面额重要吗?天主教徒和圣公会教徒在宗教信仰和价值体系上的差异

Studia Oecumenica Pub Date : 2021-12-02 DOI:10.25167/so.3855
Dariusz Krok, M. Cholewa
{"title":"面额重要吗?天主教徒和圣公会教徒在宗教信仰和价值体系上的差异","authors":"Dariusz Krok, M. Cholewa","doi":"10.25167/so.3855","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this empirical article is to investigate differences between two Christian denominations: Catholics and Anglicans in terms of religiosity and values. Religiosity was measured within dimensions of centrality of religiosity and religious coping, while the value system contained hedonic, vital, aesthetic, truth, moral, and sacred values. In addition, potential associations between the dimensions of religiosity and values were assessed. One hundred and fifty one participants (75 Catholics and 76 Anglicans) completed three questionnaires: the Centrality of Religiosity Scale, the Brief RCOPE Scale, and the Scheler Values Scale. The results demonstrated that Catholics were characterised by higher levels of religious dimensions representing communal worship related to the sacraments, while Anglicans more strongly favoured religious dimensions reflecting an individual approach to religiosity. Catholics also obtained higher levels of hedonic and vital values than Anglicans. In addition, there were significant associations between most dimensions of religiosity and sacred values. Taken together, the findings emphasise the need for a combined study of religiosity and values which appears central to the formation of people’s religious beliefs and behaviour.","PeriodicalId":269382,"journal":{"name":"Studia Oecumenica","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does a denomination matter? Differences in religiosity and value systems between Catholics and Anglicans\",\"authors\":\"Dariusz Krok, M. Cholewa\",\"doi\":\"10.25167/so.3855\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this empirical article is to investigate differences between two Christian denominations: Catholics and Anglicans in terms of religiosity and values. Religiosity was measured within dimensions of centrality of religiosity and religious coping, while the value system contained hedonic, vital, aesthetic, truth, moral, and sacred values. In addition, potential associations between the dimensions of religiosity and values were assessed. One hundred and fifty one participants (75 Catholics and 76 Anglicans) completed three questionnaires: the Centrality of Religiosity Scale, the Brief RCOPE Scale, and the Scheler Values Scale. The results demonstrated that Catholics were characterised by higher levels of religious dimensions representing communal worship related to the sacraments, while Anglicans more strongly favoured religious dimensions reflecting an individual approach to religiosity. Catholics also obtained higher levels of hedonic and vital values than Anglicans. In addition, there were significant associations between most dimensions of religiosity and sacred values. Taken together, the findings emphasise the need for a combined study of religiosity and values which appears central to the formation of people’s religious beliefs and behaviour.\",\"PeriodicalId\":269382,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studia Oecumenica\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studia Oecumenica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25167/so.3855\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Oecumenica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25167/so.3855","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

这篇实证文章的目的是调查两个基督教教派之间的差异:天主教徒和英国国教在宗教信仰和价值观方面。宗教虔诚度是在宗教虔诚度和宗教应对的中心性维度内衡量的,而价值体系则包含享乐、生命、审美、真理、道德和神圣的价值观。此外,还评估了宗教虔诚度和价值观之间的潜在联系。151名参与者(75名天主教徒和76名圣公会教徒)完成了三份调查问卷:宗教虔诚度中心性量表、简短RCOPE量表和谢勒价值观量表。结果表明,天主教徒的特点是具有较高水平的宗教维度,代表与圣礼有关的集体崇拜,而圣公会教徒则更强烈地倾向于反映个人对宗教虔诚的宗教维度。天主教徒也比英国国教教徒获得了更高层次的享乐和生命价值。此外,在宗教虔诚和神圣价值的大多数维度之间存在着显著的联系。综上所述,这些发现强调了对宗教信仰和价值观进行综合研究的必要性,这似乎是人们宗教信仰和行为形成的核心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does a denomination matter? Differences in religiosity and value systems between Catholics and Anglicans
The purpose of this empirical article is to investigate differences between two Christian denominations: Catholics and Anglicans in terms of religiosity and values. Religiosity was measured within dimensions of centrality of religiosity and religious coping, while the value system contained hedonic, vital, aesthetic, truth, moral, and sacred values. In addition, potential associations between the dimensions of religiosity and values were assessed. One hundred and fifty one participants (75 Catholics and 76 Anglicans) completed three questionnaires: the Centrality of Religiosity Scale, the Brief RCOPE Scale, and the Scheler Values Scale. The results demonstrated that Catholics were characterised by higher levels of religious dimensions representing communal worship related to the sacraments, while Anglicans more strongly favoured religious dimensions reflecting an individual approach to religiosity. Catholics also obtained higher levels of hedonic and vital values than Anglicans. In addition, there were significant associations between most dimensions of religiosity and sacred values. Taken together, the findings emphasise the need for a combined study of religiosity and values which appears central to the formation of people’s religious beliefs and behaviour.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信