改进了许多目标优化问题的二级排序

H. Singh, A. Isaacs, T. Ray, W. Smith
{"title":"改进了许多目标优化问题的二级排序","authors":"H. Singh, A. Isaacs, T. Ray, W. Smith","doi":"10.1145/1569901.1570190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many objective optimization refers to optimization problems for which the number of objectives is significantly greater than conventionally studied 2 or 3. For such problems, large number of solutions become non-dominated, which reduces the convergence pressure of the Evolutionary Algorithms~(EAs) towards the Pareto Optimal Front. Recently, alternate secondary ranking schemes for have been suggested for NSGA-II in lieu of crowding distance to expedite its convergence for many objective problems. In this paper, we improvise upon an existing scheme~(epsilon dominance). The proposed approach is found to perform better than the other substitute distance assignment methods for the problems studied in this paper. A new diversity metric has also been proposed, which can be used in order to compare the performance of the various EAs.","PeriodicalId":193093,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 11th Annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An improved secondary ranking for many objective optimization problems\",\"authors\":\"H. Singh, A. Isaacs, T. Ray, W. Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/1569901.1570190\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Many objective optimization refers to optimization problems for which the number of objectives is significantly greater than conventionally studied 2 or 3. For such problems, large number of solutions become non-dominated, which reduces the convergence pressure of the Evolutionary Algorithms~(EAs) towards the Pareto Optimal Front. Recently, alternate secondary ranking schemes for have been suggested for NSGA-II in lieu of crowding distance to expedite its convergence for many objective problems. In this paper, we improvise upon an existing scheme~(epsilon dominance). The proposed approach is found to perform better than the other substitute distance assignment methods for the problems studied in this paper. A new diversity metric has also been proposed, which can be used in order to compare the performance of the various EAs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":193093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 11th Annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 11th Annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/1569901.1570190\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 11th Annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1569901.1570190","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

许多目标优化是指目标数量明显大于传统研究的2或3的优化问题。对于这类问题,大量的解变得非支配,这降低了进化算法向Pareto最优前沿收敛的压力。近年来,为了加快NSGA-II在许多客观问题上的收敛速度,提出了替代拥挤距离的NSGA-II二级排序方案。在本文中,我们在一个已有的方案~(epsilon优势)上进行了即兴创作。对于本文研究的问题,所提出的方法比其他替代距离分配方法表现得更好。本文还提出了一种新的分集度量,可用于比较各种ea的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An improved secondary ranking for many objective optimization problems
Many objective optimization refers to optimization problems for which the number of objectives is significantly greater than conventionally studied 2 or 3. For such problems, large number of solutions become non-dominated, which reduces the convergence pressure of the Evolutionary Algorithms~(EAs) towards the Pareto Optimal Front. Recently, alternate secondary ranking schemes for have been suggested for NSGA-II in lieu of crowding distance to expedite its convergence for many objective problems. In this paper, we improvise upon an existing scheme~(epsilon dominance). The proposed approach is found to perform better than the other substitute distance assignment methods for the problems studied in this paper. A new diversity metric has also been proposed, which can be used in order to compare the performance of the various EAs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信