良性声带病变患者的预后分析

Arpit Sharma, J. Dabholkar, Nitish Virmani
{"title":"良性声带病变患者的预后分析","authors":"Arpit Sharma, J. Dabholkar, Nitish Virmani","doi":"10.5005/JP-JOURNALS-10023-1111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Benign vocal cord lesions cause significant dysphonia by disrupting the normal vibratory function of the vocal fold mucosa. Multidimensional assessment of voice characteristics allows for an accurate analysis of voice impairment and can be used to assess the outcome of different treatment modalities. Aims: To evaluate the outcome in patients treated for benign vocal fold lesions using multidimensional voice assessment. Materials and methods: Thirty adult patients with benign vocal fold lesions were treated according to standard protocols and followed up for 6 months. Voice was evaluated by visual analog scale (VAS), GRBAS (grade, roughness, breathiness, asthenia, strain) scale, maximum phonation time (MPT), S/Z ratio, and acoustic parameters using PRAAT. Preand posttreatment voice was compared. Results: Benign lesions observed were vocal polyps (16), vocal nodules (7), vocal fold cysts (5), vocal cord papilloma (1), and sulcus vocalis (1). Mean VAS rating improved from 7.5 to 2 at 3 months and 1.6 at 6 months. Mean GRBAS score improved from 7.5 to 2.96 at 3 months and 2.3 at 6 months. Maximum phonation time increased from 9.43 seconds to 14.16 seconds at 3 months and 14.46 seconds at 6 months. S/Z ratio reduced from 1.37 to 1.16 at 3 months and 1.15 at 6 months. Jitter reduced from 1.81 to 1% at 3 months and 0.97% at 6 months; shimmer decreased from 6.07 to 2.19% at 3 months and to 2.03% at 6 months. Harmonic-to-noise ratio values improved from 8.01 to 10.78 dB at 3 months and 10.96 dB at 6 months; mean F0 increased from 207.27 to 217.89 Hz at 3 months and 219.65 Hz at 6 months. Conclusion: A single measurement of voice cannot be used as a reliable outcome measure. Perceptual, aerodynamic, acoustic, and self-analysis together allow a multidimensional assessment of voice characteristics.","PeriodicalId":258448,"journal":{"name":"International journal of phonosurgery and laryngology","volume":"163 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcome Analysis in Patients with Benign Vocal Fold Lesions\",\"authors\":\"Arpit Sharma, J. Dabholkar, Nitish Virmani\",\"doi\":\"10.5005/JP-JOURNALS-10023-1111\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Benign vocal cord lesions cause significant dysphonia by disrupting the normal vibratory function of the vocal fold mucosa. Multidimensional assessment of voice characteristics allows for an accurate analysis of voice impairment and can be used to assess the outcome of different treatment modalities. Aims: To evaluate the outcome in patients treated for benign vocal fold lesions using multidimensional voice assessment. Materials and methods: Thirty adult patients with benign vocal fold lesions were treated according to standard protocols and followed up for 6 months. Voice was evaluated by visual analog scale (VAS), GRBAS (grade, roughness, breathiness, asthenia, strain) scale, maximum phonation time (MPT), S/Z ratio, and acoustic parameters using PRAAT. Preand posttreatment voice was compared. Results: Benign lesions observed were vocal polyps (16), vocal nodules (7), vocal fold cysts (5), vocal cord papilloma (1), and sulcus vocalis (1). Mean VAS rating improved from 7.5 to 2 at 3 months and 1.6 at 6 months. Mean GRBAS score improved from 7.5 to 2.96 at 3 months and 2.3 at 6 months. Maximum phonation time increased from 9.43 seconds to 14.16 seconds at 3 months and 14.46 seconds at 6 months. S/Z ratio reduced from 1.37 to 1.16 at 3 months and 1.15 at 6 months. Jitter