迈向软件操作安全标准:建模IEC 61508第3部分

Alois Mayr, Reinhold Plösch, Matthias Saft
{"title":"迈向软件操作安全标准:建模IEC 61508第3部分","authors":"Alois Mayr, Reinhold Plösch, Matthias Saft","doi":"10.1109/ECBS.2011.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Safety standards are an important means for developing safety-critical (software) systems. Usually they provide a set of requirements and recommendations in order to support implementing safe software, such as the prominent IEC 61508 functional safety standard. Meeting them leads to safer software and reduces the likelihood for harms on people and environment. But for both, the development team and assessors, the application of the standard in practice is difficult and often leads to problems due to unclear requirements and (missing) acceptance criteria. For this purpose a quality model for the safety standard helps applying the standard objectively and provides guidance for the software development team. Concrete measures and rules of code, architecture and documentation analysis tools help to operationalize the standard that is covered by the quality model. Using documentation analysis tools helps supporting the project lead for determining the quality of the input and output artifacts of the lifecycle phases. The application of the operational quality model for continuous quality assessments of software projects may contribute to emerging a safety culture in the organization as the developers become more safety aware. In a first analysis we found out that over 50 percent of the analyzed tables in the annexes of IEC 61508 part 3 can be measured 'largely' by means of such automatic measurement tools. Using tools is important for the continuous quality assessment. However, we still need to analyze the rest of the standard's software part and apply it to projects in order to validate this approach. In conclusion, the focus of this paper is to show the need for an operational quality model for objectively applying the safety standard and for continuously giving guidance for stakeholders in the development process for safety-critical software.","PeriodicalId":151932,"journal":{"name":"2011 18th IEEE International Conference and Workshops on Engineering of Computer-Based Systems","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards an Operational Safety Standard for Software: Modelling IEC 61508 Part 3\",\"authors\":\"Alois Mayr, Reinhold Plösch, Matthias Saft\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ECBS.2011.8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Safety standards are an important means for developing safety-critical (software) systems. Usually they provide a set of requirements and recommendations in order to support implementing safe software, such as the prominent IEC 61508 functional safety standard. Meeting them leads to safer software and reduces the likelihood for harms on people and environment. But for both, the development team and assessors, the application of the standard in practice is difficult and often leads to problems due to unclear requirements and (missing) acceptance criteria. For this purpose a quality model for the safety standard helps applying the standard objectively and provides guidance for the software development team. Concrete measures and rules of code, architecture and documentation analysis tools help to operationalize the standard that is covered by the quality model. Using documentation analysis tools helps supporting the project lead for determining the quality of the input and output artifacts of the lifecycle phases. The application of the operational quality model for continuous quality assessments of software projects may contribute to emerging a safety culture in the organization as the developers become more safety aware. In a first analysis we found out that over 50 percent of the analyzed tables in the annexes of IEC 61508 part 3 can be measured 'largely' by means of such automatic measurement tools. Using tools is important for the continuous quality assessment. However, we still need to analyze the rest of the standard's software part and apply it to projects in order to validate this approach. In conclusion, the focus of this paper is to show the need for an operational quality model for objectively applying the safety standard and for continuously giving guidance for stakeholders in the development process for safety-critical software.\",\"PeriodicalId\":151932,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 18th IEEE International Conference and Workshops on Engineering of Computer-Based Systems\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 18th IEEE International Conference and Workshops on Engineering of Computer-Based Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ECBS.2011.8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 18th IEEE International Conference and Workshops on Engineering of Computer-Based Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ECBS.2011.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

安全标准是开发安全关键(软件)系统的重要手段。通常,他们会提供一组要求和建议,以支持安全软件的实施,例如著名的IEC 61508功能安全标准。满足这些要求会带来更安全的软件,并减少对人类和环境造成危害的可能性。但是对于开发团队和评估人员来说,在实践中应用标准是困难的,并且由于需求不明确和(缺少)接受标准而经常导致问题。为此目的,安全标准的质量模型有助于客观地应用标准,并为软件开发团队提供指导。代码、架构和文档分析工具的具体度量和规则有助于实现质量模型所涵盖的标准。使用文档分析工具有助于支持项目负责人确定生命周期阶段的输入和输出工件的质量。对软件项目进行持续质量评估的操作质量模型的应用可能有助于在组织中形成一种安全文化,因为开发人员变得更加安全意识。在第一次分析中,我们发现IEC 61508第3部分附件中超过50%的分析表可以通过这种自动测量工具进行“大部分”测量。使用工具对于持续的质量评估是很重要的。然而,我们仍然需要分析标准的软件部分的其余部分,并将其应用到项目中,以便验证这种方法。综上所述,本文的重点是展示需要一个操作质量模型,以便客观地应用安全标准,并在安全关键软件的开发过程中不断地为涉众提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Towards an Operational Safety Standard for Software: Modelling IEC 61508 Part 3
Safety standards are an important means for developing safety-critical (software) systems. Usually they provide a set of requirements and recommendations in order to support implementing safe software, such as the prominent IEC 61508 functional safety standard. Meeting them leads to safer software and reduces the likelihood for harms on people and environment. But for both, the development team and assessors, the application of the standard in practice is difficult and often leads to problems due to unclear requirements and (missing) acceptance criteria. For this purpose a quality model for the safety standard helps applying the standard objectively and provides guidance for the software development team. Concrete measures and rules of code, architecture and documentation analysis tools help to operationalize the standard that is covered by the quality model. Using documentation analysis tools helps supporting the project lead for determining the quality of the input and output artifacts of the lifecycle phases. The application of the operational quality model for continuous quality assessments of software projects may contribute to emerging a safety culture in the organization as the developers become more safety aware. In a first analysis we found out that over 50 percent of the analyzed tables in the annexes of IEC 61508 part 3 can be measured 'largely' by means of such automatic measurement tools. Using tools is important for the continuous quality assessment. However, we still need to analyze the rest of the standard's software part and apply it to projects in order to validate this approach. In conclusion, the focus of this paper is to show the need for an operational quality model for objectively applying the safety standard and for continuously giving guidance for stakeholders in the development process for safety-critical software.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信