Ioana Maria Costea, Facultatea de Drept a Universității „Alexandru Ioan Cuza” din Iași
{"title":"Transpunerea Directivei PIF și evaziunea fiscală la TVA","authors":"Ioana Maria Costea, Facultatea de Drept a Universității „Alexandru Ioan Cuza” din Iași","doi":"10.31178/aubd.2020.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Our study proposes a two-step analysis of the concept of VAT fraud, a time limit represented by the adoption of Directive (EU) 2017/1371 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2017 on the fight against fraud to the Union’s financial interests by means of criminal law. Through our analytical approach, which uses the comparative method meticulously under the auspices of the limited interpretation imposed by criminal law, specific hypotheses are revealed regarding the forms of tax evasion in the European Union framework for the operation of value added tax. Equally, the study seeks to identify the blind spots of national law and the directions for refining tax evasion legislation.","PeriodicalId":142426,"journal":{"name":"Analele Universitării din București Drept","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analele Universitării din București Drept","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31178/aubd.2020.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们的研究提出了对增值税欺诈概念的两步分析,这是一个时间限制,由欧洲议会和理事会于2017年7月5日通过的关于通过刑法打击欧盟经济利益欺诈的指令(EU) 2017/1371所代表。通过我们的分析方法,在刑法的有限解释的支持下,细致地使用比较方法,揭示了关于欧盟增值税运作框架中逃税形式的具体假设。同时,本研究也试图找出各国法律的盲点和完善逃税立法的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Transpunerea Directivei PIF și evaziunea fiscală la TVA
Our study proposes a two-step analysis of the concept of VAT fraud, a time limit represented by the adoption of Directive (EU) 2017/1371 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2017 on the fight against fraud to the Union’s financial interests by means of criminal law. Through our analytical approach, which uses the comparative method meticulously under the auspices of the limited interpretation imposed by criminal law, specific hypotheses are revealed regarding the forms of tax evasion in the European Union framework for the operation of value added tax. Equally, the study seeks to identify the blind spots of national law and the directions for refining tax evasion legislation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信