协作机器人规划中人类参与的实证研究

Joao Paulo Jacomini Prioli, Shengyu Liu, Yinfeng Shen, V. Huynh, J. L. Rickli, Hyung-Jeong Yang, Soo-Hyung Kim, Kyoung-Yun Kim
{"title":"协作机器人规划中人类参与的实证研究","authors":"Joao Paulo Jacomini Prioli, Shengyu Liu, Yinfeng Shen, V. Huynh, J. L. Rickli, Hyung-Jeong Yang, Soo-Hyung Kim, Kyoung-Yun Kim","doi":"10.3233/jid-221012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The need for flexible production has turned manufacturing’s attention to integrate fast and uncomplicated solutions. Collaborative robots (cobots) have been considered the most impactful technology due to their versatility and human-robot interaction feature. Its implementation requires expertise in both process and cobot programming. Consequently, demand for effective programming training has increased over the past years. This paper, then, aims to design and explore a smart cobot programming system and conduct an empirical study to understand human engagement and programming performance. A repertory grid is employed based on cobot experts to understand different cobot programming approaches. Meaningful insights were considered to design and implement a smart programming system configuration. Then, an empirical programming study was performed considering cobot expertise and human engagement. Results demonstrated similarities and disparities in data collected, which was inferred to indicate differences in cobot programming behavior. Finally, the work identifies and discusses patterns to differentiate programmer expertise levels and behaviors.","PeriodicalId":342559,"journal":{"name":"J. Integr. Des. Process. Sci.","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Empirical study for human engagement in collaborative robot programming\",\"authors\":\"Joao Paulo Jacomini Prioli, Shengyu Liu, Yinfeng Shen, V. Huynh, J. L. Rickli, Hyung-Jeong Yang, Soo-Hyung Kim, Kyoung-Yun Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/jid-221012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The need for flexible production has turned manufacturing’s attention to integrate fast and uncomplicated solutions. Collaborative robots (cobots) have been considered the most impactful technology due to their versatility and human-robot interaction feature. Its implementation requires expertise in both process and cobot programming. Consequently, demand for effective programming training has increased over the past years. This paper, then, aims to design and explore a smart cobot programming system and conduct an empirical study to understand human engagement and programming performance. A repertory grid is employed based on cobot experts to understand different cobot programming approaches. Meaningful insights were considered to design and implement a smart programming system configuration. Then, an empirical programming study was performed considering cobot expertise and human engagement. Results demonstrated similarities and disparities in data collected, which was inferred to indicate differences in cobot programming behavior. Finally, the work identifies and discusses patterns to differentiate programmer expertise levels and behaviors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":342559,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"J. Integr. Des. Process. Sci.\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"J. Integr. Des. Process. Sci.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/jid-221012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J. Integr. Des. Process. Sci.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/jid-221012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

灵活生产的需求已经将制造业的注意力转向集成快速和简单的解决方案。协作机器人(cobots)由于其多功能性和人机交互特性而被认为是最具影响力的技术。它的实现需要流程和协作机器人编程方面的专业知识。因此,对有效编程培训的需求在过去几年中有所增加。因此,本文旨在设计和探索一个智能协作机器人编程系统,并对人类参与和编程性能进行实证研究。采用基于协作机器人专家的库存网格来理解不同的协作机器人编程方法。在设计和实现智能编程系统配置时,考虑了有意义的见解。然后,考虑协作机器人专业知识和人类参与,进行了实证规划研究。结果显示了所收集数据的相似性和差异性,这可以推断出协作机器人编程行为的差异。最后,本书确定并讨论了区分程序员专业水平和行为的模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Empirical study for human engagement in collaborative robot programming
The need for flexible production has turned manufacturing’s attention to integrate fast and uncomplicated solutions. Collaborative robots (cobots) have been considered the most impactful technology due to their versatility and human-robot interaction feature. Its implementation requires expertise in both process and cobot programming. Consequently, demand for effective programming training has increased over the past years. This paper, then, aims to design and explore a smart cobot programming system and conduct an empirical study to understand human engagement and programming performance. A repertory grid is employed based on cobot experts to understand different cobot programming approaches. Meaningful insights were considered to design and implement a smart programming system configuration. Then, an empirical programming study was performed considering cobot expertise and human engagement. Results demonstrated similarities and disparities in data collected, which was inferred to indicate differences in cobot programming behavior. Finally, the work identifies and discusses patterns to differentiate programmer expertise levels and behaviors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信