夜间架空标志可见度指南

NCHRP Report Pub Date : 2016-06-17 DOI:10.17226/23512
P. Carlson, Bradford K. Brimley, J. Miles, S. Chrysler, R. Gibbons, T. Terry
{"title":"夜间架空标志可见度指南","authors":"P. Carlson, Bradford K. Brimley, J. Miles, S. Chrysler, R. Gibbons, T. Terry","doi":"10.17226/23512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This report presents proposed guidelines for nighttime overhead sign visibility, formatted as a potential replacement for the current Chapter 10, Roadway Sign Lighting, in the 2005 AASHTO Roadway Lighting Design Guide. The research for the project was conducted in two phases. In the first phase, a closed-course study was conducted at the Virginia Smart Road at the Virginia Tech Transportation Institute. The goal of this study was to determine legibility distances for drivers in controlled conditions for three different sign legend and background configurations lit by either high pressure sodium or light emitting diode systems or they were unlit. In the second phase, an open-road study was conducted by the Texas AM San Antonio, Texas; and Orlando, Florida. The goal of the open-road study was to determine the effects of sign luminance and visual complexity on the distance at which a driver can read overhead signs and street signs. Both studies employed cohorts of recruited drivers evenly split in terms of gender and age. The closed-course study found that sign lighting does not significantly impact legibility distance of signs in rural and dark areas, suggesting that sufficient illumination for visibility was provided by headlamps. Using software developed for the open-road study, digital images were analyzed to quantitatively measure visual complexity in urban and suburban areas. Visual complexity of sign surroundings was found to reduce the distance at which a driver can correctly recognize information from signs, however, this effect can be countered by increases in the legend luminance. This report fully documents the research and includes four appendixes: Incremental Effects of Light Sources and Sign Sheeting on Legend Luminance for Overhead Guide Signs; Assessment of Background Complexity Using Digital Images of Roadway Scenes by Image Processing; Open-Road Study Details; and Guidelines for Nighttime Overhead Sign Visibility.","PeriodicalId":350472,"journal":{"name":"NCHRP Report","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Guidelines for Nighttime Visibility of Overhead Signs\",\"authors\":\"P. Carlson, Bradford K. Brimley, J. Miles, S. Chrysler, R. Gibbons, T. Terry\",\"doi\":\"10.17226/23512\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This report presents proposed guidelines for nighttime overhead sign visibility, formatted as a potential replacement for the current Chapter 10, Roadway Sign Lighting, in the 2005 AASHTO Roadway Lighting Design Guide. The research for the project was conducted in two phases. In the first phase, a closed-course study was conducted at the Virginia Smart Road at the Virginia Tech Transportation Institute. The goal of this study was to determine legibility distances for drivers in controlled conditions for three different sign legend and background configurations lit by either high pressure sodium or light emitting diode systems or they were unlit. In the second phase, an open-road study was conducted by the Texas AM San Antonio, Texas; and Orlando, Florida. The goal of the open-road study was to determine the effects of sign luminance and visual complexity on the distance at which a driver can read overhead signs and street signs. Both studies employed cohorts of recruited drivers evenly split in terms of gender and age. The closed-course study found that sign lighting does not significantly impact legibility distance of signs in rural and dark areas, suggesting that sufficient illumination for visibility was provided by headlamps. Using software developed for the open-road study, digital images were analyzed to quantitatively measure visual complexity in urban and suburban areas. Visual complexity of sign surroundings was found to reduce the distance at which a driver can correctly recognize information from signs, however, this effect can be countered by increases in the legend luminance. This report fully documents the research and includes four appendixes: Incremental Effects of Light Sources and Sign Sheeting on Legend Luminance for Overhead Guide Signs; Assessment of Background Complexity Using Digital Images of Roadway Scenes by Image Processing; Open-Road Study Details; and Guidelines for Nighttime Overhead Sign Visibility.\",\"PeriodicalId\":350472,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NCHRP Report\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NCHRP Report\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17226/23512\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NCHRP Report","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17226/23512","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本报告提出了夜间架空标志可见性的建议指导方针,格式为2005年AASHTO道路照明设计指南中当前第10章“道路标志照明”的潜在替代。该项目的研究分两个阶段进行。在第一阶段,在弗吉尼亚理工大学交通研究所的弗吉尼亚智能道路进行了一项封闭式课程研究。本研究的目的是确定驾驶员在受控条件下对三种不同的标志图案和背景配置的易读距离,这些标志由高压钠或发光二极管系统照明,或者不照明。在第二阶段,一项开放道路研究由德克萨斯州圣安东尼奥市的德克萨斯航空公司进行;以及佛罗里达州的奥兰多。开放道路研究的目的是确定标志亮度和视觉复杂性对驾驶员可以阅读头顶标志和街道标志的距离的影响。这两项研究都招募了一批按性别和年龄平均分配的司机。封闭过程研究发现,在农村和黑暗地区,标志照明对标志的易读距离没有显著影响,这表明前照灯为能见度提供了足够的照明。利用为开放道路研究开发的软件,对城市和郊区的数字图像进行分析,定量测量视觉复杂性。研究发现,标志周围的视觉复杂性会减少驾驶员正确识别标志信息的距离,然而,这种影响可以通过增加标志亮度来抵消。本报告完整地记录了研究结果,并包括四个附录:光源和标识页对架空导视标志图例亮度的增量效应;基于图像处理的道路场景数字图像背景复杂性评估开放道路研究详情;以及夜间头顶标志可见度指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Guidelines for Nighttime Visibility of Overhead Signs
This report presents proposed guidelines for nighttime overhead sign visibility, formatted as a potential replacement for the current Chapter 10, Roadway Sign Lighting, in the 2005 AASHTO Roadway Lighting Design Guide. The research for the project was conducted in two phases. In the first phase, a closed-course study was conducted at the Virginia Smart Road at the Virginia Tech Transportation Institute. The goal of this study was to determine legibility distances for drivers in controlled conditions for three different sign legend and background configurations lit by either high pressure sodium or light emitting diode systems or they were unlit. In the second phase, an open-road study was conducted by the Texas AM San Antonio, Texas; and Orlando, Florida. The goal of the open-road study was to determine the effects of sign luminance and visual complexity on the distance at which a driver can read overhead signs and street signs. Both studies employed cohorts of recruited drivers evenly split in terms of gender and age. The closed-course study found that sign lighting does not significantly impact legibility distance of signs in rural and dark areas, suggesting that sufficient illumination for visibility was provided by headlamps. Using software developed for the open-road study, digital images were analyzed to quantitatively measure visual complexity in urban and suburban areas. Visual complexity of sign surroundings was found to reduce the distance at which a driver can correctly recognize information from signs, however, this effect can be countered by increases in the legend luminance. This report fully documents the research and includes four appendixes: Incremental Effects of Light Sources and Sign Sheeting on Legend Luminance for Overhead Guide Signs; Assessment of Background Complexity Using Digital Images of Roadway Scenes by Image Processing; Open-Road Study Details; and Guidelines for Nighttime Overhead Sign Visibility.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信