问和卫生保健专业。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The “Big Five” in 100 Clinical Ethics Consultation Cases
Abstract Background: The study aims at shedding light into the practice of Clinical Ethics Consultation (EC) thereby making a contribution to bet - ter understanding its triggers, contents and outcomes. It was carried out in 2 (out of 3) local University Hospitals. Material and method: 100 full ECs (50 ECs conducted at the somatic/ USB, 50 at the Psychiatric University Hospital/UPK) over 3 years were analysed on the basis of its rich and highly standardised documentation. Results: Overall, the majority of all ECs (84%) feature ethical issues referring to at least one of the following 5 topics: coercion (28%), care management (24%), treatment-plan evaluation (17%), end-of-life care (16%), or pregnancy / assisted reproduction (12%). In USB ECs, the top 3 main ethical issues concern end-of-life care (28%), pregnancy / assisted reproduction (22%), and coercion (20%), followed by treatment limitation (8%), and care management (6%). The single most significant main ethical issue in UPK ECs is coercion (34%), fol - lowed by care management and treatment-plan evaluation (both 20%). Discussion: The prevalence of end-of-life issues in somatic health care is in line with previous research, while the evidence for coercion as a major topic in ECs in general is new. Comparable studies are hardly available from other European centres, and the existing North American papers do not display a prevalence of this concern. Conclusions: The thematic shift to a double focus on end-of-life deci - sions and coercion and the “big five” themes revealed altogether stim- ulate the catalogue of clinical ethics education, both for ethics consul - tants and health care professions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信