reduced from 1.81 to 1% at 3 months and 0.97% at 6 months; shimmer decreased from 6.07 to 2.19% at 3 months and to 2.03% at 6 months. Harmonic-to-noise ratio values improved from 8.01 to 10.78 dB at 3 months and 10.96 dB at 6 months; mean F0 increased from 207.27 to 217.89 Hz at 3 months and 219.65 Hz at 6 months. Conclusion: A single measurement of voice cannot be used as a reliable outcome measure. Perceptual, aerodynamic, acoustic, and self-analysis together allow a multidimensional assessment of voice characteristics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":258448,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of phonosurgery and laryngology\",\"volume\":\"163 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of phonosurgery and laryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5005/JP-JOURNALS-10023-1111\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of phonosurgery and laryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/JP-JOURNALS-10023-1111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

声带良性病变通过破坏声带粘膜的正常振动功能而引起明显的发声障碍。声音特征的多维评估允许对声音障碍进行准确的分析,并可用于评估不同治疗方式的结果。目的:应用多维语音评估方法评价良性声带病变患者的预后。材料与方法:对30例成年良性声带病变患者按标准方案进行治疗,随访6个月。采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)、GRBAS(分级、粗糙度、呼吸、乏力、应变)量表、最大发声时间(MPT)、S/Z比和PRAAT声学参数对声音进行评价。比较治疗前后的声音。结果:观察到的良性病变有声带息肉16例,声带小结7例,声带囊肿5例,声带乳头状瘤1例,声带沟1例。VAS评分从3个月时的7.5分提高到2分,6个月时的1.6分。平均GRBAS评分在3个月时从7.5提高到2.96,在6个月时提高到2.3。最大发声时间从3个月时的9.43秒增加到14.16秒,6个月时的14.46秒。S/Z比率在3个月时从1.37降至1.16,在6个月时降至1.15。3个月时抖动从1.81降至1%,6个月时降至0.97%;微光度在3个月时从6.07降至2.19%,6个月时降至2.03%。在3个月和6个月时,信噪比分别从8.01和10.78 dB提高到10.96 dB;3个月时平均F0从207.27 Hz增加到217.89 Hz, 6个月时增加到219.65 Hz。结论:单一的声音测量不能作为可靠的结果测量。感知、空气动力学、声学和自我分析一起允许对声音特征进行多维度评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcome Analysis in Patients with Benign Vocal Fold Lesions
Introduction: Benign vocal cord lesions cause significant dysphonia by disrupting the normal vibratory function of the vocal fold mucosa. Multidimensional assessment of voice characteristics allows for an accurate analysis of voice impairment and can be used to assess the outcome of different treatment modalities. Aims: To evaluate the outcome in patients treated for benign vocal fold lesions using multidimensional voice assessment. Materials and methods: Thirty adult patients with benign vocal fold lesions were treated according to standard protocols and followed up for 6 months. Voice was evaluated by visual analog scale (VAS), GRBAS (grade, roughness, breathiness, asthenia, strain) scale, maximum phonation time (MPT), S/Z ratio, and acoustic parameters using PRAAT. Preand posttreatment voice was compared. Results: Benign lesions observed were vocal polyps (16), vocal nodules (7), vocal fold cysts (5), vocal cord papilloma (1), and sulcus vocalis (1). Mean VAS rating improved from 7.5 to 2 at 3 months and 1.6 at 6 months. Mean GRBAS score improved from 7.5 to 2.96 at 3 months and 2.3 at 6 months. Maximum phonation time increased from 9.43 seconds to 14.16 seconds at 3 months and 14.46 seconds at 6 months. S/Z ratio reduced from 1.37 to 1.16 at 3 months and 1.15 at 6 months. Jitter reduced from 1.81 to 1% at 3 months and 0.97% at 6 months; shimmer decreased from 6.07 to 2.19% at 3 months and to 2.03% at 6 months. Harmonic-to-noise ratio values improved from 8.01 to 10.78 dB at 3 months and 10.96 dB at 6 months; mean F0 increased from 207.27 to 217.89 Hz at 3 months and 219.65 Hz at 6 months. Conclusion: A single measurement of voice cannot be used as a reliable outcome measure. Perceptual, aerodynamic, acoustic, and self-analysis together allow a multidimensional assessment of voice characteristics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信