生态实用主义的变革价值。布赖恩·g·诺顿的著作简介

Hicham-Stéphane Afeissa
{"title":"生态实用主义的变革价值。布赖恩·g·诺顿的著作简介","authors":"Hicham-Stéphane Afeissa","doi":"10.5194/SAPIENS-1-51-2008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the space of only a few years, Bryan Norton has become one of the essential actors of environmental ethics through his launching of what has become one of its dominant trends: environmental pragmatism. Environmental pragmatism refuses to take a stance in the dispute between the defenders of anthropocentrist ethics and the supporters of nonanthropocentrist ethics. Instead, Norton prefers to distinguish between \"strong anthropocentrism\" and \"weak-or extended-anthropocentrism” and develops the idea that only the latter is capable of not under-estimating the diversity of instrumental values that humans may derive from the natural world. The practical difference between these two kinds of theories is considerable.","PeriodicalId":370994,"journal":{"name":"Surveys and Perspectives Integrating Environment and Society","volume":"142 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Transformative value of Ecological Pragmatism. An Introduction to the Work of Bryan G. Norton\",\"authors\":\"Hicham-Stéphane Afeissa\",\"doi\":\"10.5194/SAPIENS-1-51-2008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the space of only a few years, Bryan Norton has become one of the essential actors of environmental ethics through his launching of what has become one of its dominant trends: environmental pragmatism. Environmental pragmatism refuses to take a stance in the dispute between the defenders of anthropocentrist ethics and the supporters of nonanthropocentrist ethics. Instead, Norton prefers to distinguish between \\\"strong anthropocentrism\\\" and \\\"weak-or extended-anthropocentrism” and develops the idea that only the latter is capable of not under-estimating the diversity of instrumental values that humans may derive from the natural world. The practical difference between these two kinds of theories is considerable.\",\"PeriodicalId\":370994,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surveys and Perspectives Integrating Environment and Society\",\"volume\":\"142 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surveys and Perspectives Integrating Environment and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5194/SAPIENS-1-51-2008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surveys and Perspectives Integrating Environment and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/SAPIENS-1-51-2008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

在短短几年的时间里,布莱恩·诺顿(Bryan Norton)通过发起环境伦理学的主导趋势之一:环境实用主义,已经成为环境伦理学的重要角色之一。环境实用主义拒绝在人类中心主义伦理学的捍卫者和非人类中心主义伦理学的支持者之间的争论中采取立场。相反,诺顿倾向于区分“强烈的人类中心主义”和“弱的或扩展的人类中心主义”,并发展出这样一种观点,即只有后者能够不低估人类可能从自然界获得的工具价值的多样性。这两种理论在实践上的差别是相当大的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Transformative value of Ecological Pragmatism. An Introduction to the Work of Bryan G. Norton
In the space of only a few years, Bryan Norton has become one of the essential actors of environmental ethics through his launching of what has become one of its dominant trends: environmental pragmatism. Environmental pragmatism refuses to take a stance in the dispute between the defenders of anthropocentrist ethics and the supporters of nonanthropocentrist ethics. Instead, Norton prefers to distinguish between "strong anthropocentrism" and "weak-or extended-anthropocentrism” and develops the idea that only the latter is capable of not under-estimating the diversity of instrumental values that humans may derive from the natural world. The practical difference between these two kinds of theories is considerable.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信