埃塞俄比亚流感哨点监测系统评价

D. Takele, S. Mohamed
{"title":"埃塞俄比亚流感哨点监测系统评价","authors":"D. Takele, S. Mohamed","doi":"10.11648/J.ACIS.20210901.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Ethiopia conducts influenza sentinel surveillance since 2008 in eight sites through the coordination of Ethiopian Public Health Institute although little is known whether the system meets its objective. Hence, this evaluation is conducted to evaluate the sentinel surveillance attributes, purposes and its operation system. Method: A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted from February 15-30, 2017 in all eight Sentinel sites. Data were collected using US-CDC updated surveillance guideline and Interview with influenza sentinel surveillance focal persons, regional public health emergency officers and national surveillance officers. Case based reports of influenza like illness and severe acute respiratory illness were also reviewed. Secondary data were collected from the national public health emergency management center based at EPHI. We analyzed and compiled the data. Results: Not all the visited health facilities have posted the ILI and SARI cases definition. None of the sentinel sites have been reporting influenza data to their next higher level but to the national PHEM (NIL). All focal persons have responded that they are expected to do so. Data is only being analyzed by national PHEM. Supportive supervision was done this month (February, 2017) since 2014. Laboratory feedback (test result) has been provided irregularly since May 2016 by the national influenza laboratory to sentinel sites and respective regional PHEM. All of focal persons have taken training on influenza surveillance. The positive predictive value (PPV) was 21.35% (n=4922). Among a total of 5,097 case based reports from 2008-2016, 47 (0.9%) age variable, 385 (7.5%) temperature variable, and 103 (2%) date of specimen collection were not filled. Conclusion: Although focal persons are satisfied with the forms and procedures involved, they are not filling formats properly as expected and reporting regularly as scheduled neither to the national PHEM nor to the next higher level. The influenza sentinel surveillance system has proven to be useful in providing virological data used to characterize and monitor influenza trends in Ethiopia. Continuous supportive supervision should be in placed using checklist to increase the quality of data. Data should be continuously analyzed and feedback should be given periodically to health care provider and partners.","PeriodicalId":205084,"journal":{"name":"Automation, Control and Intelligent Systems","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Ethiopian Influenza Sentinel Surveillance System\",\"authors\":\"D. Takele, S. Mohamed\",\"doi\":\"10.11648/J.ACIS.20210901.12\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Ethiopia conducts influenza sentinel surveillance since 2008 in eight sites through the coordination of Ethiopian Public Health Institute although little is known whether the system meets its objective. Hence, this evaluation is conducted to evaluate the sentinel surveillance attributes, purposes and its operation system. Method: A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted from February 15-30, 2017 in all eight Sentinel sites. Data were collected using US-CDC updated surveillance guideline and Interview with influenza sentinel surveillance focal persons, regional public health emergency officers and national surveillance officers. Case based reports of influenza like illness and severe acute respiratory illness were also reviewed. Secondary data were collected from the national public health emergency management center based at EPHI. We analyzed and compiled the data. Results: Not all the visited health facilities have posted the ILI and SARI cases definition. None of the sentinel sites have been reporting influenza data to their next higher level but to the national PHEM (NIL). All focal persons have responded that they are expected to do so. Data is only being analyzed by national PHEM. Supportive supervision was done this month (February, 2017) since 2014. Laboratory feedback (test result) has been provided irregularly since May 2016 by the national influenza laboratory to sentinel sites and respective regional PHEM. All of focal persons have taken training on influenza surveillance. The positive predictive value (PPV) was 21.35% (n=4922). Among a total of 5,097 case based