导航由自动化测试引起的信息过载——多分支开发中的集群方法

Nicklas Erman, Vanja Tufvesson, Markus Borg, P. Runeson, A. Ardö
{"title":"导航由自动化测试引起的信息过载——多分支开发中的集群方法","authors":"Nicklas Erman, Vanja Tufvesson, Markus Borg, P. Runeson, A. Ardö","doi":"10.1109/ICST.2015.7102596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Test automation is a widely used technique to increase the efficiency of software testing. However, executing more test cases increases the effort required to analyze test results. At Qlik, automated tests run nightly for up to 20 development branches, each containing thousands of test cases, resulting in information overload. Aim. We therefore develop a tool that supports the analysis of test results. Method. We create NIOCAT, a tool that clusters similar test case failures, to help the analyst identify underlying causes. To evaluate the tool, experiments on manually created subsets of failed test cases representing different use cases are conducted, and a focus group meeting is held with test analysts at Qlik. Results. The case study shows that NIOCAT creates accurate clusters, in line with analyses performed by human analysts. Further, the potential time-savings of our approach is confirmed by the participants in the focus group. Conclusions. NIOCAT provides a feasible complement to current automated testing practices at Qlik by reducing information overload.","PeriodicalId":401414,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE 8th International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation (ICST)","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Navigating Information Overload Caused by Automated Testing - a Clustering Approach in Multi-Branch Development\",\"authors\":\"Nicklas Erman, Vanja Tufvesson, Markus Borg, P. Runeson, A. Ardö\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICST.2015.7102596\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background. Test automation is a widely used technique to increase the efficiency of software testing. However, executing more test cases increases the effort required to analyze test results. At Qlik, automated tests run nightly for up to 20 development branches, each containing thousands of test cases, resulting in information overload. Aim. We therefore develop a tool that supports the analysis of test results. Method. We create NIOCAT, a tool that clusters similar test case failures, to help the analyst identify underlying causes. To evaluate the tool, experiments on manually created subsets of failed test cases representing different use cases are conducted, and a focus group meeting is held with test analysts at Qlik. Results. The case study shows that NIOCAT creates accurate clusters, in line with analyses performed by human analysts. Further, the potential time-savings of our approach is confirmed by the participants in the focus group. Conclusions. NIOCAT provides a feasible complement to current automated testing practices at Qlik by reducing information overload.\",\"PeriodicalId\":401414,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 IEEE 8th International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation (ICST)\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-04-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 IEEE 8th International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation (ICST)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICST.2015.7102596\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE 8th International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation (ICST)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICST.2015.7102596","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

背景。测试自动化是一种广泛使用的提高软件测试效率的技术。然而,执行更多的测试用例会增加分析测试结果所需的工作量。在Qlik,自动化测试每晚运行多达20个开发分支,每个分支包含数千个测试用例,导致信息过载。的目标。因此,我们开发了一种支持测试结果分析的工具。方法。我们创建NIOCAT,一个将类似的测试用例失败聚类的工具,以帮助分析人员识别潜在的原因。为了评估这个工具,在手工创建的失败测试用例子集上进行实验,这些测试用例代表了不同的用例,并且在Qlik与测试分析师举行了焦点小组会议。结果。案例研究表明,NIOCAT创建了准确的聚类,与人类分析师执行的分析一致。此外,焦点小组的参与者确认了我们的方法可能节省的时间。结论。NIOCAT通过减少信息过载,为Qlik当前的自动化测试实践提供了一个可行的补充。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Navigating Information Overload Caused by Automated Testing - a Clustering Approach in Multi-Branch Development
Background. Test automation is a widely used technique to increase the efficiency of software testing. However, executing more test cases increases the effort required to analyze test results. At Qlik, automated tests run nightly for up to 20 development branches, each containing thousands of test cases, resulting in information overload. Aim. We therefore develop a tool that supports the analysis of test results. Method. We create NIOCAT, a tool that clusters similar test case failures, to help the analyst identify underlying causes. To evaluate the tool, experiments on manually created subsets of failed test cases representing different use cases are conducted, and a focus group meeting is held with test analysts at Qlik. Results. The case study shows that NIOCAT creates accurate clusters, in line with analyses performed by human analysts. Further, the potential time-savings of our approach is confirmed by the participants in the focus group. Conclusions. NIOCAT provides a feasible complement to current automated testing practices at Qlik by reducing information overload.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信