卡特里娜飓风后的信仰、偏见和政权不确定性

New Institutional Economics Pub Date : 2008-05-15 DOI:10.1108/03068290810886939

Art Carden

{"title":"卡特里娜飓风后的信仰、偏见和政权不确定性","authors":"Art Carden","doi":"10.1108/03068290810886939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay explores the relationship between beliefs and economic policy in the context of gasoline prices after Hurricane Katrina. Evidence of \"anti-market bias\" is identified in polling data, press releases, and legislation, and it is argued that the uncertainty emanating from statutes restricting \"price gouging\" may reduce investment in the provision of \"necessary goods and services\" after natural disasters.","PeriodicalId":383948,"journal":{"name":"New Institutional Economics","volume":"121 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beliefs, Bias, and Regime Uncertainty after Hurricane Katrina\",\"authors\":\"Art Carden\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/03068290810886939\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This essay explores the relationship between beliefs and economic policy in the context of gasoline prices after Hurricane Katrina. Evidence of \\\"anti-market bias\\\" is identified in polling data, press releases, and legislation, and it is argued that the uncertainty emanating from statutes restricting \\\"price gouging\\\" may reduce investment in the provision of \\\"necessary goods and services\\\" after natural disasters.\",\"PeriodicalId\":383948,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Institutional Economics\",\"volume\":\"121 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Institutional Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/03068290810886939\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Institutional Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/03068290810886939","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 9

摘要

本文探讨了卡特里娜飓风后汽油价格背景下信仰与经济政策之间的关系。“反市场偏见”的证据在民意调查数据、新闻发布和立法中得到了确认，并且有人认为，限制“价格欺诈”的法规所产生的不确定性可能会减少在自然灾害后提供“必要商品和服务”的投资。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Beliefs, Bias, and Regime Uncertainty after Hurricane Katrina

This essay explores the relationship between beliefs and economic policy in the context of gasoline prices after Hurricane Katrina. Evidence of "anti-market bias" is identified in polling data, press releases, and legislation, and it is argued that the uncertainty emanating from statutes restricting "price gouging" may reduce investment in the provision of "necessary goods and services" after natural disasters.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

New Institutional Economics

自引率

0.00%

发文量