贸易与不平等:经济正义与发展中国家

F. Garcia
{"title":"贸易与不平等:经济正义与发展中国家","authors":"F. Garcia","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.240611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article develops a Rawlsian framework for the evaluation of the justice of contemporary international trade law. Given the problem of inequality between states, liberal justification of the contemporary international economic system requires wealthier states to pursue redistributive policies through international trade law, as a consequence of an international version of Rawls' second principle of justice. In fact, international trade law recognizes the principle of special and different treatment towards developing states, which under this analysis can be seen as one response to the redistributive imperative. If so, then contemporary special and differential treatment practice in the WTO and in U.S. hemispheric trade policy, and in the contemplated Free Trade Area of the Americas, must be significantly reformed if special and differential treatment is to serve as a policy through which wealthier states can discharge their moral obligations, and the article concludes with recommendations for appropriate changes.","PeriodicalId":331401,"journal":{"name":"Michigan Journal of International Law","volume":"325 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trade and Inequality: Economic Justice and the Developing World\",\"authors\":\"F. Garcia\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.240611\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article develops a Rawlsian framework for the evaluation of the justice of contemporary international trade law. Given the problem of inequality between states, liberal justification of the contemporary international economic system requires wealthier states to pursue redistributive policies through international trade law, as a consequence of an international version of Rawls' second principle of justice. In fact, international trade law recognizes the principle of special and different treatment towards developing states, which under this analysis can be seen as one response to the redistributive imperative. If so, then contemporary special and differential treatment practice in the WTO and in U.S. hemispheric trade policy, and in the contemplated Free Trade Area of the Americas, must be significantly reformed if special and differential treatment is to serve as a policy through which wealthier states can discharge their moral obligations, and the article concludes with recommendations for appropriate changes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":331401,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Michigan Journal of International Law\",\"volume\":\"325 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Michigan Journal of International Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.240611\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Michigan Journal of International Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.240611","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

本文发展了一个罗尔斯式的框架来评价当代国际贸易法的公正性。考虑到国家间不平等的问题,当代国际经济体系的自由主义辩护要求富裕国家通过国际贸易法推行再分配政策,这是罗尔斯第二正义原则的国际版本的结果。事实上,国际贸易法承认对发展中国家给予特殊和差别待遇的原则,根据这种分析,这可以被视为对再分配必要性的一种回应。如果是这样,那么,如果要使特殊和差别待遇成为富裕国家履行其道德义务的一项政策,那么世贸组织和美国半球贸易政策以及设想中的美洲自由贸易区中的当代特殊和差别待遇实践必须进行重大改革。文章最后提出了适当改变的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Trade and Inequality: Economic Justice and the Developing World
This article develops a Rawlsian framework for the evaluation of the justice of contemporary international trade law. Given the problem of inequality between states, liberal justification of the contemporary international economic system requires wealthier states to pursue redistributive policies through international trade law, as a consequence of an international version of Rawls' second principle of justice. In fact, international trade law recognizes the principle of special and different treatment towards developing states, which under this analysis can be seen as one response to the redistributive imperative. If so, then contemporary special and differential treatment practice in the WTO and in U.S. hemispheric trade policy, and in the contemplated Free Trade Area of the Americas, must be significantly reformed if special and differential treatment is to serve as a policy through which wealthier states can discharge their moral obligations, and the article concludes with recommendations for appropriate changes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信