个人幸福,社会不幸:理解个人幸福账户的复杂性

David Tross
{"title":"个人幸福,社会不幸:理解个人幸福账户的复杂性","authors":"David Tross","doi":"10.46692/9781529206159.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While concerted, inter-disciplinary efforts have been made to measure happiness and wellbeing at national and international levels, an over-reliance on quantitative data generated through numerical self-reports has meant that a limited, thin- sliced picture of happiness has emerged. This chapter explores 200 accounts of happiness, generated through a 2013 Mass Observation directive, that provide a nuanced picture of happiness in the UK. The research found that when individuals talk about their happiness they mainly talk about their personal lives: their relationships and social and cultural engagements. Conversely, when they talk about unhappiness they often focus on social and political factors. This more socially and politically engaged aspect to lay happiness accounts highlights problems with conceptualizing and measuring a country’s happiness as the aggregate of individual self-reports; it also underlines the importance of adopting a qualitative, interpretivist approach in capturing the complex ways in which individuals think about happiness in relation to themselves and their wider social context. The opportunities and challenges of utilising the Mass Observation Archive as a resource for happiness researchers are also addressed.","PeriodicalId":311525,"journal":{"name":"Researching Happiness","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Personal Happiness, Social Unhappiness: Understanding the Complexity of Individual Happiness Accounts\",\"authors\":\"David Tross\",\"doi\":\"10.46692/9781529206159.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"While concerted, inter-disciplinary efforts have been made to measure happiness and wellbeing at national and international levels, an over-reliance on quantitative data generated through numerical self-reports has meant that a limited, thin- sliced picture of happiness has emerged. This chapter explores 200 accounts of happiness, generated through a 2013 Mass Observation directive, that provide a nuanced picture of happiness in the UK. The research found that when individuals talk about their happiness they mainly talk about their personal lives: their relationships and social and cultural engagements. Conversely, when they talk about unhappiness they often focus on social and political factors. This more socially and politically engaged aspect to lay happiness accounts highlights problems with conceptualizing and measuring a country’s happiness as the aggregate of individual self-reports; it also underlines the importance of adopting a qualitative, interpretivist approach in capturing the complex ways in which individuals think about happiness in relation to themselves and their wider social context. The opportunities and challenges of utilising the Mass Observation Archive as a resource for happiness researchers are also addressed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":311525,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Researching Happiness\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Researching Happiness\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46692/9781529206159.004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Researching Happiness","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46692/9781529206159.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然在国家和国际层面上已经做出了协调一致的跨学科努力来衡量幸福和福祉,但过度依赖通过数字自我报告产生的定量数据意味着出现了一幅有限的、薄片的幸福图景。本章探讨了200个关于幸福的描述,这些描述来自2013年的《大众观察指令》,提供了一幅细致的英国幸福图景。研究发现,当人们谈论他们的幸福时,他们主要谈论的是他们的个人生活:他们的人际关系、社会和文化参与。相反,当他们谈论不快乐时,他们往往关注社会和政治因素。这种更多的社会和政治参与方面,奠定幸福帐户突出了概念化和衡量一个国家的幸福作为个人自我报告的总和的问题;它还强调了采用定性的、解释主义的方法来捕捉个人思考与自己和更广泛的社会背景有关的幸福的复杂方式的重要性。本文还讨论了利用大众观察档案作为幸福研究人员资源的机遇和挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Personal Happiness, Social Unhappiness: Understanding the Complexity of Individual Happiness Accounts
While concerted, inter-disciplinary efforts have been made to measure happiness and wellbeing at national and international levels, an over-reliance on quantitative data generated through numerical self-reports has meant that a limited, thin- sliced picture of happiness has emerged. This chapter explores 200 accounts of happiness, generated through a 2013 Mass Observation directive, that provide a nuanced picture of happiness in the UK. The research found that when individuals talk about their happiness they mainly talk about their personal lives: their relationships and social and cultural engagements. Conversely, when they talk about unhappiness they often focus on social and political factors. This more socially and politically engaged aspect to lay happiness accounts highlights problems with conceptualizing and measuring a country’s happiness as the aggregate of individual self-reports; it also underlines the importance of adopting a qualitative, interpretivist approach in capturing the complex ways in which individuals think about happiness in relation to themselves and their wider social context. The opportunities and challenges of utilising the Mass Observation Archive as a resource for happiness researchers are also addressed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信