{"title":"贸易与不平等:经济正义与发展中国家","authors":"F. Garcia","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.240611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article develops a Rawlsian framework for the evaluation of the justice of contemporary international trade law. Given the problem of inequality between states, liberal justification of the contemporary international economic system requires wealthier states to pursue redistributive policies through international trade law, as a consequence of an international version of Rawls' second principle of justice. In fact, international trade law recognizes the principle of special and different treatment towards developing states, which under this analysis can be seen as one response to the redistributive imperative. If so, then contemporary special and differential treatment practice in the WTO and in U.S. hemispheric trade policy, and in the contemplated Free Trade Area of the Americas, must be significantly reformed if special and differential treatment is to serve as a policy through which wealthier states can discharge their moral obligations, and the article concludes with recommendations for appropriate changes.","PeriodicalId":331401,"journal":{"name":"Michigan Journal of International Law","volume":"325 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trade and Inequality: Economic Justice and the Developing World\",\"authors\":\"F. Garcia\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.240611\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article develops a Rawlsian framework for the evaluation of the justice of contemporary international trade law. Given the problem of inequality between states, liberal justification of the contemporary international economic system requires wealthier states to pursue redistributive policies through international trade law, as a consequence of an international version of Rawls' second principle of justice. In fact, international trade law recognizes the principle of special and different treatment towards developing states, which under this analysis can be seen as one response to the redistributive imperative. If so, then contemporary special and differential treatment practice in the WTO and in U.S. hemispheric trade policy, and in the contemplated Free Trade Area of the Americas, must be significantly reformed if special and differential treatment is to serve as a policy through which wealthier states can discharge their moral obligations, and the article concludes with recommendations for appropriate changes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":331401,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Michigan Journal of International Law\",\"volume\":\"325 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Michigan Journal of International Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.240611\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Michigan Journal of International Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.240611","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Trade and Inequality: Economic Justice and the Developing World
This article develops a Rawlsian framework for the evaluation of the justice of contemporary international trade law. Given the problem of inequality between states, liberal justification of the contemporary international economic system requires wealthier states to pursue redistributive policies through international trade law, as a consequence of an international version of Rawls' second principle of justice. In fact, international trade law recognizes the principle of special and different treatment towards developing states, which under this analysis can be seen as one response to the redistributive imperative. If so, then contemporary special and differential treatment practice in the WTO and in U.S. hemispheric trade policy, and in the contemplated Free Trade Area of the Americas, must be significantly reformed if special and differential treatment is to serve as a policy through which wealthier states can discharge their moral obligations, and the article concludes with recommendations for appropriate changes.