传染性的转变:卡门·斯蒂芬的玛尔·艾瑞亚

Justin Mohler
{"title":"传染性的转变:卡门·斯蒂芬的玛尔·艾瑞亚","authors":"Justin Mohler","doi":"10.3726/lfl.2020.01.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Carmen Stephan’s debut novel, Mal Aria (2012), is notable not least of all for its surprising narrator: the much-maligned mosquito. Given our shared history, this perspective could easily devolve into misanthropy. However, the narrator’s relationship\n with Carmen, her malaria-stricken victim, is in fact deeply ambiguous. Although gifted with the power of self-reflection, she struggles in vain to save Carmen as doctors repeatedly fail to recognize the disease ravaging her body. This article argues that the physicians’ failure, read\n through the lens of Deleuze and Guattari’s notion of becoming-animal, stems from the blind application of their expertise and subsequent refusal to engage meaningfully with the world on which that knowledge is predicated. Entranced by a hierarchical epistemology based on chimeric\n individuality and thus unable to unite theory with an openness to the world, they are rendered at best ineffectual, and at worst, complicit in Carmen’s eventual death.","PeriodicalId":280788,"journal":{"name":"Literatur für Leser","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contagious Becomings: Carmen Stephan’s Mal Aria\",\"authors\":\"Justin Mohler\",\"doi\":\"10.3726/lfl.2020.01.07\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Carmen Stephan’s debut novel, Mal Aria (2012), is notable not least of all for its surprising narrator: the much-maligned mosquito. Given our shared history, this perspective could easily devolve into misanthropy. However, the narrator’s relationship\\n with Carmen, her malaria-stricken victim, is in fact deeply ambiguous. Although gifted with the power of self-reflection, she struggles in vain to save Carmen as doctors repeatedly fail to recognize the disease ravaging her body. This article argues that the physicians’ failure, read\\n through the lens of Deleuze and Guattari’s notion of becoming-animal, stems from the blind application of their expertise and subsequent refusal to engage meaningfully with the world on which that knowledge is predicated. Entranced by a hierarchical epistemology based on chimeric\\n individuality and thus unable to unite theory with an openness to the world, they are rendered at best ineffectual, and at worst, complicit in Carmen’s eventual death.\",\"PeriodicalId\":280788,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Literatur für Leser\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Literatur für Leser\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3726/lfl.2020.01.07\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Literatur für Leser","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3726/lfl.2020.01.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

卡门·斯蒂芬的处女作《玛尔·阿里亚》(2012)尤其因其令人惊讶的叙述者——备受诟病的蚊子而引人注目。考虑到我们共同的历史,这种观点很容易演变成厌恶人类。然而,叙述者与她的疟疾受害者卡门的关系实际上是非常模糊的。虽然她有自我反省的能力,但她努力拯救卡门却徒劳,因为医生们一再未能识别出正在肆虐卡门身体的疾病。本文认为,从德勒兹和瓜塔里的“变成动物”概念的角度来看,医生的失败源于他们对专业知识的盲目应用,以及随后拒绝有意义地参与到知识赖以存在的世界中。他们被一种基于嵌合个性的等级认识论所迷惑,因此无法将理论与对世界的开放统一起来,往好了说,他们是无效的,往坏了说,他们是卡门最终死亡的同谋。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Contagious Becomings: Carmen Stephan’s Mal Aria
Abstract Carmen Stephan’s debut novel, Mal Aria (2012), is notable not least of all for its surprising narrator: the much-maligned mosquito. Given our shared history, this perspective could easily devolve into misanthropy. However, the narrator’s relationship with Carmen, her malaria-stricken victim, is in fact deeply ambiguous. Although gifted with the power of self-reflection, she struggles in vain to save Carmen as doctors repeatedly fail to recognize the disease ravaging her body. This article argues that the physicians’ failure, read through the lens of Deleuze and Guattari’s notion of becoming-animal, stems from the blind application of their expertise and subsequent refusal to engage meaningfully with the world on which that knowledge is predicated. Entranced by a hierarchical epistemology based on chimeric individuality and thus unable to unite theory with an openness to the world, they are rendered at best ineffectual, and at worst, complicit in Carmen’s eventual death.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信