论俄罗斯程序法在审查与核查阶段对个人权利保护的合理平衡

G. Y. Borisevich
{"title":"论俄罗斯程序法在审查与核查阶段对个人权利保护的合理平衡","authors":"G. Y. Borisevich","doi":"10.17072/2619-0648-2018-2-90-102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"in the article, a number of situations are described that provide for a necessity to unify Russia's procedural law norms regulating such multisectoral institutions as appeal, cassation and supervisory proceedings. One of the purposes of this unification is a reasonable ensuring of protecting the rights of the individual in examination and verification phases of the civil, arbitration, administrative, criminal procedure. The following issues were reviewed: the right and term of appealing against the court decision, the rule of using the ways of appealing against court decisions until they are legally effective, reasons for reversing or changing the court decision, improvement of the legislative regulation of the first phase of the cassation procedure performed in accordance with Civil Procedural Code, Administrative Procedure Code, Criminal Procedural Code of the Russian Federation. The proposals were formulated on improving the procedural legislation. The need was shown for the concurrence in the positions of the legislators representing the four forms of the court procedures during the development and adoption of the laws regulating the mult-sectoral institutions","PeriodicalId":425086,"journal":{"name":"Ex jure","volume":"23 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ABOUT THE REASONABLE BALANCE IN PROTECTING THE RIGHTS OF AN INDIVIDUAL DURING THE EXAMINATION AND VERIFICATION PHASE IN RUSSIA'S PROCEDURAL LAW\",\"authors\":\"G. Y. Borisevich\",\"doi\":\"10.17072/2619-0648-2018-2-90-102\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"in the article, a number of situations are described that provide for a necessity to unify Russia's procedural law norms regulating such multisectoral institutions as appeal, cassation and supervisory proceedings. One of the purposes of this unification is a reasonable ensuring of protecting the rights of the individual in examination and verification phases of the civil, arbitration, administrative, criminal procedure. The following issues were reviewed: the right and term of appealing against the court decision, the rule of using the ways of appealing against court decisions until they are legally effective, reasons for reversing or changing the court decision, improvement of the legislative regulation of the first phase of the cassation procedure performed in accordance with Civil Procedural Code, Administrative Procedure Code, Criminal Procedural Code of the Russian Federation. The proposals were formulated on improving the procedural legislation. The need was shown for the concurrence in the positions of the legislators representing the four forms of the court procedures during the development and adoption of the laws regulating the mult-sectoral institutions\",\"PeriodicalId\":425086,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ex jure\",\"volume\":\"23 2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ex jure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17072/2619-0648-2018-2-90-102\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ex jure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17072/2619-0648-2018-2-90-102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

该条叙述了若干情况,说明有必要统一俄罗斯的程序法规范,规范诸如上诉、撤销和监督程序等多部门机构。这种统一的目的之一是在民事、仲裁、行政和刑事诉讼的审查和核查阶段合理保障个人的权利。审查了下列问题:对法院判决提出上诉的权利和期限、在法院判决具有法律效力之前使用上诉方式的规则、撤销或改变法院判决的理由、改进根据《俄罗斯联邦民事诉讼法》、《行政诉讼法》、《刑事诉讼法》执行的撤销上诉程序第一阶段的立法条例。这些建议是关于完善程序性立法的。在制定和通过管理多部门机构的法律期间,代表法院程序四种形式的立法者有必要在立场上达成一致
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ABOUT THE REASONABLE BALANCE IN PROTECTING THE RIGHTS OF AN INDIVIDUAL DURING THE EXAMINATION AND VERIFICATION PHASE IN RUSSIA'S PROCEDURAL LAW
in the article, a number of situations are described that provide for a necessity to unify Russia's procedural law norms regulating such multisectoral institutions as appeal, cassation and supervisory proceedings. One of the purposes of this unification is a reasonable ensuring of protecting the rights of the individual in examination and verification phases of the civil, arbitration, administrative, criminal procedure. The following issues were reviewed: the right and term of appealing against the court decision, the rule of using the ways of appealing against court decisions until they are legally effective, reasons for reversing or changing the court decision, improvement of the legislative regulation of the first phase of the cassation procedure performed in accordance with Civil Procedural Code, Administrative Procedure Code, Criminal Procedural Code of the Russian Federation. The proposals were formulated on improving the procedural legislation. The need was shown for the concurrence in the positions of the legislators representing the four forms of the court procedures during the development and adoption of the laws regulating the mult-sectoral institutions
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信