A. Aloman, A. Ispas, P. Ciotirnae, R. Sanchez-Iborra, M. Cano
{"title":"移动网络中使用MPEG DASH、RTSP和RTMP的视频流性能评估","authors":"A. Aloman, A. Ispas, P. Ciotirnae, R. Sanchez-Iborra, M. Cano","doi":"10.1109/WMNC.2015.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nearly three-fourths of the world's mobile data traffic will be video in the next 5 years. Video is one of the most demanding services in terms of network efficiency, reliability, and quality. In this work, we present a comparative performance evaluation of three different video streaming protocols, namely MPEG-DASH, RTSP, and RTMP for both on-demand and live video streaming over 4G and Wi-Fi (under different network conditions) in terms of Quality of user Experience (QoE). QoE measurements have been done (i) applying the recently standardized ITU-T Rec P-1201.1, which specifies the model algorithm for non-intrusive monitoring of video quality of IP-based video services based on packet header information for the lower resolution application area, and (ii) an extended non-standardized parametric model for comparative purposes. Results suggest that RTSP is more efficient than MPEG DASH for starting the video playback, but at the expense of decreasing QoE due to packet losses. We have also detected that PLR has a bigger influence over re-buffering events than end-to-end delay both in 4G/LTE and Wi-Fi, and that a slightly best quality is achieved by using QPSK at 20 MHz in 4G/LTE. QoE is noticeably higher with MPEG DASH than that attained by using RTSP, but slightly worse than that obtained with RTMP. Finally, our findings suggest that the use of parametric models for video QoE evaluation should be carefully review in terms of the weight that packet losses should have when streaming protocols based on reliable transport protocols (e.g., TCP) are used.","PeriodicalId":240086,"journal":{"name":"2015 8th IFIP Wireless and Mobile Networking Conference (WMNC)","volume":"26 6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"31","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance Evaluation of Video Streaming Using MPEG DASH, RTSP, and RTMP in Mobile Networks\",\"authors\":\"A. Aloman, A. Ispas, P. Ciotirnae, R. Sanchez-Iborra, M. Cano\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/WMNC.2015.12\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Nearly three-fourths of the world's mobile data traffic will be video in the next 5 years. Video is one of the most demanding services in terms of network efficiency, reliability, and quality. In this work, we present a comparative performance evaluation of three different video streaming protocols, namely MPEG-DASH, RTSP, and RTMP for both on-demand and live video streaming over 4G and Wi-Fi (under different network conditions) in terms of Quality of user Experience (QoE). QoE measurements have been done (i) applying the recently standardized ITU-T Rec P-1201.1, which specifies the model algorithm for non-intrusive monitoring of video quality of IP-based video services based on packet header information for the lower resolution application area, and (ii) an extended non-standardized parametric model for comparative purposes. Results suggest that RTSP is more efficient than MPEG DASH for starting the video playback, but at the expense of decreasing QoE due to packet losses. We have also detected that PLR has a bigger influence over re-buffering events than end-to-end delay both in 4G/LTE and Wi-Fi, and that a slightly best quality is achieved by using QPSK at 20 MHz in 4G/LTE. QoE is noticeably higher with MPEG DASH than that attained by using RTSP, but slightly worse than that obtained with RTMP. Finally, our findings suggest that the use of parametric models for video QoE evaluation should be carefully review in terms of the weight that packet losses should have when streaming protocols based on reliable transport protocols (e.g., TCP) are used.\",\"PeriodicalId\":240086,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 8th IFIP Wireless and Mobile Networking Conference (WMNC)\",\"volume\":\"26 6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"31\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 8th IFIP Wireless and Mobile Networking Conference (WMNC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/WMNC.2015.12\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 8th IFIP Wireless and Mobile Networking Conference (WMNC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WMNC.2015.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31
摘要
未来5年,全球近四分之三的移动数据流量将是视频流量。视频是对网络效率、可靠性和质量要求最高的业务之一。在这项工作中,我们在用户体验质量(QoE)方面对三种不同的视频流协议进行了比较性能评估,即MPEG-DASH、RTSP和RTMP,用于4G和Wi-Fi(不同网络条件下)的点播和直播视频流。QoE测量已经完成(i)应用最近标准化的ITU-T Rec p - 12011 .1,该标准规定了基于低分辨率应用区域的分组报头信息对基于ip的视频业务的视频质量进行非侵入式监控的模型算法,以及(ii)用于比较目的的扩展非标准化参数模型。结果表明,RTSP在启动视频播放方面比MPEG DASH更有效,但代价是由于丢包而降低QoE。我们还检测到,在4G/LTE和Wi-Fi中,PLR对重新缓冲事件的影响比端到端延迟更大,并且在4G/LTE中使用20mhz的QPSK可以实现稍微最好的质量。使用MPEG DASH获得的QoE明显高于使用RTSP获得的QoE,但略低于使用RTMP获得的QoE。最后,我们的研究结果表明,当使用基于可靠传输协议(例如TCP)的流协议时,应该仔细审查用于视频QoE评估的参数模型的权重。
Performance Evaluation of Video Streaming Using MPEG DASH, RTSP, and RTMP in Mobile Networks
Nearly three-fourths of the world's mobile data traffic will be video in the next 5 years. Video is one of the most demanding services in terms of network efficiency, reliability, and quality. In this work, we present a comparative performance evaluation of three different video streaming protocols, namely MPEG-DASH, RTSP, and RTMP for both on-demand and live video streaming over 4G and Wi-Fi (under different network conditions) in terms of Quality of user Experience (QoE). QoE measurements have been done (i) applying the recently standardized ITU-T Rec P-1201.1, which specifies the model algorithm for non-intrusive monitoring of video quality of IP-based video services based on packet header information for the lower resolution application area, and (ii) an extended non-standardized parametric model for comparative purposes. Results suggest that RTSP is more efficient than MPEG DASH for starting the video playback, but at the expense of decreasing QoE due to packet losses. We have also detected that PLR has a bigger influence over re-buffering events than end-to-end delay both in 4G/LTE and Wi-Fi, and that a slightly best quality is achieved by using QPSK at 20 MHz in 4G/LTE. QoE is noticeably higher with MPEG DASH than that attained by using RTSP, but slightly worse than that obtained with RTMP. Finally, our findings suggest that the use of parametric models for video QoE evaluation should be carefully review in terms of the weight that packet losses should have when streaming protocols based on reliable transport protocols (e.g., TCP) are used.