两种增长模式

Andrew Smithers
{"title":"两种增长模式","authors":"Andrew Smithers","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780198836117.003.0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In order to devise an appropriate policy to boost growth it is essential to understand its causes, which in Solow’s accounting framework depend on changes in capital, labour, and technology. Both the model discussed here and the standard consensus interpretation follow Solow, but differ significantly with regard to their results and the appropriate policies they indicate. The one set out here is more optimistic: it shows that growth can be advanced through additional investment not just from changes in technology. This chapter argues that the consensus approach is unscientific because untestable and that, in, contrast, the model set out here is testable and robust when tested and should therefore be preferred. The two key differences in the models which produce this divergence are the way in which capital volumes are calculated and the influences other than technology which determine the level of investment and the volume of the capital stock.","PeriodicalId":134328,"journal":{"name":"Productivity and the Bonus Culture","volume":"90 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Two Models of Growth\",\"authors\":\"Andrew Smithers\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/OSO/9780198836117.003.0008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In order to devise an appropriate policy to boost growth it is essential to understand its causes, which in Solow’s accounting framework depend on changes in capital, labour, and technology. Both the model discussed here and the standard consensus interpretation follow Solow, but differ significantly with regard to their results and the appropriate policies they indicate. The one set out here is more optimistic: it shows that growth can be advanced through additional investment not just from changes in technology. This chapter argues that the consensus approach is unscientific because untestable and that, in, contrast, the model set out here is testable and robust when tested and should therefore be preferred. The two key differences in the models which produce this divergence are the way in which capital volumes are calculated and the influences other than technology which determine the level of investment and the volume of the capital stock.\",\"PeriodicalId\":134328,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Productivity and the Bonus Culture\",\"volume\":\"90 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Productivity and the Bonus Culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780198836117.003.0008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Productivity and the Bonus Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780198836117.003.0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了制定一项适当的政策来促进增长,有必要了解其原因,在索洛的会计框架中,这些原因取决于资本、劳动力和技术的变化。这里讨论的模型和标准共识解释都遵循索洛,但在结果和所指出的适当政策方面存在显著差异。这里提出的观点更为乐观:它表明,增长可以通过增加投资来推动,而不仅仅是通过技术变革。本章认为,共识方法是不科学的,因为它是不可测试的,相反,这里列出的模型是可测试的,并且在测试时是健壮的,因此应该首选。产生这种差异的模型的两个关键差异是计算资本量的方式以及决定投资水平和资本存量的技术以外的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Two Models of Growth
In order to devise an appropriate policy to boost growth it is essential to understand its causes, which in Solow’s accounting framework depend on changes in capital, labour, and technology. Both the model discussed here and the standard consensus interpretation follow Solow, but differ significantly with regard to their results and the appropriate policies they indicate. The one set out here is more optimistic: it shows that growth can be advanced through additional investment not just from changes in technology. This chapter argues that the consensus approach is unscientific because untestable and that, in, contrast, the model set out here is testable and robust when tested and should therefore be preferred. The two key differences in the models which produce this divergence are the way in which capital volumes are calculated and the influences other than technology which determine the level of investment and the volume of the capital stock.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信