{"title":"生态实用主义的变革价值。布赖恩·g·诺顿的著作简介","authors":"Hicham-Stéphane Afeissa","doi":"10.5194/SAPIENS-1-51-2008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the space of only a few years, Bryan Norton has become one of the essential actors of environmental ethics through his launching of what has become one of its dominant trends: environmental pragmatism. Environmental pragmatism refuses to take a stance in the dispute between the defenders of anthropocentrist ethics and the supporters of nonanthropocentrist ethics. Instead, Norton prefers to distinguish between \"strong anthropocentrism\" and \"weak-or extended-anthropocentrism” and develops the idea that only the latter is capable of not under-estimating the diversity of instrumental values that humans may derive from the natural world. The practical difference between these two kinds of theories is considerable.","PeriodicalId":370994,"journal":{"name":"Surveys and Perspectives Integrating Environment and Society","volume":"142 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Transformative value of Ecological Pragmatism. An Introduction to the Work of Bryan G. Norton\",\"authors\":\"Hicham-Stéphane Afeissa\",\"doi\":\"10.5194/SAPIENS-1-51-2008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the space of only a few years, Bryan Norton has become one of the essential actors of environmental ethics through his launching of what has become one of its dominant trends: environmental pragmatism. Environmental pragmatism refuses to take a stance in the dispute between the defenders of anthropocentrist ethics and the supporters of nonanthropocentrist ethics. Instead, Norton prefers to distinguish between \\\"strong anthropocentrism\\\" and \\\"weak-or extended-anthropocentrism” and develops the idea that only the latter is capable of not under-estimating the diversity of instrumental values that humans may derive from the natural world. The practical difference between these two kinds of theories is considerable.\",\"PeriodicalId\":370994,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surveys and Perspectives Integrating Environment and Society\",\"volume\":\"142 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surveys and Perspectives Integrating Environment and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5194/SAPIENS-1-51-2008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surveys and Perspectives Integrating Environment and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/SAPIENS-1-51-2008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Transformative value of Ecological Pragmatism. An Introduction to the Work of Bryan G. Norton
In the space of only a few years, Bryan Norton has become one of the essential actors of environmental ethics through his launching of what has become one of its dominant trends: environmental pragmatism. Environmental pragmatism refuses to take a stance in the dispute between the defenders of anthropocentrist ethics and the supporters of nonanthropocentrist ethics. Instead, Norton prefers to distinguish between "strong anthropocentrism" and "weak-or extended-anthropocentrism” and develops the idea that only the latter is capable of not under-estimating the diversity of instrumental values that humans may derive from the natural world. The practical difference between these two kinds of theories is considerable.