Leontief和Samuelson关于非代换定理

Amanar Akhabbar
{"title":"Leontief和Samuelson关于非代换定理","authors":"Amanar Akhabbar","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3792039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The non-substitution theorem was first demonstrated by Samuelson and Georgescu-Roegen for a generalized model of Leontief. The theorem raised the question to know if the “deep-seated causes of [economic] development are to be found in the variations of the basic structural relationships themselves_ that is in modification of changes in consumers’ tastes_ and changes in the structure of productive processes” (Leontief). Without advanced empirical evidence, this episode brought at the core of linear economics the substitution principle and consider Leontief’s assumption of non-substitutions among production factors as simplistic and unsatisfactory. This can be viewed as an anomaly for the philosophy of science: a change in a research program without empirical anomalies but only a certain epistemological and theoretical context.","PeriodicalId":224430,"journal":{"name":"Decision-Making in Economics eJournal","volume":"34 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Leontief and Samuelson on the Non-Substitution Theorem\",\"authors\":\"Amanar Akhabbar\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3792039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The non-substitution theorem was first demonstrated by Samuelson and Georgescu-Roegen for a generalized model of Leontief. The theorem raised the question to know if the “deep-seated causes of [economic] development are to be found in the variations of the basic structural relationships themselves_ that is in modification of changes in consumers’ tastes_ and changes in the structure of productive processes” (Leontief). Without advanced empirical evidence, this episode brought at the core of linear economics the substitution principle and consider Leontief’s assumption of non-substitutions among production factors as simplistic and unsatisfactory. This can be viewed as an anomaly for the philosophy of science: a change in a research program without empirical anomalies but only a certain epistemological and theoretical context.\",\"PeriodicalId\":224430,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Decision-Making in Economics eJournal\",\"volume\":\"34 3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Decision-Making in Economics eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3792039\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Decision-Making in Economics eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3792039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

非代换定理首先由Samuelson和Georgescu-Roegen为Leontief的广义模型证明。这个定理提出了这样一个问题:是否“[经济]发展的深层原因是在基本结构关系本身的变化中找到的——也就是说,在消费者口味的变化和生产过程结构的变化中找到的”(Leontief)。在没有先进的经验证据的情况下,这一事件将替代原则带入了线性经济学的核心,并认为列昂蒂夫关于生产要素之间不可替代的假设过于简单化,令人不满意。这可以被看作是科学哲学的一种异常:一种没有经验异常的研究计划的变化,而只是一种特定的认识论和理论背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Leontief and Samuelson on the Non-Substitution Theorem
The non-substitution theorem was first demonstrated by Samuelson and Georgescu-Roegen for a generalized model of Leontief. The theorem raised the question to know if the “deep-seated causes of [economic] development are to be found in the variations of the basic structural relationships themselves_ that is in modification of changes in consumers’ tastes_ and changes in the structure of productive processes” (Leontief). Without advanced empirical evidence, this episode brought at the core of linear economics the substitution principle and consider Leontief’s assumption of non-substitutions among production factors as simplistic and unsatisfactory. This can be viewed as an anomaly for the philosophy of science: a change in a research program without empirical anomalies but only a certain epistemological and theoretical context.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信