Axel Teich Geertinger
{"title":"Samlingsformidling gennem tematiske værkfortegnelser","authors":"Axel Teich Geertinger","doi":"10.7146/fof.v58i0.125304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Axel Teich Geertinger: Contextualising Library Collections through Thematic Catalogues \nBetween the years 2014 and 2019, Dansk Center for Musikudgivelse (DCM) (Danish centre for Music Editing) has published thematic-bibliographic catalogues of the works of four composers, in both digital and printed editions: Carl Nielsen, Johann Adolph Scheibe, J.P.E. Hartmann and Niels W. Gade. The concept and the software behind it were developed by DCM concurrently with the work on the actual catalogues’. DCM’s catalogues of the works are in keeping with a long tradition within musicology, in which such catalogues are a standard tool. In view of the particular situation for sources in Denmark, on the one hand, where most of the relevant material concerning Danish composers can be found in the Royal Danish Library’s collections, and the conversion of the catalogue concept to digital media on the other, DCM’s catalogues of works also gain a different perspective, so that they are not just a reference work for researchers, students and musicians, but also actual dissemination of the collection. While library catalogues’ perspective is fundamentally concentrated on specific items, catalogues of works – as the name says – concentrate on works. The works perspective is appropriate to provide an overview of all the material and information associated with a work and can thus put each source into a context. With links directly to library entries and digitisations, the catalogue can offer an alternative, more generalised and holistic approach to the library’s material than library catalogues. There are also links to related material, such as concurrent reviews in Mediestream. This article presents the catalogue of works concept and discusses its prospects and limitations, in particular from a library perspective.","PeriodicalId":219437,"journal":{"name":"Fund og Forskning i Det Kongelige Biblioteks Samlinger","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fund og Forskning i Det Kongelige Biblioteks Samlinger","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7146/fof.v58i0.125304","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2014年至2019年间,丹麦音乐编辑中心(DCM)出版了四位作曲家作品的主题书目目录,包括数字版和印刷版:卡尔·尼尔森、约翰·阿道夫·舍伊贝、J.P.E.哈特曼和尼尔斯·盖德。这个概念及其背后的软件是由DCM与实际目录的工作同时开发的。DCM的作品目录与音乐学的悠久传统保持一致,这种目录是一种标准工具。鉴于丹麦资源的特殊情况,一方面,关于丹麦作曲家的大部分相关资料都可以在丹麦皇家图书馆的馆藏中找到,另一方面,目录概念向数字媒体的转换,DCM的作品目录也获得了不同的视角,因此它们不仅是研究人员,学生和音乐家的参考工作,而且是收藏的实际传播。图书馆目录的视角基本上集中在具体的项目上,而作品目录——顾名思义——集中在作品上。作品透视图适合于提供与作品相关的所有材料和信息的概述,因此可以将每个来源置于上下文中。通过直接链接到图书馆条目和数字化,目录可以提供一种替代方法,比图书馆目录更通用和全面的方法来获取图书馆的资料。也有相关材料的链接,比如Mediestream中的并发评论。本文提出了作品目录概念,并讨论了其前景和局限性,特别是从图书馆的角度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Samlingsformidling gennem tematiske værkfortegnelser
Axel Teich Geertinger: Contextualising Library Collections through Thematic Catalogues Between the years 2014 and 2019, Dansk Center for Musikudgivelse (DCM) (Danish centre for Music Editing) has published thematic-bibliographic catalogues of the works of four composers, in both digital and printed editions: Carl Nielsen, Johann Adolph Scheibe, J.P.E. Hartmann and Niels W. Gade. The concept and the software behind it were developed by DCM concurrently with the work on the actual catalogues’. DCM’s catalogues of the works are in keeping with a long tradition within musicology, in which such catalogues are a standard tool. In view of the particular situation for sources in Denmark, on the one hand, where most of the relevant material concerning Danish composers can be found in the Royal Danish Library’s collections, and the conversion of the catalogue concept to digital media on the other, DCM’s catalogues of works also gain a different perspective, so that they are not just a reference work for researchers, students and musicians, but also actual dissemination of the collection. While library catalogues’ perspective is fundamentally concentrated on specific items, catalogues of works – as the name says – concentrate on works. The works perspective is appropriate to provide an overview of all the material and information associated with a work and can thus put each source into a context. With links directly to library entries and digitisations, the catalogue can offer an alternative, more generalised and holistic approach to the library’s material than library catalogues. There are also links to related material, such as concurrent reviews in Mediestream. This article presents the catalogue of works concept and discusses its prospects and limitations, in particular from a library perspective.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信