reports from 2008-2016, 47 (0.9%) age variable, 385 (7.5%) temperature variable, and 103 (2%) date of specimen collection were not filled. Conclusion: Although focal persons are satisfied with the forms and procedures involved, they are not filling formats properly as expected and reporting regularly as scheduled neither to the national PHEM nor to the next higher level. The influenza sentinel surveillance system has proven to be useful in providing virological data used to characterize and monitor influenza trends in Ethiopia. Continuous supportive supervision should be in placed using checklist to increase the quality of data. Data should be continuously analyzed and feedback should be given periodically to health care provider and partners.\",\"PeriodicalId\":205084,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Automation, Control and Intelligent Systems\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Automation, Control and Intelligent Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11648/J.ACIS.20210901.12\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Automation, Control and Intelligent Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/J.ACIS.20210901.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:自2008年以来,埃塞俄比亚通过埃塞俄比亚公共卫生研究所的协调,在八个地点开展了流感哨点监测,尽管人们对该系统是否达到其目标知之甚少。因此,对哨点监视的属性、目的及其操作系统进行评估。方法:于2017年2月15日至30日在所有8个哨点进行横断面描述性研究。数据收集使用美国疾病控制与预防中心更新的监测指南和对流感哨点监测焦点人、区域公共卫生应急官员和国家监测官员的访谈。还审查了流感样疾病和严重急性呼吸道疾病的病例报告。二级数据从设在EPHI的国家公共卫生应急管理中心收集。我们对数据进行了分析和汇编。结果:并非所有被访卫生机构都张贴了ILI和SARI病例定义。所有哨点都没有向更高一级报告流感数据,而是向国家PHEM (NIL)报告。所有协调人员都答复说,他们应该这样做。数据仅由国家PHEM进行分析。自2014年起,于本月(2017年2月)实施支持性监管。自2016年5月以来,国家流感实验室不定期向哨点和各区域PHEM提供实验室反馈(检测结果)。所有联络人都接受了流感监测方面的培训。阳性预测值(PPV)为21.35% (n=4922)。在2008-2016年共5097例病例报告中,年龄变量47例(0.9%),温度变量385例(7.5%),标本采集日期103例(2%)未填写。结论:虽然焦点人员对所涉及的表格和程序感到满意,但他们没有按照预期正确填写表格,也没有按时定期向国家PHEM报告,也没有向下一级报告。流感哨点监测系统已被证明在提供病毒学数据以描述和监测埃塞俄比亚的流感趋势方面是有用的。应使用检查表进行持续的支持性监督,以提高数据质量。应不断分析数据,并定期向卫生保健提供者和合作伙伴提供反馈。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Ethiopian Influenza Sentinel Surveillance System
Background: Ethiopia conducts influenza sentinel surveillance since 2008 in eight sites through the coordination of Ethiopian Public Health Institute although little is known whether the system meets its objective. Hence, this evaluation is conducted to evaluate the sentinel surveillance attributes, purposes and its operation system. Method: A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted from February 15-30, 2017 in all eight Sentinel sites. Data were collected using US-CDC updated surveillance guideline and Interview with influenza sentinel surveillance focal persons, regional public health emergency officers and national surveillance officers. Case based reports of influenza like illness and severe acute respiratory illness were also reviewed. Secondary data were collected from the national public health emergency management center based at EPHI. We analyzed and compiled the data. Results: Not all the visited health facilities have posted the ILI and SARI cases definition. None of the sentinel sites have been reporting influenza data to their next higher level but to the national PHEM (NIL). All focal persons have responded that they are expected to do so. Data is only being analyzed by national PHEM. Supportive supervision was done this month (February, 2017) since 2014. Laboratory feedback (test result) has been provided irregularly since May 2016 by the national influenza laboratory to sentinel sites and respective regional PHEM. All of focal persons have taken training on influenza surveillance. The positive predictive value (PPV) was 21.35% (n=4922). Among a total of 5,097 case based reports from 2008-2016, 47 (0.9%) age variable, 385 (7.5%) temperature variable, and 103 (2%) date of specimen collection were not filled. Conclusion: Although focal persons are satisfied with the forms and procedures involved, they are not filling formats properly as expected and reporting regularly as scheduled neither to the national PHEM nor to the next higher level. The influenza sentinel surveillance system has proven to be useful in providing virological data used to characterize and monitor influenza trends in Ethiopia. Continuous supportive supervision should be in placed using checklist to increase the quality of data. Data should be continuously analyzed and feedback should be given periodically to health care provider and partners.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信